Literature DB >> 35109929

Epichloë scottii sp. nov., a new endophyte isolated from Melica uniflora is the missing ancestor of Epichloë disjuncta.

Torsten Thünen1, Yvonne Becker2, Murray P Cox3, Samad Ashrafi2.   

Abstract

Here we describe a new, haploid and stroma forming species within the genus Epichloë, as Epichloë scottii sp. nov. The fungus was isolated from Melica uniflora growing in Bad Harzburg, Germany. Phylogenetic reconstruction using a combined dataset of the tubB and tefA genes strongly support that E. scottii is a distinct species and the so far unknown ancestor species of the hybrid E. disjuncta. A distribution analysis showed a high infection rate in close vicinity of the initial sampling site and only two more spots with low infection rates. Genetic variations in key genes required for alkaloid production suggested that E. scottii sp. nov. might not be capable of producing any of the major alkaloids including ergot alkaloid, loline, indole-diterpene and peramine. All isolates and individuals found in the distribution analysis were identified as mating-type B explaining the lack of mature stromata during this study. We further release a telomere-to-telomere de novo assembly of all seven chromosomes and the mitogenome of E. scottii sp. nov.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alkaloid profile; BUSCO multigene-phylogeny; Epichloë; Melica uniflora; New species; Oxford nanopore; Telomere-to-telomere de novo genome assembly

Year:  2022        PMID: 35109929      PMCID: PMC8812020          DOI: 10.1186/s43008-022-00088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IMA Fungus        ISSN: 2210-6340            Impact factor:   3.515


INTRODUCTION

Epichloë species (Clavicipitaceae, Hypocreales) live in a pleiotropic, constitutive symbiosis with grasses of the subfamily Pooideae. During the vegetative state, they colonize the intercellular space of the aerial plant tissue without causing any visible pathogenic symptoms (Scott et al. 2012). Most species are capable of vertical transmission by infection of ovules of developing seeds (Schardl et al. 2004). For species reproducing asexualy, distribution via clonal growth by tillering of the host and seed transmission are the only ways of reproduction. For sexual morphs of Epichloë, horizontal transmission starts with a switch from restricted endobiotic to proliferative epibiotic growth. This results in the forming of stromata, which enclose the developing inflorescences causing the typical “choke disease” (Scott and Schardl 1993). The mating system of Epichloë is bipolar and heterothallic. Flies act as the vector and transfer spermatia to stromata of the opposite mating type. After karyogamy and meiosis, ascospores are ejected and infect new host plants. Most Epichloë species known only as an a asexual morph arose from interspecific hybridizations of different haploid Epichloë ancestors (Schardl 2010). The genus Epichloë currently comprises 15 haploid and 24 hybrid species (Leuchtmann et al. 2014; Leuchtmann et al. 2019; Campbell et al. 2017; Shymanovich et al. 2017; Tian et al. 2020) with E. sinensis, a hybrid of haploid species from the E. poae and the E. sibirica clades, being the latest addition (Tian et al. 2020). With the exception of the hybrid E. disjuncta, and the contributors of the “Lolium-associated clade” in certain hybrid species found in some Lolium spp., all ancestors of the described hybrid Epichloë spp. can be attributed to existing phylogenetic clades. For E. disjuncta, only one of the ancestors falls into a known clade related to endophytes of Brachipodium hosts (E. typhina or E. sylvatica) (Leuchtmann and Oberhofer 2013). The second ancestor was until now believed to be either extinct or not yet found. So far, there are 20 genomes of Epichloë available, representing 15 species. Only the genome of Epichloë festucae Fl1 is assembled on a chromosome level. It consists of seven chromosomes and one mitogenome with a genome size of 35 Mb and a GC content of 43.9% (Winter et al. 2018). There are several reports of Epichloë infecting grasses of the genus Melica. Epichloë tembladerae was found in M. stuckertii (Gentile et al. 2005), E. melicicola in M. racemose and M. decumbens (Moon et al. 2002) and E. guerinii infecting M. transsilvanica and M. ciliate (Moon et al. 2007). Melica uniflora, a perennial rhizomatous cool-season grass of tribe Meliceae that grows in shady places in Europe, northwards to Scotland and Southwest Finland and eastwards to Moldavia (Tutin et al. 2010) was until now not reported to be a host for Epichloë (White and Baldwin 1992; Wilson et al. 1991). In the “Butterberggelände” nature reserve in Bad Harzburg, Germany, several M. uniflora individuals showing stromata were found. The plants were sampled to isolate the fungal candidate causing the infection. Here we describe a new haploid Epichloë species isolated from M. uniflora, and report its telomere-to-telomere de novo genome assembly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biological materials/fungal isolation

Two M. uniflora individuals bearing stromata were collected in June 2020 in the “Butterberggelände” nature reserve (NSG BR 004) 51° 53′ 13.5″ N, 10° 34′ 36.9″ E. This is a melic grass / beech forest characterized by stony limestone weathered soils, which are well supplied with nutrients. One plant individual was sampled with attached roots and brought to the greenhouse, while the other only consisted of aerial tissue. The grasses were identified based on the flowering tillers and identity was confirmed using DNA-based identification techniques (see below). Endophytes were isolated from M. uniflora pseudostems according to “Basic Protocol 4”, described by Florea et al. (2015). Another isolation was made directly from the stroma of the greenhouse specimen by surface swab, followed by a series of subculturing steps.

