| Literature DB >> 24335614 |
Xiao-Jing Zhang, Jian-Feng Qiu, Lan-Ping Guo, Ying Wang, Peng Li, Feng-Qing Yang, Huanxing Su1, Jian-Bo Wan2.
Abstract
Multi-origin Chinese herbal medicines, with herbs originating from more than one species of plants, is a common phenomenon but an important issue in Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs). In the present study, a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based fatty acid profiling approach to rapidly discriminate multi-origin Chinese medicines in terms of species and medicinal parts was proposed and validated using tuberous roots (Curcumae Radix) and rhizomes (Curcumae Rhizoma and Curcumae Longae Rhizoma) derived from four Curcuma species (e.g., C. wenyujin, C. kwangsiensis, C. phaeocaulis and C. longa) as models. Both type and content of fatty acids varied among different species of either tuberous roots or rhizomes, indicating each species has its own fatty acid pattern. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) based on dataset of global fatty acid profiling showed that either tuberous roots or rhizomes samples could be clearly classified into four clusters according to their species. Furthermore, those tested samples could also be discriminated in terms of their medicinal parts (e.g., tuberous root and rhizome). Our findings suggest that the proposed GC-MS-based fatty acid profiling followed by multivariate statistical analysis provides a reliable platform to discriminate multi-origin Chinese herbal medicines according to species and medicinal parts, which will be helpful for ensuring their quality, safety and efficacy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24335614 PMCID: PMC6269696 DOI: 10.3390/molecules181215329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Stability, repeatability and precision data of the investigated fatty acids.
| FA | Precision | Stability | Repeatability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (%) | RSD (%) | Content (%) | RSD (%) | Content (%) | RSD (%) | |
| C15:0 | 9.16 ± 0.22 | 2.39 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 2.95 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 4.49 |
| C16:0 | 9.69 ± 0.15 | 1.52 | 25.01 ± 0.21 | 0.84 | 25.53 ± 0.32 | 1.27 |
| C17:0 | 9.85 ± 0.07 | 0.68 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 1.95 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 5.15 |
| C18:0 | 9.97 ± 0.05 | 0.46 | 4.23 ± 0.06 | 1.52 | 4.45 ± 0.39 | 8.77 |
| C18:1 n-9 | 10.14 ± 0.02 | 0.23 | 7.59 ± 0.08 | 1.07 | 7.71 ± 0.12 | 1.58 |
| C18:2 n-6 | 9.74 ± 0.04 | 0.43 | 39.39 ± 0.31 | 0.77 | 38.71 ± 0.46 | 1.18 |
| C18:3 n-3 | 9.46 ± 0.02 | 0.26 | 17.3 ± 0.59 | 3.4 | 17.03 ± 0.35 | 2.08 |
| C20:0 | 8.71 ± 0.08 | 0.86 | 1.54 ± 0.05 | 3.11 | 1.58 ± 0.08 | 4.92 |
| C20:1 | 10.87 ± 0.10 | 0.96 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 2.77 | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 8.90 |
| C22:0 | 6.74 ± 0.22 | 3.24 | 1.17 ± 0.07 | 6.01 | 1.21 ± 0.04 | 3.7 |
| C24:0 | 5.66 ± 0.10 | 1.69 | 2.02 ± 0.11 | 5.38 | 2.09 ± 0.10 | 4.96 |
Figure 1Representative extracted ion chromatograms of m/z 74 of mixed standards and methyl ester of fatty acids in tuberous roots (A) and rhizomes (B) derived from C. wenyujin, C. phaeocaulis, C. kwangsiensis and C. longa. The mixed standards contain 32 fatty acid methyl esters as described in the Chemicals section. Fatty acids were represented as the corresponding methyl esters. 1. C14:0; 2. C15:0; 3. C16:0; 4. C16:1 n-7; 5. C17:0; 6. C17:1 n-7; 7. C18:0; 8. C18:1 n-9; 9. C18:2 n-6; 10. C18:3 n-3; 11. C20:0; 12. C20:1 n-9; 13. C22:0; 14. C24:0.
Fatty acid profiles of the tuberous roots and rhizomes from four Curcuma species.
