| Literature DB >> 24330497 |
Piyumi N Ekanayake, Maia Rabinovich, Kathryn M Guthridge, German C Spangenberg, John W Forster1, Timothy I Sawbridge.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tall fescue and meadow fescue are important as temperate pasture grasses, forming mutualistic associations with asexual Neotyphodium endophytes. The most frequently identified endophyte of Continental allohexaploid tall fescue is Neotyphodium coenophialum, while representatives of two other taxa (FaTG-2 and FaTG-3) have been described as colonising decaploid and Mediterranean hexaploid tall fescue, respectively. In addition, a recent study identified two other putatively novel endophyte taxa from Mediterranean hexaploid and decaploid tall fescue accessions, which were designated as uncharacterised Neotyphodium species (UNS) and FaTG-3-like respectively. In contrast, diploid meadow fescue mainly forms associations with the endophyte taxon Neotyphodium uncinatum, although a second endophyte taxon, termed N. siegelii, has also been described.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24330497 PMCID: PMC4028799 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Endophyte isolates used for phylogenetic analysis
| E34 | | RBG | ||
| NEA14 | France | NZA | ||
| NEA16 | France | NZA | ||
| NEA20 | France | NZA | ||
| NEA22 | Spain | NZA | ||
| NEA21 | Morocco | NZA | ||
| NEA23 | Tunisia | NZA | ||
| NEA17 | Spain | NZA | ||
| NEA32 | Morocco | NZA | ||
| NEA19 | UNS | Algeria | NZA | |
| NEA18 | UNS | Sardinia | NZA | |
| E81 | | RBG | ||
| NEA33 | Morocco | NZA | ||
| 9707 | Switzerland | ETH Zürich | ||
| 9340 | Switzerland | ETH Zürich | ||
| 9636 | Switzerland | ETH Zürich | ||
| SE | New Zealand | DEPI |
*ETH Zürich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland); NZA: New Zealand Agriseeds Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand; RBG: Royal Barenbrug Group, Nijmegen-Noord, Netherlands; DEPI: Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria, Australia.
$FaTG-2: Festuca arundinacea taxonomic group 2.
#FaTG-3: Festuca arundinacea taxonomic group 3.
Number of gene copies identified from each endophyte taxon represented in the analysis
| | UNS | ||||||
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Figure 1Schematic diagram of gene copy 1 of TG-2, TG-3 and UNS aligned with the gene sequence of
Figure 2Bootstrap consensus tree generated through parsimony analysis of gene sequence among reference endophyte isolates and selected fescue-derived endophytes. Branches with bootstrap values of greater than 70% from 1000 bootstrap replication are marked next to each branch. Endophyte taxa are colour coded as indicated in the legend. Endophyte taxon abbreviations prior to isolate name are as follows: Nc = N. coenophialum, Nu = N. uncinatum, UNS = uncharacterised Neotyphodium species. The perA gene sequence of E. amarillans was derived from whole genome shotgun sequence available in GenBank under accession number: AFRF00000000. The GenBank accession numbers of the perA genes derived from fescue-derived endophytes are provided in Additional file 6.
Figure 3Bootstrap consensus tree generated through parsimony analysis of gene sequence among reference endophyte isolates and selected fescue-derived endophytes. Diagram properties are as described for Figure 2. P indicates partial gene sequences obtained from the Genbank. Accessions numbers are provided adjacent to species name. The GenBank accession numbers of the tefA genes derived from fescue-derived endophytes are provided in Additional file 6.
Figure 4Bootstrap consensus tree generated through parsimony analysis of gene sequence among reference endophyte isolates and selected fescue-derived endophytes. Diagram properties are as described for Figure 2. The GenBank accession numbers of the tub2 genes derived from fescue-derived endophytes are provided in Additional file 6.
Figure 5NeighborNet network of relationships between copies of the concatenated , and gene sequences from reference endophyte isolates and selected fescue endophytes.
Summary of gene translation studies for gene
| 2 (3) | E. f (F), E. t (F), FGC1 (NF) | |
| 1 (2) | E. f (F), FGC1 (NF) | |
| 1 (2) | E. t (F), FGC1 (NF) | |
| 1 (2) | E. t (F), FGC1 (NF) | |
| UNS | 0 (2) | E. f (NF), FGC1 (NF) |
| 1 (2) | E. t (F), E.br (NF) |
Note: Total number of gene copies identified for each taxon is given in brackets next to the number of proposed functional gene copies. E.f = E. festucae, E. t = E. typhina, FGC1 = Fescue gene copy 1, E. br = E. bromicola, F = predicted functional gene, NF = predicted non-functional gene.
Comparison of mt genomes of analysed endophytes
| NC008068 | N/A | N/A | 24673 | 59.11 | - | |
| NEA22 | 4 | >800 | 93,968 | 15.52 | 90.7 | |
| NEA14 | 5 | >900 | 94,628 | 15.41 | 90.5 | |
| NEA16 | 1 | >1800 | 95,628 | 15.25 | 90.9 | |
| NEA20 | 5 | >1700 | 94,924 | 15.36 | 90.7 | |
| E34 | 4 | >2100 | 95,719 | 15.24 | 90.9 | |
| NEA18 | UNS | 4 | >1200 | 82,857 | 17.60 | 91.0 |
| NEA19 | UNS | 1 | >2400 | 83,619 | 17.44 | 90.7 |
| NEA23 | 4 | >2800 | 91,949 | 15.86 | 90.7 | |
| NEA21 | 1 | >700 | 91,820 | 15.88 | 90.8 | |
| 598829 | 1 | >2500 | 79,875 | 18.26 | 90.8 | |
| NEA17 | 2 | >1200 | 95,822 | 15.22 | 91.2 | |
| 598852 | 4 | >3800 | 96,481 | 15.12 | 91.2 | |
| E81 | 3 | >970 | 84,718 | 17.22 | 90.6 | |
| 9636 | 1 | >2600 | 85,030 | 17.15 | 90.6 | |
| 9340 | 2 | >2500 | 51,884 | 28.11 | 90.5 | |
| 9707 | 1 | >1400 | 61,133 | 23.86 | 89.9 | |
| | N/A | N/A | 69696 | 20.93 | 91.1 | |
| SE | N/A | N/A | 88738 | 16.44 | 91.0 | |
| NEA11 | N/A | N/A | 88810 | 16.42 | 91.1 | |
Figure 6Bootstrap consensus tree generated through maximum likelihood analysis of concatenated protein-coding gene sequences within the mitochondrial genomes of reference endophyte isolates and selected fescue endophytes. Diagram properties are as described for Figure 2. The tree was rooted by addition of the mt genome protein-coding gene complement of Metarhizium anisopliae.
Figure 7Summary of nuclear genome affinities between endophyte taxa. In the graphic, proposed progenitors are represented as species outside the box. Solid lines indicate the clear relationships with characterised progenitor species, while lower confidence relationships to uncharacterised progenitors are marked by dashed lines.