Morphological examination

Fungal structures were examined and photographed using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 plus compound microscope and an Olympus SZX 12 stereo microscope equipped with a Jenoptik ProgRes® digital camera. Images were recorded using CapturePro 2.8 software (Jenoptic, Jena, Germany). Growing mycelia mounted in water, as well as slide cultures (Gams 1998) were used to illustrate fungal structures in different developmental stages. Nomarski Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) optics were used for observation and measurements. All measurements were obtaind from cultures growing on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Merck) and are given as × 1– × 2 (× 3 ± SD), with × 1 = minimum value observed, × 2 = maximum value observed, × 3 = average, and standard deviation (SD), followed by the number of measurements (n). Color changes of fungal structures formed in culture were checked using 3% potassium hydroxide (KOH) watery solution. Color codes used in the description were determined according to https://www.ral-farben.de/en/all-ral-colours.

Growth rate studies

Growth rates were determined at various temperatures from 5 to 35 °C at 5 °C intervals in the dark. Agar disks of 4 mm diam, excised from the margin of a young PDA culture were placed onto four replicate plates of PDA, cornmeal agar (CMA, Fluka), and yeast malt agar (YM: 3 g yeast extract, 3 g malt extract, 5 g peptone, 10 g glucose, 20 g agar, 1L deionized water). The colony diameter was measured weekly for a 4 wk period.

Confocal laser-scanning microscopy

Stromata and substromata samples were cut in approx. 0.1 cm cross sections by hand with a scalpel blade. Leaf sheath and blade samples were cut in 2 cm long subsamples. All samples were stained with Wheat Germ Agglutinin, Alexa Fluor™ 488 Conjugate (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA) and Aniline Blue diammonium salt (C37H32N5O9S3) and eventually with propidium iodide (both: Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Traufkirchen, Germany) as described by Becker et al. (2018). Samples were transferred to microscopic slides and embedded in staining solution for 10 min before microscopic examination. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was done using a Leica TCS SP8 as described in Becker et al. (2018).

Molecular studies

DNA extraction from single host plants and seeds was performed using DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the standard procedure according to the manufacturer. DNA extraction from individuals used for the distribution analysis was performed using the 96 well plate nexttec™ 1-Step Plant DNA Extraction kit (nexttec™ Biotechnologie, Germany) following the standard procedure provided by the manufacturer. Genomic DNA from fungal isolates was extracted by transferring roughly 1 cm2 of fresh mycelium grown on PDA to lysis buffer (150 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris–HCl, 1% sodium lauroyl sarcosine). After incubation at 70 °C for 30 min, DNA was isolated from the aqueous phase by sequential precipitations with 5 M potassium acetate and isopropanol followed by a washing step with 70% ethanol. Final DNA was resuspended in 50 μl of PCR-grade water. High molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA (gDNA) for genome sequencing was extracted using the modified protocol of Mayjonade et al. (2016). 2 × 15 mg of freeze-dried mycelium (grown as liquid culture in PD broth) were transferred to one 1.6 ml bead-tube filled with 140 mg ceramic beads (Ø1.4–1.6 mm) and 4 ceramic beads (Ø 2.6–2.8 mm) each. Tubes were cooled down in liquid nitrogen before and between 2 bead-beating steps for 15 s in BeadRupter (Biolabproducts, Germany) at speed 4.00. After addition of 600 µl of lysis-buffer (preheated to 65 °C) including RNase A, samples were incubated at 65 °C for 5 min until all mycelium was dissolved. Afterwards, samples were incubated at 50 °C for 30 min and mixed by inverting (20 times) every 10 min. After addition of 200 µl 5 M potassium acetate, samples were placed on ice to cool down and centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and 1 vol. of binding buffer and 1:18 (v:v) of Serapure beads solution were added followed by incubation at room temperature for 10 min in a rotary shaker. Tubes were placed on a magnetic rack for 1 h, supernatant was removed and beads were washed 2 times with 1 ml of wash solution. DNA was eluted by adding 100 µl of preheated (50 °C) elution buffer. DNA was cleaned using 1 vol. of bead-solution according to the protocol by Schalamun et al. (2019). DNA concentration was measured using Qubit and integrity of the DNA was checked on a 0.5% Agarose gel. Translation elongation factor 1-α (tefA), β-tubulin (tubB), calmodium M (calM) and internal transcribed spacers including 5.8S rDNA (ITS) loci were amplified using the primer pairs tef1-exon1d-1 and tef1-exon6u-1 (Craven et al. 2001), T1.1 and T1.2 (Young et al. 2005), cal-exon1d and cal-exon7u (Mc Cargo et al. 2014) and ITS5 and ITS 4 (White et al. 1990), respectively. For determination of the alkaloid profile and mating type a multiplex PCR was conducted as described by Charlton et al. (2014). PCR reactions for tefA, tubB, calM, ITS and multiplex PCR were performed in a total volume of 30 µl 1 × Green GoTaq™ Reaction Buffer, containing 3 ng DNA, 1.25 U GoTaq™ DNA Polymerase (Promega, Germany), 0.2 mM of each dNTP (Biozym Scientific, Germany), and 1 µM target-specific primers. The following thermal cycling parameters were used for both single target (tefA and tubB) and multiplex PCR: 94 °C for 1 min, then 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min followed by 72 °C for 10 min. Cycling parameter for calM were as followed: 94 °C for 2 min, then 40 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 50 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min followed by 72 °C for 10 min. For confirmation of identity of the host species, PCR reactions were performed to amplify ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) in a total volume of 30 µl 1 × Green GoTaq™ Reaction Buffer, containing 2 ng DNA, 1 U GoTaq™ DNA Polymerase (Promega), 0.3 mM of each dNTP (Biozym Scientific, Germany), and 0.5 µM each of rbcL_1_for and rbcL_1388_rev primers (Christin et al. 2008) using the following cycling parameters: 94 °C for 3 min, then 40 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 48 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min followed by 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products of tefA were cloned using pGEM®-T Easy Vector System I (Promega). For fungal isolates studied here (DSM111774, DSM111775 and DSM112488), a minimum of eight colonies per isolate containing the tefA sequences were sequenced with primers SP6 and T7. PCR products of ITS, tubB, calM and rbcL were sequenced using the same primers used for the PCR. Sequences obtained were assembled using CLC Main Workbench v20.0.4 (QIAGEN Aarhus A/S). Sequences obtained were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MZ147888, MZ147889, MZ147863, MZ198217-MZ198219, MZ224334-MZ224338, MZ438661-MZ438663.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

