Literature DB >> 24333249

Maximizing exosome colloidal stability following electroporation.

Joshua L Hood1, Michael J Scott2, Samuel A Wickline3.   

Abstract

Development of exosome-based semisynthetic nanovesicles for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes requires novel approaches to load exosomes with cargo. Electroporation has previously been used to load exosomes with RNA. However, investigations into exosome colloidal stability following electroporation have not been considered. Herein, we report the development of a unique trehalose pulse media (TPM) that minimizes exosome aggregation following electroporation. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and RNA absorbance were employed to determine the extent of exosome aggregation and electroextraction post electroporation in TPM compared to common PBS pulse media or sucrose pulse media (SPM). Use of TPM to disaggregate melanoma exosomes post electroporation was dependent on both exosome concentration and electric field strength. TPM maximized exosome dispersal post electroporation for both homogenous B16 melanoma and heterogeneous human serum-derived populations of exosomes. Moreover, TPM enabled heavy cargo loading of melanoma exosomes with 5nm superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION5) while maintaining original exosome size and minimizing exosome aggregation as evidenced by transmission electron microscopy. Loading exosomes with SPION5 increased exosome density on sucrose gradients. This provides a simple, label-free means of enriching exogenously modified exosomes and introduces the potential for MRI-driven theranostic exosome investigations in vivo.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroporation; Exosomes; Iron oxide; Superparamagnetic; Trehalose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24333249      PMCID: PMC3954633          DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  33 in total

1.  Secretion of a peripheral membrane protein, MFG-E8, as a complex with membrane vesicles.

Authors:  Kenji Oshima; Naohito Aoki; Takeo Kato; Ken Kitajima; Tsukasa Matsuda
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2002-02

2.  Electrofusion of cell-size liposomes.

Authors:  N G Stoicheva; S W Hui
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1994-10-12

3.  Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming.

Authors:  J Wolfers; A Lozier; G Raposo; A Regnault; C Théry; C Masurier; C Flament; S Pouzieux; F Faure; T Tursz; E Angevin; S Amigorena; L Zitvogel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Model of cell electrofusion. Membrane electroporation, pore coalescence and percolation.

Authors:  I P Sugar; W Förster; E Neumann
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1987-05-09       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Trehalose improves survival of electrotransfected mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Mussauer; V L Sukhorukov; U Zimmermann
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  2001-11-01

Review 6.  Electroporation: a general phenomenon for manipulating cells and tissues.

Authors:  J C Weaver
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.429

7.  Exosomes bearing HLA-G are released by melanoma cells.

Authors:  Béatrice Riteau; Florence Faure; Catherine Menier; Sophie Viel; Edgardo D Carosella; Sèbastian Amigorena; Nathalie Rouas-Freiss
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 8.  Multifunctional superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: promising tools in cancer theranostics.

Authors:  Poornima Budime Santhosh; Nataša Poklar Ulrih
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Plasmid and chromosomal DNA recovery by electroextraction of cyanobacteria.

Authors:  D Moser; D Zarka; C Hedman; T Kallas
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 10.  Trehalose: a review of properties, history of use and human tolerance, and results of multiple safety studies.

Authors:  A B Richards; S Krakowka; L B Dexter; H Schmid; A P M Wolterbeek; D H Waalkens-Berendsen; A Shigoyuki; M Kurimoto
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.023

View more
  85 in total

1.  Evaluation of electroporation-induced adverse effects on adipose-derived stem cell exosomes.

Authors:  Kasper Bendix Johnsen; Johann Mar Gudbergsson; Martin Najbjerg Skov; Gunna Christiansen; Leonid Gurevich; Torben Moos; Meg Duroux
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Stabilization of exosome-targeting peptides via engineered glycosylation.

Authors:  Michelle E Hung; Joshua N Leonard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Extracellular vesicles for nucleic acid delivery: progress and prospects for safe RNA-based gene therapy.

Authors:  L Jiang; P Vader; R M Schiffelers
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Achieving the Promise of Therapeutic Extracellular Vesicles: The Devil is in Details of Therapeutic Loading.

Authors:  Dhruvitkumar S Sutaria; Mohamed Badawi; Mitch A Phelps; Thomas D Schmittgen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Re-Engineering Extracellular Vesicles as Smart Nanoscale Therapeutics.

Authors:  James P K Armstrong; Margaret N Holme; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 6.  Post isolation modification of exosomes for nanomedicine applications.

Authors:  Joshua L Hood
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 7.  Exosomes as Therapeutic Vehicles for Cancer.

Authors:  Whasun Lim; Han-Soo Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.169

8.  Biomimetic nanovesicle design for cardiac tissue repair.

Authors:  Sruti Bheri; Jessica R Hoffman; Hyun-Ji Park; Michael E Davis
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 9.  A review of exosome separation techniques and characterization of B16-F10 mouse melanoma exosomes with AF4-UV-MALS-DLS-TEM.

Authors:  Kevin E Petersen; Eliana Manangon; Joshua L Hood; Samuel A Wickline; Diego P Fernandez; William P Johnson; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Melanoma exosomes promote mixed M1 and M2 macrophage polarization.

Authors:  Gina T Bardi; Mary Ann Smith; Joshua L Hood
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.