Literature DB >> 24333361

Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Jeff F Lin1, Jessica L Berger2, Thomas C Krivak3, Sushil Beriwal2, John K Chan4, Paniti Sukumvanich2, Bradley J Monk5, Scott D Richard6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chemosensitizing radiation with brachytherapy is standard of care for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, an increasingly rare disease. Treatment facility volume has been correlated with outcome in many diseases. Treatment outcome and likelihood of receiving standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer based on facility volume were examined using a large national cancer database.
METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with stage IIB - IIIB cervical cancer from 1/1998 through 12/2010. Facility volumes were tallied. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine variables affecting survival, receiving standard therapy, and total duration of radiotherapy.
RESULTS: We identified a total of 27,660 patients who were treated at 1361 facilities. Thirty of the facilities (2.2%) treated the highest quartile volume of patients (>9.4 patients annually) while 1072 facilities (78.8%) treated <2.4 patients annually. The median age of patients was 53, the majority were Caucasian, treated in a metropolitan area, and of squamous cell histology. Median survival of patients treated at lowest- and highest-volume centers were 42.3 months (95% CI 39.8-44.8) and 53.8 months (50.1-57.5), respectively (p < 0.001). The proportions of patients receiving brachytherapy and chemotherapy were 54.8% and 79.9%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher facility volume independently predicted improved survival (p = 0.022), increased likelihood of receiving brachytherapy (p < 0.0005) and chemotherapy (p = 0.013), and shorter time to radiotherapy completion (p < 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated at high volume centers are more likely to receive standard therapy, complete therapy sooner, and experience better survival.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Healthcare outcomes; National cancer database; Quality of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24333361     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of anal cancer outcomes in public and private hospital patients treated at a single radiation oncology center.

Authors:  Danielle S Bitterman; David Grew; Ping Gu; Richard F Cohen; Nicholas J Sanfilippo; Cynthia G Leichman; Lawrence P Leichman; Harvey G Moore; Heather T Gold; Kevin L Du
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10

2.  Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Ana I Tergas; Cassandra Duffy; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Clinical benefit of treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer at high volume facilities.

Authors:  Waqar Haque; Monty Aghazadeh; Brian J Miles; Raj Satkunasivam; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

4.  [Substantial advantage of CT-planned HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients compared to a historical series with regard to local control and toxicity?]

Authors:  Simone Marnitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Characteristics and survival outcomes associated with the lack of radiation in the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Therese A Dolecek; Quan Chen; Catherine R Garcia; Thomas Pittman; John L Villano
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Radiation Duration in Women with Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Chemoradiation: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Ana I Tergas; Alfred I Neugut; Ling Chen; William M Burke; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Vaginal Cancer and Its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/042, October 2018).

Authors:  Hans-Georg Schnürch; Sven Ackermann; Celine D Alt-Radtke; Lukas Angleitner; Jana Barinoff; Matthias W Beckmann; Carsten Böing; Christian Dannecker; Tanja Fehm; Rüdiger Gaase; Paul Gass; Marion Gebhardt; Friederike Gieseking; Andreas Günthert; Carolin C Hack; Peer Hantschmann; Lars Christian Horn; Martin C Koch; Anne Letsch; Peter Mallmann; Bernhard Mangold; Simone Marnitz; Grit Mehlhorn; Kerstin Paradies; Michael J Reinhardt; Reina Tholen; Uwe Torsten; Wolfgang Weikel; Linn Wölber; Monika Hampl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Definitive chemoradiation at high volume facilities is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Waqar Haque; Vivek Verma; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Enhancing cancer registry data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) project: overview and methodology.

Authors:  Vivien W Chen; Christie R Eheman; Christopher J Johnson; Monique N Hernandez; David Rousseau; Timothy S Styles; Dee W West; Meichin Hsieh; Anne M Hakenewerth; Maria O Celaya; Randi K Rycroft; Jennifer M Wike; Melissa Pearson; Judy Brockhouse; Linda G Mulvihill; Kevin B Zhang
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2014

10.  Association Between Treatment at High-Volume Facilities and Improved Overall Survival in Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  Sriram Venigalla; Kevin T Nead; Ronnie Sebro; David M Guttmann; Sonam Sharma; Charles B Simone; William P Levin; Robert J Wilson; Kristy L Weber; Jacob E Shabason
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.