In order to create the dataset for a multigene phylogeny a search was conducted using the NCBI Nucleotide database. The search resulted in 800 and 1065 sequences of tefA and tubB, respectively. Sequences were extracted from the XML-files, combined in two separated FASTA-files for each gene. An additional file was created containing species name, accession number, gene, strain, isolate, and sequence definition. This file was used to find matching pairs regarding species and strain/isolate. Information on allele was added manually based on the information given in the sequence definition. A total of 438 sequences could be identified showing matching pairs of tefA and tubB. Both previously created datasets were reduced to those sequences. A subset was created containing one available individual of each species, subspecies and variation based on sequence length and quality. Details of the sequences used for the alignment can be found in the table of taxa (Table 1).
Table 1

Table of taxa. Sequences in the tefA and tubB alignments used for the multigene phylogeny

SpeciesIsolate numberAlleleHostLocGenbank accession NoReferences
tubBtefA
Claviceps purpurea20.1Secale cerealeKP689578HQ026480
Epichloë amarillansE4668Agrostis hyemalisN.AKF042042KP689563Schardl et al. (2013)
E. aotearoaee899Echinopogon ovatusNZKF042049KP689565Schardl et al. (2013)
E. australiensisAL1759fallele 1Dichelachne micranthaNZMN150703MN150705Leuchtmann et al. (2019)
E. australiensisAL1759pallele 2Dichelachne micranthaNZMN150704MN150706Leuchtmann et al. (2019)
E. baconii9707Agrostis tenuisCHKF811579KF811547Ekanayake et al. (2013)
E. brachyelytriE4804Brachyelytrum erectumUSKF042060KP689564Schardl et al. (2013)
E. bromicolaAL0426 2 E7561Thinopyrum intermediumKP689571KP689559
E. cabraliiBlaTG 2allele 1Bromus laevipesJX679191JX679184
E. cabraliiBlaTG 2allele 2Bromus laevipesJX679192JX679185
E. canadensisCWR 34allele 1Elymus canadensisMXKF719190KF719188Charlton et al. (2012)
E. canadensisCWR 34allele 2Elymus canadensisMXKF719191KF719189Charlton et al. (2012)
E. chisosa134allele 1Stipa eminensUSAF457471AF457509Moon et al. (2004)
E. chisosa134allele 2Stipa eminensUSAF457470AF457508Moon et al. (2004)
E. chisosa134allele 3Stipa eminensUSAF457472AF457510Moon et al. (2004)
E. coenophialaGreek type 1allele 1Lolium arundinaceumGRJX028244JX028257Takach et al. (2012)
E. coenophialaGreek type 1allele 2Lolium arundinaceumGRJX028245JX028258Takach et al. (2012)
E. coenophialaGreek type 1allele 3Lolium arundinaceumGRJX028246JX028259Takach et al. (2012)
E. coenophialae19allele 1Lolium arundinaceumKP689577KP689554
E. coenophialae19allele 2Lolium arundinaceumKP689576KP689566
E. coenophialae19allele 3Lolium arundinaceumKP689575KP689556
E. danicaD2 5allele 1Hordelymus europaeusDKJF718475JF718528Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. danicaD2 5allele 2Hordelymus europaeusDKJF718476JF718529Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. disjunctaA1 1allele 1Hordelymus europaeusITJF718437JF718490Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. disjunctaA1 1allele 2Hordelymus europaeusITJF718438JF718491Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. disjunctaA4 5allele 1Hordelymus europaeusITJF718440JF718493Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. disjunctaA4 5allele 2Hordelymus europaeusITJF718441JF718494Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. disjunctaC5a 1allele 1Hordelymus europaeusDEJF718469JF718522Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. disjunctaC5a 1allele 2Hordelymus europaeusDEJF718470JF718523Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. elymiATCC 201553Elymus virginicusAF062428AF457498
