Literature DB >> 1604317

Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence.

W R Rice1.   

Abstract

When selection differs between the sexes, a mutation beneficial to one sex may be harmful to the other (sexually antagonistic). Because the sexes share a common gene pool, selection in one sex can interfere with the other's adaptive evolution. Theory predicts that sexually antagonistic mutations should accumulate in tight linkage with a new sex-determining gene, even when the harm to benefit ratio is high. Genetic markers and artificial selection were used to make a pair of autosomal genes segregate like a new pair of sex-determining genes in a Drosophila melanogaster model system. A 29-generation study provides experimental evidence that sexually antagonistic genes may be common in nature and will accumulate in response to a new sex-determining gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1604317     DOI: 10.1126/science.1604317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  89 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects.

Authors:  G Arnqvist; M Edvardsson; U Friberg; T Nilsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young.

Authors:  D J Hosken; T W J Garner; T Tregenza; N Wedell; P I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The sexual selection continuum.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  Richard H Baker; Apurva Narechania; Philip M Johns; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in both sexes of a moth.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 9.  Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Troy Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Douglas Ewbank; Sean G Byars
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.