Literature DB >> 34975879

Prostate Cancer: Early Detection and Assessing Clinical Risk Using Deep Machine Learning of High Dimensional Peripheral Blood Flow Cytometric Phenotyping Data.

Georgina Cosma1, Stéphanie E McArdle2,3, Gemma A Foulds2,3, Simon P Hood2, Stephen Reeder2,3, Catherine Johnson2,3, Masood A Khan4, A Graham Pockley2,3.   

Abstract

Detecting the presence of prostate cancer (PCa) and distinguishing low- or intermediate-risk disease from high-risk disease early, and without the need for potentially unnecessary invasive biopsies remains a significant clinical challenge. The aim of this study is to determine whether the T and B cell phenotypic features which we have previously identified as being able to distinguish between benign prostate disease and PCa in asymptomatic men having Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels < 20 ng/ml can also be used to detect the presence and clinical risk of PCa in a larger cohort of patients whose PSA levels ranged between 3 and 2617 ng/ml. The peripheral blood of 130 asymptomatic men having elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels was immune profiled using multiparametric whole blood flow cytometry. Of these men, 42 were subsequently diagnosed as having benign prostate disease and 88 as having PCa on biopsy-based evidence. We built a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Deep Neural Network (biLSTM) model for detecting the presence of PCa in men which combined the previously-identified phenotypic features (CD8+CD45RA-CD27-CD28- (CD8+ Effector Memory cells), CD4+CD45RA-CD27-CD28- (CD4+ Effector Memory cells), CD4+CD45RA+CD27-CD28- (CD4+ Terminally Differentiated Effector Memory Cells re-expressing CD45RA), CD3-CD19+ (B cells), CD3+CD56+CD8+CD4+ (NKT cells) with Age. The performance of the PCa presence 'detection' model was: Acc: 86.79 ( ± 0.10), Sensitivity: 82.78% (± 0.15); Specificity: 95.83% (± 0.11) on the test set (test set that was not used during training and validation); AUC: 89.31% (± 0.07), ORP-FPR: 7.50% (± 0.20), ORP-TPR: 84.44% (± 0.14). A second biLSTM 'risk' model combined the immunophenotypic features with PSA to predict whether a patient with PCa has high-risk disease (defined by the D'Amico Risk Classification) achieved the following: Acc: 94.90% (± 6.29), Sensitivity: 92% (± 21.39); Specificity: 96.11 (± 0.00); AUC: 94.06% (± 10.69), ORP-FPR: 3.89% (± 0.00), ORP-TPR: 92% (± 21.39). The ORP-FPR for predicting the presence of PCa when combining FC+PSA was lower than that of PSA alone. This study demonstrates that AI approaches based on peripheral blood phenotyping profiles can distinguish between benign prostate disease and PCa and predict clinical risk in asymptomatic men having elevated PSA levels.
Copyright © 2021 Cosma, McArdle, Foulds, Hood, Reeder, Johnson, Khan and Pockley.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA level; computational analysis; flow cytometry; immunophenotyping data; machine learning; predictive modeling; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34975879      PMCID: PMC8716718          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


  15 in total

1.  Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Shady Nafie; Raj P Pal; John P Dormer; Masood A Khan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Standards for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Eleanor I Walsh; J Athene Lane; Sian Noble; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Jonathan A C Sterne; Peter Holding; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Elizabeth M Hill; Siaw Yein Ng; Jessica Toole; Marta K Tazewell; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Joanna C Thorn; Elizabeth Down; George Davey Smith; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program.

Authors:  René Raaijmakers; Wim J Kirkels; Monique J Roobol; Mark F Wildhagen; Fritz H Schrder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?

Authors:  B Djavan; V Ravery; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; M Dobrovits; M Fakhari; C Seitz; M Susani; A Borkowski; L Boccon-Gibod; C C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve men with PSA less than 20 ng ml(-1.).

Authors:  S Nafie; J K Mellon; J P Dormer; M A Khan
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Risk profiles of prostate cancers identified from UK primary care using national referral guidelines.

Authors:  H Serag; S Banerjee; K Saeb-Parsy; S Irving; K Wright; S Stearn; A Doble; V J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Identifying the Presence of Prostate Cancer in Individuals with PSA Levels <20 ng ml-1 Using Computational Data Extraction Analysis of High Dimensional Peripheral Blood Flow Cytometric Phenotyping Data.

Authors:  Georgina Cosma; Stéphanie E McArdle; Stephen Reeder; Gemma A Foulds; Simon Hood; Masood Khan; A Graham Pockley
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.