E. festucaeFl1 E894Festuca trachyphyllaNZKF042045KP689555Schardl et al. (2013)
E. festucae var. lolii15335Lolium perenneITKP834584KP834548Hettiarachchige et al. (2015)
E. gansuensisE7080Achnatherum inebriansCNKF042053KP689495Schardl et al. (2013)
E. glyceriaeE277Glyceria striataCAKF042046KP689560Schardl et al. (2013)
E. gueriniiCBS 113029allele 1Melica ciliataFREF422748-Moon et al. (2007)
E. gueriniiCBS 113029allele 2Melica ciliataFREF422749-Moon et al. (2007)
E. hordelymiA51 5allele 1Hordelymus europaeusITJF718442JF718495Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. hordelymiA51 5allele 2Hordelymus europaeusITJF718443JF718496Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. inebrianse7478Achnatherum inebriansKP689490KP689493
E. melicicola822allele 1Melica racemosaZAAF323383AF323404Moon et al. (2002)
E. melicicola822allele 2Melica racemosaZAAF323383-Moon et al. (2002)
E. mollisAL9924Holcus mollisKF042061KP689567Schardl et al. (2013)
E. novae-zelandiaeAL0725 2allele 1Poa matthewsiiNZMN013155MN013158Leuchtmann et al. (2019)
E. novae-zelandiaeAL0725 2allele 2Poa matthewsiiNZMN013154MN013157Leuchtmann et al. (2019)
E. novae-zelandiaeAL0725 2allele 3Poa matthewsiiNZMN013153MN013156Leuchtmann et al. (2019)
E. schardliiPA 10 10allele 1Poa alsodesUSMF156224KT749529Shymanovich et al. (2017)
E. schardliiPA 10 10allele 2Poa alsodesUSMF156223KT749530Shymanovich et al. (2017)
E. scottiiDSM112488Melica unifloraDEMZ198217MZ224336*
E. scottiiDSM111774Melica unifloraDEMZ198218MZ224334*
E. scottiiDSM111775Melica unifloraDEMZ198219MZ224335*
E. sibiricaMTI I03Achnatherum sibiricumCNFJ769412FJ769418Zhang et al. (2009)
E. siegeliiATCC 74483 type e915allele 1Festuca pratensisDEAF308139AF308132Craven et al. (2001)
E. siegeliiATCC 74483 type e915allele 2Festuca pratensisDEAF308138AF308133Craven et al. (2001)
E. sinensis57Aallele 1Festuca sinensisCNKX685661KX685663Tian et al. (2020)
E. sinensis57Aallele 2Festuca sinensisCNKX685660KX685662Tian et al. (2020)
E. stromatolongaChsa102Calamagrostis epigeiosCNKC463811KC463806
E. sylvaticaGR 10156 E7368Brachypodium sylvaticumKP689573KP689552-
E. sylvatica subsp. pollinensisA2 6Hordelymus europaeusITJF718439JF718492Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012)
E. tembladeraeni 269648allele 1Hordeum comosumKX154249KX173839
E. tembladeraeni 269648allele 2Hordeum comosumKX154248KX173838
E. typhina9340Poa pratenisCHKF811577KF811545Ekanayake et al. (2013)
E. typhinaE8Lolium perenneUSMF928013MF928030Campbell et al. (2017)
E. typhina subsp. poaeBlaTG 1Bromus laevipesJX679195JX679188
E. typhina var. aonikenkana2642Bromus setifoliusARKF534048KF534085Mc Cargo et al. (2014)
E. uncinataE81Festuca pratensisKF811583KF811551Ekanayake et al. (2013)

Locality (Loc.) is provided as ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code. N.A is used for North America. ‘–’ in the Reference (Ref.) column indicates unpublished sequences, * marks sequences obtained during this study

