Literature DB >> 24332894

Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem-neck interface of bi-modular hip implants.

S Y Jauch1, G Huber2, H Haschke2, K Sellenschloh2, M M Morlock2.   

Abstract

Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem-neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti-Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti-CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti-Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti-Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p=0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p=0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p=0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.
Copyright © 2013 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bi-modular prosthesis; Fretting; Micromotion; Neck fracture; Stem–neck interface

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332894     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

Review 1.  What is the trouble with trunnions?

Authors:  Christina I Esposito; Timothy M Wright; Stuart B Goodman; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The effect of manufacturing tolerances on the mechanical environment of taper junctions in modular TKR.

Authors:  Kyle Snethen; Jorge Hernandez; Melinda Harman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-04-18

3.  Long-term survivorship of an exchangeable-neck hip prosthesis with a Ti-alloy/Ti-alloy neck-stem junction.

Authors:  Massimiliano Baleani; Aldo Toni; Cristina Ancarani; Susanna Stea; Barbara Bordini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA.

Authors:  Aidin Eslam Pour; Robert Borden; Takayuki Murayama; Mary Groll-Brown; J David Blaha
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comment on: Modular titanium alloy neck failure in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Loris Perticarini
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-03-17

6.  Bilateral neck fracture in bimodular femoral stem after primary total hip arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Nenad Gubeljak; Jožef Predan; Jure Sevšek; Jan Zajc; Zmago Krajnc
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Dual-taper modular hip implant: Investigation of 3-dimensional surface scans for component contact, shape, and fit.

Authors:  Nicholas B Frisch; Jonathan R Lynch; Robin Pourzal; Richard F Banglmaier; Craig D Silverton
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-07-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.