| Peak No. | Fatty Acid (%) | Tuberous Root | Rhizome | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common Name | Symbol | CW (
| CP (
| CK (
| CL (
| CW (
| CP(
| CK (
| CL (
| |
| 1 | Tetradecanoic acid | C14:0 | 0.66 ± 0.31 a | 0.83 ± 0.19 a | 0.32 ± 0.12 b | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 2 | Pentadecanoic acid | C15:0 | 0.32 ± 0.06 a | 0.28 ± 0.02 b | 0.46 ± 0.05 c | 0.76 ± 0.09 d | 0.56 ± 0.05 a | 0.26 ± 0.02 b | 0.68 ± 0.12 c | 0.77 ± 0.08 d |
| 3 | Palmitic acid | C16:0 | 28.32 ± 1.10 a | 29.40 ± 0.96 b | 27.09 ± 1.5 c | 24.55 ± 0.54 d | 25.45 ± 1.10 a | 25.82 ± 0.38 a | 25.55 ± 1.89 a | 22.88 ± 0.64 b |
| 4 | Palmitoleic acid | C16:1 n-7 | 2.85 ± 2.25 a | 3.62 ± 0.18 a | 0.58 ± 0.24 b | 0.53 ± 0.18 b | ND | 2.01 ± 0.35 | ND | ND |
| 5 | Heptadecanoic acid | C17:0 | 0.33 ± 0.04 a | 0.47 ± 0.04 b | 0.52 ± 0.07 b | 0.69 ± 0.11 c | 0.62 ± 0.07 a | 0.63 ± 0.05 a | 0.85 ± 0.16 b | 0.77 ± 0.05 b |
| 6 | Heptadecenoic acid | C17:1 n-7 | 0.62 ± 0.41 a | 1.55 ± 0.28 b | ND | ND | ND | 0.85 ± 0.36 | ND | ND |
| 7 | Stearic acid | C18:0 | 4.43 ± 0.88 a | 3.11 ± 0.76 b | 4.28 ± 0.59 a | 3.08 ± 0.43 b | 4.78 ± 0.58 a | 3.79 ± 0.17 b | 5.64 ± 0.53 c | 3.39 ± 0.17 d |
| 8 | Oleic acid | C18:1 n-9 | 5.49 ± 0.84 a | 3.02 ± 0.49 b | 10.78 ± 2.4 c | 4.57 ± 0.56 d | 8.92 ± 0.89 a | 4.08 ± 0.47 b | 10.83 ± 1.51 c | 6.28 ± 1.28 d |
| 9 | Linoleic acid | C18:2 n-6 | 37.29 ± 2.35 a | 35.66 ± 1.19 a | 40.10 ± 0.79 b | 42.78 ± 1.15 c | 39.73 ± 0.92 a | 38.26 ± 1.18 b | 38.61 ± 2.36 a,b | 42.61 ± 1.09 c |
| 10 | α-linolenic acid | C18:3 n-3 | 15.52 ± 0.93 a | 17.65 ± 1.0 b | 10.56 ± 2.62 c | 16.25 ± 0.71 d | 14.57 ± 1.47 a | 17.59 ± 0.65 b | 13.37 ± 2.42 a | 15.69 ± 1.20 c |
| 11 | Arachidic acid | C20:0 | 0.90 ± 0.17 a | 0.99 ± 0.21 a | 1.34 ± 0.58 a | 1.68 ± 0.23 b | 1.33 ± 0.21 a | 1.64 ± 0.21 b | 0.91 ± 0.32 c | 2.20 ± 0.37 d |
| 12 | Eicosenoic acid | C20:1 n-9 | 0.26 ± 0.06 a | 0.37 ± 0.13 a,b | 0.47 ± 0.12 b | 0.46 ± 0.06 c | 0.54 ± 0.08 a | 1.85 ± 0.08 b | 1.02 ± 0.58 c | 0.56 ± 0.10 a |
| 13 | Docosanoic acid | C22:0 | 0.81 ± 0.20 a | 0.86 ± 0.09 a,b | 1.06 ± 0.33 b | 1.63 ± 0.22 c | 1.18 ± 0.18 a | 1.34 ± 0.26 b | 0.81 ± 0.27 c | 2.14 ± 0.41 d |
| 14 | Lignoceric acid | C24:0 | 2.27 ± 0.40 a | 2.19 ± 0.21 a | 2.44 ± 0.73 a | 3.03 ± 0.36 b | 2.33 ± 0.39 a | 1.88 ± 0.67 b | 1.73 ± 0.51 b | 2.73 ± 0.46 c |
| SFA | 37.95 ± 1.36 a | 38.12 ± 1.26 a | 37.50 ± 0.81 a | 35.41 ± 0.81 b | 36.24 ± 1.34 a | 35.37 ± 0.74 | 36.18 ± 2.29 | 34.89 ± 1.12 b | ||
| MUFA | 9.21 ± 2.22 a | 8.58 ± 1.10 a | 11.83 ± 2.55 b | 5.56 ± 0.57 c | 9.45 ± 0.91 a | 8.79 ± 0.94 a | 11.85 ± 1.94 c | 6.81 ± 1.27 b | ||
| PUFA | 52.79 ± 2.73 a | 53.30 ± 1.61 a | 50.66 ± 2.57 b | 59.03 ± 0.96 c | 54.31 ± 1.45 a | 55.85 ± 1.23 b | 51.980 ± 1.27 c | 58.30 ± 1.15 d | ||
| n-6/n-3 | 2.41 ± 0.18 a | 2.0 3 ± 0.14 b | 4.05 ± 1.14 c | 2.64 ± 0.16 d | 2.75 ± 0.29 a | 2.18 ± 0.11 b | 2.99 ± 0.64 a | 2.73 ± 0.25 a | ||
Average followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). ND, not detected; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; CW, C. wenyujin; CP, C. phaeocaulis; CK, C. kwangsiensis; CL, C. longa.
Figure 2OPLS-DA score plots based on fatty acids profiles of (A) tuberous roots and (B) rhizomes derived from C. wenyujin, C. phaeocaulis, C. kwangsiensis and C. longa.
Figure 3HCA dendrograms resulting from the contents of fatty acids in (A) tuberous roots and (B) rhizomes derived from C. wenyujin, C. phaeocaulis, C. kwangsiensis and C. longa.
Figure 4OPLS-DA score plots based on fatty acids profiles of 74 batches of Curcuma samples, including tuberous roots and rhizomes. (A) Samples were defined as tuberous roots and rhizomes, (B) Samples were defined as “Yujin”, “Ezhu” and “Jianghuang”. The rhizomes of three Curcuma species, including C. wenyujin, C. kwangsiensis and C. phaeocaulis are used as “Ezhu”. The rhizome of C. longa is commonly used as “Jianghuang”, and the tuberous roots of aforementioned four Curcuma species were defined as “Yujin”.