Table of taxa. Sequences in the tefA and tubB alignments used for the multigene phylogeny Locality (Loc.) is provided as ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code. N.A is used for North America. ‘–’ in the Reference (Ref.) column indicates unpublished sequences, * marks sequences obtained during this study Additionally, an exclusively tubB sequences dataset (tubB-only) was prepared based on the alignment published by Leuchtmann et al. (2014). The dataset was expanded by the tubB sequences generated here, both alleles from E. alsodes strain NY 12–14 (Shymanovich et al. 2017), E. hybrida strain NEA11 (Campbell et al. 2017), E. schardlii var. pennsylvanica PA 10 (Shymanovich et al. 2017), three alleles of E. novae-zelandiae strain AL0725 (Leuchtmann et al. 2019), and sequences of both alleles of E. sinensis 57A (Tian et al. 2020). DNA sequences were aligned using the online version of MAFFT v7 (Katoh et al. 2019; Kuraku et al. 2013) adopting the iterative refinement methods L-INS-i for both tubB and tefA genome regions used for the combined dataset, and FFT-NS-i for the adapted tubB-only dataset. Alignments were visually examined and their starts and ends were manually trimmed using AliView v. 1.26 (Larsson 2014). Phylogenetic analyses were applied using Bayesian Inference (BI), maximum-likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) for all datasets. The best-fit model of DNA substitution was estimated using MrModeltest v2.2 (Nylander 2004) under hierarchical likelihood ratio test (hLRT) and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The general time reversible model with gamma distributed substitution rates and invariate sites (GTR + I + G) and the symmetrical model with gamma distributed substitution rates and invariate sites (SYM + I + G) were selected as the best fitting model for the combined aligned dataset, under hLRT and AIC, respectively. Substitution models for the tubB-only dataset selected using MrModeltest were including K80 + G (hLRT) and K80 + I + G (AIC). For the multigene phylogeny, Bayesian analysis was performed using Metropolis Coupled Monte Carlo Markov chains (MCMCMC) based on both best fitting models settings in MrBayes v3.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). The process was run for 2,000,000 generations and trees were sampled every 500 generations. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was computed only from trees of the plateau, and if, additionally, the split frequencies were below 0.01. A total of 1701 trees representing the “burn-in phase” were discarded and the remaining trees were used to infer posterior probabilities (PP) for the nodes of the majority rule consensus tree. ML and NJ analyses were conducted as previously described (Ashrafi et al. 2017). For the tubB-only dataset, Bayesian analysis was executed through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling as described above. The number of generations was set at 3,000,000. A total of 2401 trees were discarded as burn-in and the remaining 3600 trees were used to calculate PP of the majority rule consensus tree. The phylograms were visualized using FigTree v1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree). The alignments and respective phylogenetic trees were uploaded in TreeBASE under the submission number: ID 28694 (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S28694). A third phylogenetic analysis was performed based on Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO). The dataset for this analysis comprised the genomes of all haploid species in the genus Epichloë that are available in the NCBI database, namely Epichloë amarillans E57 (NCBI accession number GCA_000223075.2), E. aotearoae E899 (GCA_000729855.1), E. baconii E1031 (GCA_000729845.1), E. brachyelytri E4804 (GCA_000222915.1), E. bromicola AL0434 (GCA_001008065.1), E. elymi E757 (GCA_002591845.1), E. festucae Fl1 (GCA_003814445.1), E. gansuensis E7080 (GCA_000222895.2), E. glyceriae E277 (GCA_000225285.2), E. inebrians E818 (GCA_000309355.1), E. mollis (E3601 (GCA_000729825.1), E. sylvatica E7368 (GCA_001008265.1) and E. typhina E8 (GCA_000308955.1), as well as the genome of the new species described here (isolate DSM112488) and two outgroup species, Claviceps paspali C7990 (GCA_000223175.2) and C. purpurea C20.1 (GCA_000347355.1). BUSCO v5.2.2 (Manni et al. 2021) was used to identify conserved gene orthologs independently in each species using the closest BUSCO reference database, hypocreales_odb10. Single copy ortholog protein sequences were passed to OrthoFinder v2.5.4 (Emms and Kelly 2019), which generated a maximum likelihood species phylogeny using RAxML-NG v1.0.3 (Kozlov et al. 2019) based on 2,828 orthologs with < 5% missingness across species. Branch support values were calculated using the Shimodaira-Hasegawa algorithm in FastTree v2.1.10 (Price et al. 2010) with 1000 × resampling.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using the previously isolated HMW gDNA following the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) Genomic DNA by Ligation protocol for the SQK-LSK110 Ligation Sequencing Kit (Version: GDE_9108_v110_revE_10Nov2020). Sequencing run was performed on a MinION 1B in a R10.3 Flow Cell for 72 h. Basecalling was performed on a NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier developer kit using ONT Guppy v5.0.11 and the r9.4.1 HAC model. Reads were corrected, trimmed and assembled using Canu (Koren et al. 2017) (snapshot v2.2-development + 149 changes (r10258)). Genome size was set to 38 Mb and the correctedErrorRate parameter was set to 0.039 for the assembly step. Polishing of the genome was performed by mapping high-coverage Nanopore long read data to the assembled genome using minimap2 v2.22 (Li 2018) and Pilon v1.24 (Walker et al. 2014). The genome was submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers CP083245-CP083252 and the corresponding BioProject PRJNA756890 and BioSample SAMN20929797 numbers. Repeat elements were identified with RepeatModeler v2.0.2a and RepeatMasker v4.1.2.p1, and their density across the genome was calculated with the ‘coverage’ function of bedtools v2.30.0.

