OBJECTIVES: Artemisinin and artemisinin semi-synthetic derivatives (collectively known as endoperoxides) are first-line antimalarials for the treatment of uncomplicated and severe malaria. Endoperoxides display very fast killing rates and are generally recalcitrant to parasite resistance development. These key pharmacodynamic features are a result of a complex mechanism of action, the details of which lack consensus. Here, we report on the primary physiological events leading to parasite death. METHODS: Parasite mitochondrial (ΔΨm) and plasma membrane (ΔΨp) electrochemical potentials were measured using real-time single-cell imaging following exposure to pharmacologically relevant concentrations of endoperoxides (artemisinin, dihydroartemisinin, artesunate and the synthetic tetraoxane RKA182). In addition, mitochondrial electron transport chain components NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (alternative complex I), bc1 (complex III) and cytochrome oxidase (complex IV) were investigated to determine their functional sensitivity to the various endoperoxides. RESULTS: Parasite exposure to endoperoxides resulted in rapid depolarization of parasite ΔΨm and ΔΨp. The rate of depolarization was decreased in the presence of a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger and Fe(3+) chelators. Depolarization of ΔΨm by endoperoxides is not believed to be through the inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport chain components, owing to the lack of significant inhibition when assayed directly. CONCLUSIONS: The depolarization of ΔΨm and ΔΨp is shown to be mediated via the generation of ROS that are initiated by iron bioactivation of endoperoxides and/or catalysed by iron-dependent oxidative stress. These data are discussed in the context of current hypotheses concerning the mode of action of endoperoxides.
OBJECTIVES: Artemisinin and artemisinin semi-synthetic derivatives (collectively known as endoperoxides) are first-line antimalarials for the treatment of uncomplicated and severe malaria. Endoperoxides display very fast killing rates and are generally recalcitrant to parasite resistance development. These key pharmacodynamic features are a result of a complex mechanism of action, the details of which lack consensus. Here, we report on the primary physiological events leading to parasite death. METHODS: Parasite mitochondrial (ΔΨm) and plasma membrane (ΔΨp) electrochemical potentials were measured using real-time single-cell imaging following exposure to pharmacologically relevant concentrations of endoperoxides (artemisinin, dihydroartemisinin, artesunate and the synthetic tetraoxane RKA182). In addition, mitochondrial electron transport chain components NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (alternative complex I), bc1 (complex III) and cytochrome oxidase (complex IV) were investigated to determine their functional sensitivity to the various endoperoxides. RESULTS: Parasite exposure to endoperoxides resulted in rapid depolarization of parasite ΔΨm and ΔΨp. The rate of depolarization was decreased in the presence of a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger and Fe(3+) chelators. Depolarization of ΔΨm by endoperoxides is not believed to be through the inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport chain components, owing to the lack of significant inhibition when assayed directly. CONCLUSIONS: The depolarization of ΔΨm and ΔΨp is shown to be mediated via the generation of ROS that are initiated by iron bioactivation of endoperoxides and/or catalysed by iron-dependent oxidative stress. These data are discussed in the context of current hypotheses concerning the mode of action of endoperoxides.
Authors: Richard K Haynes; Wing-Yan Ho; Ho-Wai Chan; Burkhard Fugmann; Jörg Stetter; Simon L Croft; Livia Vivas; Wallace Peters; Brian L Robinson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2004-03-05 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jacob Golenser; Judith H Waknine; Miriam Krugliak; Nicholas H Hunt; Georges E Grau Journal: Int J Parasitol Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: I Morel; J Cillard; G Lescoat; O Sergent; N Pasdeloup; A Z Ocaktan; M A Abdallah; P Brissot; P Cillard Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Donelly A van Schalkwyk; Kevin J Saliba; Giancarlo A Biagini; Patrick G Bray; Kiaran Kirk Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hanafy M Ismail; Victoria Barton; Matthew Phanchana; Sitthivut Charoensutthivarakul; Michael H L Wong; Janet Hemingway; Giancarlo A Biagini; Paul M O'Neill; Stephen A Ward Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Judith Straimer; Nina F Gnädig; Benoit Witkowski; Chanaki Amaratunga; Valentine Duru; Arba Pramundita Ramadani; Mélanie Dacheux; Nimol Khim; Lei Zhang; Stephen Lam; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Odile Mercereau-Puijalon; Françoise Benoit-Vical; Rick M Fairhurst; Didier Ménard; David A Fidock Journal: Science Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dina Coertzen; Janette Reader; Mariëtte van der Watt; Sindisiwe H Nondaba; Liezl Gibhard; Lubbe Wiesner; Peter Smith; Sarah D'Alessandro; Donatella Taramelli; Ho Ning Wong; Jan L du Preez; Ronald Wai Keung Wu; Lyn-Marie Birkholtz; Richard K Haynes Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sean V Connelly; Javier Manzella-Lapeira; Zoë C Levine; Joseph Brzostowski; Ludmila Krymskaya; Rifat S Rahman; Angela C Ellis; Shuchi N Amin; Juliana M Sá; Thomas E Wellems Journal: mBio Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 7.867