Literature DB >> 21915703

[Quality of postoperative pain therapy in Austria: national survey of all departments of anesthesiology].

C Kinstner1, R Likar, A Sandner-Kiesling, D Hutschala, W Pipam, B Gustorff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite increasingly sophisticated concepts of perioperative pain therapy, such as increased use of combined regional anesthesia techniques, the renaissance of ketamine and dipyrone or the use of oral opioids, no significant improvement has been achieved in postoperative pain therapy since 1995. About 300,000 of the approximately 700,000 patients undergoing major surgery each year in Austria experience moderate to severe postoperative pain. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the nationwide status of perioperative acute pain management in postoperative recovery rooms and surgical wards in order to identify potential areas for improvement.
METHODS: In 2006 the directors of all Austrian anesthesiology departments (n=125, 100%) were contacted and asked to give detailed information on the status of acute pain management of each individual hospital in Austria using a standardized questionnaire. Data of each individual department were derived from quality control and self-assessment of each department. No patients were questioned. The return rate was 96% (n=120) due to intensive personal contact in cases of missing data.
RESULTS: In this nationwide survey 120 anesthesiology departments participated together accounting for a total of 757,895 operations per year. Of the patients 63.6% were informed preoperatively on the available regimens of acute pain management. In 81% of patients perioperative pain therapy consisted of a multimodal therapeutic approach, 58.6% of the departments used international guidelines and 39.7% worked with international guidelines adapted to local requirements. In 88% of patients a detailed prescription for postoperative pain therapy was available when transferred to the surgical ward. Surgical wards were equipped with routine pain therapy protocols in 28% another 20% of wards had special pain therapy protocols for individual operations. In 22% of cases pain assessment was repeated 3-4 times per day and in 33.9% postoperative pain was assessed only once twice per day. Pain assessments were recorded in the patient charts in 60.7% of cases. If changes to the pain therapy regimen were required anesthesiologists were involved in only 14.3% of cases. In addition an acute pain service was available only in 39.2% of Austrian anesthesiology departments.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the multimodal approach to acute pain therapy is widely used and standardized therapeutic regimens are well established in the majority of anesthesiology and surgical wards, there still remains room for improvement. Pain assessment is generally barely adequate and written documentation of pain assessment is missing almost completely. In addition, almost two thirds of hospitals in Austria are still lacking an acute pain service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21915703     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-011-1911-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  20 in total

Review 1.  1996 Labat lecture: pain--a persistent problem.

Authors:  M J Cousins; I Power; G Smith
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Postoperative analgesia in Italy. National survey on the anaesthetist's beliefs, opinions, behaviour and techniques in postoperative pain control in Italy.

Authors:  M Nolli; G Apolone; F Nicosia
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Fast-tracking pulmonary resections.

Authors:  R J Cerfolio; A Pickens; C Bass; C Katholi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Abdominal surgery, pain and anxiety: preoperative nursing intervention.

Authors:  Li-Ying Lin; Ruey-Hsia Wang
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  [Surgical pain management. A Germany-wide survey including the effect of clinical guidelines].

Authors:  E Neugebauer; S Sauerland; V Keck; C Simanski; J Witte
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Impact of preoperative education on pain outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Judy Watt-Watson; Bonnie Stevens; Joel Katz; Judy Costello; Graham J Reid; Tirone David
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Postoperative pain management: why is it difficult to show that it improves outcome?

Authors:  H Breivik
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Postoperative Analgesic THerapy Observational Survey (PATHOS): a practice pattern study in 7 central/southern European countries.

Authors:  Dan Benhamou; Marco Berti; Gerhard Brodner; Jose De Andres; Gaetano Draisci; Mariano Moreno-Azcoita; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Wolfgang Schwenk; Luis Miguel Torres; Eric Viel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  [Postoperative pain therapy in Germany].

Authors:  U Stamer; N Mpasios; F Stüber; H Laubenthal; C Maier
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Acute pain management. Programs in U.S. hospitals and experiences and attitudes among U.S. adults.

Authors:  C A Warfield; C H Kahn
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].

Authors:  R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  [Requirements for the organization of pain therapy in hospitals: interdepartmental comparison for pain management from the employees' perspective].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; G Ufer; A Hecke; M Pfingsten; M Bauer; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Pain relief during and after surgical procedures : Results of an Austria-wide patient survey on postoperative pain and perioperative pain management].

Authors:  W Jaksch; R Likar; U Frohner; F Herbst
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Organization of pediatric pain management: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations for pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  [Quality of postoperative pain therapy: evaluation of an established anesthesiology acute pain service].

Authors:  V Kainzwaldner; B Rachinger-Adam; T Mioc-Curic; T Wöhrle; L C Hinske; B Luchting; T Ewert; S C Azad
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Pre-existing pain as comorbidity in postoperative acute pain service].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; J Schlink; M Pfingsten; J Hinz; M Bauer; M Quintel; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  A Prospective Multicentre Study to Improve Postoperative Pain: Identification of Potentialities and Problems.

Authors:  Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Patrick Kutschar; Nadja Nestler; Juergen Osterbrink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.