Distribution analysis

To determine the distribution of the fungus studied here in the natural reserve “Butterberggelände”, M. uniflora grasses from seven areas evenly distributed along the reserve (sample sites B to H in Fig. 1) were collected at the end of August 2020. Each area had a radius of 5 m. Additionally an area with a radius of 0.5 m was sampled at the site where the initial stroma-bearing individuals had been detected (sample site A in Fig. 1). Within those areas, ten M. uniflora individuals with inflorescence and no visible stromata were collected and checked for the presence and mating type of Epichloë using tubB and mtAC/mtBA PCR amplification. Seeds of the samples were separated and checked for the presence of Epichloë using the same methodology mentioned earlier.
Fig. 1

Sample sites in the nature reserve”Butterberggelände “ in Bad Harzburg, Germany. Site A had a radius of 0.5 m; sites B to H had a radius of 5 m. Stromata bearing samples were discovered at sites A and E. For distribution analysis at each site, 10 specimens with inflorescences and no visible stromata were collected. Numbers in percent indicate the infection rate at the respective site. Scale bar is 500 m. Arrow indicates north. Map was created using blender (https://www.blender.org/) and BlenderGIS PlugIn (https://github.com/domlysz/BlenderGIS). Map data ©2020 Google

Sample sites in the nature reserve”Butterberggelände “ in Bad Harzburg, Germany. Site A had a radius of 0.5 m; sites B to H had a radius of 5 m. Stromata bearing samples were discovered at sites A and E. For distribution analysis at each site, 10 specimens with inflorescences and no visible stromata were collected. Numbers in percent indicate the infection rate at the respective site. Scale bar is 500 m. Arrow indicates north. Map was created using blender (https://www.blender.org/) and BlenderGIS PlugIn (https://github.com/domlysz/BlenderGIS). Map data ©2020 Google

Results

Two fungal strains DSM111774 and DSM111775 were isolated from surface sterilized pseudostems of the two Melica uniflora individuals sampled from sampling sites A and E (Fig. 1). Identity of the plant host was confirmed by rbcL gene sequence blast against the NCBI database. The specimen with roots was kept in the greenhouse of the Julius Kühn Institute, Braunschweig, Germany. Aerial tissue of this individual died off, but daughter ramets emerged from the rhizome, bearing developing stromata (Fig. 2b). The fungal strain DSM112488 was isolated directly from a developing stroma.
Fig. 2

Stromata on Melica uniflora (indicated by arrows) and growth in culture media. a Partial choking on a stroma bearing specimen of M. uniflora collected at sample site A. b Daughter ramets with stromata of the specimen collected at sample site A grown in the greenhouse. c Stromata on M. uniflora at sample site E. d, e Close-up images of a stroma on a daughter ramet grown in the greenhouse. Scale bars: 3 mm. f, g Isolate growing on PDA, top view (f) and bottom view (g). Bars = 2 cm

Stromata on Melica uniflora (indicated by arrows) and growth in culture media. a Partial choking on a stroma bearing specimen of M. uniflora collected at sample site A. b Daughter ramets with stromata of the specimen collected at sample site A grown in the greenhouse. c Stromata on M. uniflora at sample site E. d, e Close-up images of a stroma on a daughter ramet grown in the greenhouse. Scale bars: 3 mm. f, g Isolate growing on PDA, top view (f) and bottom view (g). Bars = 2 cm Partial as well as complete choking of the inflorescence on Melica uniflora was observed in the field and greenhouse (Fig. 2a–e). CLSM microscopic observations (Fig. 3) confirmed epibiotic and endobiotic growth of a fungus with similar growth phenotype as observed for other Epichloë species including E. elymi and E. typhina (Becker et al. 2016; Berry et al. 2021). Hyphae colonize the intercellular spaces of the plant’s aerial tissues forming a restricted hyphal net mostly parallel to the leaf’s axis, usually omitting host vascular bundle cells (Fig. 3g, h). Endobiotic hyphae formed plant exit structures, expressoria, to establish restricted epibiotic hyphal net on the leaf surface (Fig. 3b, e, f). During stroma formation of Epichloë spp. hyphae switch to prolific endobiotic and epibiotic growth and colonize host vascular bundles. This was also observed in the species described here (Fig. 3c, d).
Fig. 3

