Literature DB >> 24334431

Routine use of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel for identification of clinically actionable somatic mutations.

Gregory J Tsongalis, Jason D Peterson, Francine B de Abreu, Christopher D Tunkey, Torrey L Gallagher, Linda D Strausbaugh, Wendy A Wells, Christopher I Amos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Somatic mutation analysis is standard of practice for solid tumors in order to identify therapeutic sensitizing and resistance mutations. Our laboratory routinely performed standalone PCR-based methods for mutations in several genes. Rapid discovery and introduction of new therapeutics has demanded additional genomic information for adequate management of the cancer patient. We evaluated a next generation sequencing assay, the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panelv2 (CHPv2), capable of identifying multiple somatic mutations in 50 genes in a single assay.
METHODS: Accuracy, precision, limit of detection, and specificity were evaluated using DNA from well-characterized cell lines, genetically engineered cell lines fixed and embedded in paraffin, and previously tested mutation positive or negative, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Normal kidney, tonsil and colon FFPE tissues were used as controls.
RESULTS: Accuracy studies showed 100% concordance in each patient sample between previous PCR results and the corresponding variants identified using the Ion Torrent panel. Precision studies gave consistent results when libraries were prepared from the same original DNA and were run on multiple 316 chips. The limit of detection was determined to be 5% for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 20% for insertions and deletions (indels). Specificity studies using normal FFPE tissue previously tested by PCR methods were also 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: We have evaluated the performance of the AmpliSeq Cancer Panel Hotspotv2 and show that it is suitable for clinical testing. This next generation sequencing panel has allowed the laboratory to consolidate a broader range of molecular oncology testing to a single platform and single assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24334431     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  59 in total

1.  Clinical applicability and cost of a 46-gene panel for genomic analysis of solid tumours: Retrospective validation and prospective audit in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Angela Hamblin; Sarah Wordsworth; Jilles M Fermont; Suzanne Page; Kulvinder Kaur; Carme Camps; Pamela Kaisaki; Avinash Gupta; Denis Talbot; Mark Middleton; Shirley Henderson; Anthony Cutts; Dimitrios V Vavoulis; Nick Housby; Ian Tomlinson; Jenny C Taylor; Anna Schuh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Next generation sequencing identifies novel potential actionable mutations for grade I meningioma treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Pepe; Pasquale Pisapia; Maria Laura Del Basso de Caro; Floriana Conticelli; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone; Juan Carlos Martinez
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Reference standards for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Simon A Hardwick; Ira W Deveson; Tim R Mercer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Development and validation of the JAX Cancer Treatment Profile™ for detection of clinically actionable mutations in solid tumors.

Authors:  Guruprasad Ananda; Susan Mockus; Micaela Lundquist; Vanessa Spotlow; Al Simons; Talia Mitchell; Grace Stafford; Vivek Philip; Timothy Stearns; Anuj Srivastava; Mary Barter; Lucy Rowe; Joan Malcolm; Carol Bult; Radha Krishna Murthy Karuturi; Karen Rasmussen; Douglas Hinerfeld
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 3.362

5.  Molecular profiling of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Juan Putra; Francine B de Abreu; Jason D Peterson; J Marc Pipas; Kabir Mody; Christopher I Amos; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.362

6.  A labor- and cost-effective non-optical semiconductor (Ion Torrent) next-generation sequencing of the SLC12A3 and CLCNKA/B genes in Gitelman's syndrome patients.

Authors:  Beatriz Tavira; Juan Gómez; Fernando Santos; Helena Gil; Victoria Alvarez; Eliecer Coto
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Clinical application of a custom AmpliSeq library and ion torrent PGM sequencing to comprehensive mutation screening for deafness genes.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Nishio; Yoshiharu Hayashi; Manabu Watanabe; Shin-Ichi Usami
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 8.  Progress and opportunities in molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal premalignant lesions.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Kana Wu; Reiko Nishihara; Michael O'Brien; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Clinical Outcomes of TP53 Mutations in Cancers.

Authors:  Ana I Robles; Jin Jen; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  The potential utility of re-mining results of somatic mutation testing: KRAS status in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Biernacka; Peter D Tsongalis; Jason D Peterson; Francine B de Abreu; Candice C Black; Edward J Gutmann; Xiaoying Liu; Laura J Tafe; Christopher I Amos; Gregory J Tsongalis
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.