Photograph and confocal laser scanning micrographs of Epichloë scottii – Melica uniflora association. a Photograph of E. scottii stroma bearing reproductive tiller of M. uniflora. Letters indicate the leaf parts, where samples were taken for CLS microscopy. b–h confocal laser scanning micrographs. Samples were treated with aniline blue diammonium salt to stain fungal and plant cell wall β-glucans (overlay of stain and autofluorescence of cytoplasm depicted in yellow, orange pseudo colors) and wheat germ agglutinin-Alexa Fluor 488 (WGA-AF488) to stain fungal chitin (blue pseudo color) and with propidium iodide (f, g, only) to stain plant and fungal nuclei (yellow pseudo color). (b) epibiotic hyphae of E. scottii on the surface of the stem 2 cm below the base of stroma, maximum projection of 150 µm z-stack. (c) transverse section of unfertilized stroma tissue (st), maximum projection of 35 µm z-stack. d Higher magnification of (c) showing densely colonized vascular bundle (vb) and hyper-proliferative hyphal growth on the cuticle. e epibiotic hyphae of E. scottii on the leaf sheath. f epibiotic hyphae at point of exit of endobiotic hypha (e = expressorium), maximum projection of 9.4 µm z-stack. Only after several hyphal compartments are formed, chitin can be visualized by staining with WGA-AF488, depicted in blue pseudo color. g endobiotic hyphae of E. scottii in leaf sheath epidermis, maximum projection of 144 µm z-stack. h endobiotic hyphae of E. scottii in leaf blade, the channel for blue pseudocolor is overexposed to visualize chitin in septa of endobiotic hyphae, maximum projection of 12 µm z-stack. Septa in F, G, and H are marked with asterisks (*) and nuclei in (f) and (g) with hashes (#). Bars = 20 µm (e–h), 50 µm (b, d) 200 µm (c)

Photograph and confocal laser scanning micrographs of Epichloë scottii – Melica uniflora association. a Photograph of E. scottii stroma bearing reproductive tiller of M. uniflora. Letters indicate the leaf parts, where samples were taken for CLS microscopy. b–h confocal laser scanning micrographs. Samples were treated with aniline blue diammonium salt to stain fungal and plant cell wall β-glucans (overlay of stain and autofluorescence of cytoplasm depicted in yellow, orange pseudo colors) and wheat germ agglutinin-Alexa Fluor 488 (WGA-AF488) to stain fungal chitin (blue pseudo color) and with propidium iodide (f, g, only) to stain plant and fungal nuclei (yellow pseudo color). (b) epibiotic hyphae of E. scottii on the surface of the stem 2 cm below the base of stroma, maximum projection of 150 µm z-stack. (c) transverse section of unfertilized stroma tissue (st), maximum projection of 35 µm z-stack. d Higher magnification of (c) showing densely colonized vascular bundle (vb) and hyper-proliferative hyphal growth on the cuticle. e epibiotic hyphae of E. scottii on the leaf sheath. f epibiotic hyphae at point of exit of endobiotic hypha (e = expressorium), maximum projection of 9.4 µm z-stack. Only after several hyphal compartments are formed, chitin can be visualized by staining with WGA-AF488, depicted in blue pseudo color. g endobiotic hyphae of E. scottii in leaf sheath epidermis, maximum projection of 144 µm z-stack. h endobiotic hyphae of E. scottii in leaf blade, the channel for blue pseudocolor is overexposed to visualize chitin in septa of endobiotic hyphae, maximum projection of 12 µm z-stack. Septa in F, G, and H are marked with asterisks (*) and nuclei in (f) and (g) with hashes (#). Bars = 20 µm (e–h), 50 µm (b, d) 200 µm (c)

Sequence comparison and phylogenetic reconstructions

The combined dataset consisted of tefA (927 sites) and tubB (789 sites) partial sequences with a total length of 1716 base pairs (bp). The alignment comprised 65 taxa representing 33 species in the genus Epichloë and the species Claviceps purpurea as the outgroup. The DNA sequences of tubB and tefA obtained from the analyzed specimens of the Epichloë species studied here were identical between isolates. The topologies of the phylogenetic trees were identical without any conflict in supported groupings using Bayesian inference (Fig. 4), neighbor-joining or maximum likelihood. Strains of the fungus described here were highly supported as a monophyletic species group in all analyses, and clustered with E. disjuncta allele 1 in a well-supported clade. Tree topologies of BI analyses conducted based on substitution models were identical. Comparison of tubB and tefA between the strains studied here and E. disjuncta allele 1 showed a 100% identity for tubB and 99.2% and 99.0% identity for tefA of E. disjuncta strains A1_1 and C5a_1 and strain A4_5, respectively.
Fig. 4

Bayesian inference of the phylogenetic relationship of the fungus described here among Epichloë isolates based on tubB and tefA sequences using SYM + I + G as the nucleotide substitution model. Numbers above nodes are estimates of a posteriori probability (BIpp, ≥ 0.9), and bootstrap values of maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) (≥ 70%), respectively. The topology was rooted with the distantly related species Calviceps purpurea

Bayesian inference of the phylogenetic relationship of the fungus described here among Epichloë isolates based on tubB and tefA sequences using SYM + I + G as the nucleotide substitution model. Numbers above nodes are estimates of a posteriori probability (BIpp, ≥ 0.9), and bootstrap values of maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) (≥ 70%), respectively. The topology was rooted with the distantly related species Calviceps purpurea The tubB-only alignment consisted of 211 sequences with 599 sites. The sequences analyzed represented 39 known Epichloë species, 11 specimens of Epichloë spp., as well the Epichloë species described here. This analysis also showed that the strains examined here formed a highly supported clade together with E. disjuncta, providing sufficient phylogenetic resolution to distinguish this group from all other Epichloë groupings (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8

Bayesian inference of the phylogenetic relationship of tubB sequences of the taxa among Epichloë using K80 + I + G as nucleotide substitution model. Numbers above nodes are estimates of a posteriori probability (BIpp, ≥ 0.9). The strains studied here are in Bold. The tree was rooted as midpoint. Host species are provided after each strain

The phylogentic analysis based on 2,828 BUSCO single copy protein orthologs showed an early branching of the species described here after branching of the E. gansuensis and E. inebrians clade and before E. glyceriae (see Fig. 5). Based on the available data E. scottii forms an independent lineage within the genus Epichloë.
Fig. 5

Multi-gene phylogeny of haploid species of the genus Epichloë. A maximum likelihood phylogeny of all haploid species in the genus Epichloë with an available genome reference was built using 2,828 single copy protein orthologs and rooted on two species in the outgroup genus Claviceps. All branches have support values of 1

Multi-gene phylogeny of haploid species of the genus Epichloë. A maximum likelihood phylogeny of all haploid species in the genus Epichloë with an available genome reference was built using 2,828 single copy protein orthologs and rooted on two species in the outgroup genus Claviceps. All branches have support values of 1

TAXONOMY

T. Thünen, Y. Becker, M.P. Cox & S. Ashrafi, sp. nov. MycoBank No.: MB840953. Figure 6
Fig. 6

Micrographs of Epichloë scottii on potato dextrose agar. a, b Fungal growth and formation of coiling hyphae. c, d Hyphal anastomosis. e developing hyphae bearing conidiogenous cells and conidia. f Growing hyphae forming ring, conidiogenous cells arising from hyphae and conidia, g details of conidiogenous cells bearing conidia. h conidia. Bars = 10 µm

Etymology: In honor of Barry Scott recognizing his outstanding works on the genus Epichloë. Diagnosis: Epichloë scottii is characterized by small-sized conidia, short-length conidiogenous cells and moderate growth rate. The fungus develops conidiogenous cells (14.1 ± 2.8 µm) that are shorter that those of E. disjuncta (33.8 ± 7.3 µm). Sequence comparison of tubB and tefA between the E. scottii and E. disjuncta allele 1 showed a 100% identity for tubB and 99.2% and 99.0% identity for tefA of E. disjuncta strains A1_1 and C5a_1 and strain A4_5, respectively. Type: Germany: Bad Harzburg, a dried biologically inert culture on PDA, originating from a single conidium of an immature individual stroma from “Butterberggelände” nature reserve developed on Melica uniflora maintained in a greenhouse, Sept. 2020, isol. S. Ashrafi & T. Thünen, BB005 (B 70 0,100,236 – holotype; dried plant materials bearing the immature stroma used for fungal isolation); DSM112488 – isotype culture. GenBank accession nos.: ITS: MZ147888; tefA: MZ224335; tubB: MZ198219; calM: MZ438661. Additional material examined: Germany: Bad Harzburg, isolated from surface sterilized leaves of Melica uniflora, May 2019. isol. T. Thünen (DSM111774), GenBank: MZ147889 (ITS); MZ224334 (tefA); MZ198218 (tubB); MZ438662 (calM); ibid. (DSM111775) GenBank: MZ147863 (ITS); MZ224335 (tefA); MZ198219 (tubB); MZ438663 (calM). Description: Infested plants bearing immature stromata. Stromata cylindrical, variable in size, 13–29 mm long, white to lemon-yellow with age. Colonies moderately growing, on PDA at 20 °C reaching 7–8 mm diam (7 d), 14–16 mm diam (14 d), and 26–27 mm diam (21 d); optimum temperature for growth 20 °C; at 5 °C 1 mm (21 d), at 30 °C 3–4 mm (21 d). Optimum temperature for growth on other examined culture media at 20 °C, reaching 30–31 mm diam (CMA, after 21 d), 38–32 mm (YM, after 21 d); no growth observed at 35 °C. Colonies on PDA elevated centrally, surface smooth with dense aerial mycelium, cottony white in the central part to pale creamy at the margin, margins wide and flattened, reverse natural yellow (RAL 095 85 50) in the central part to asparagus-yellow (RAL 095 80 30) at the margin, no exudates, no medium staining (Fig. 2f, g). Hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, septate, forming strands or coils, occasionally anastomosed, bearing the conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, arising solitary from hyphae, hyaline, cylindrical at the base, gradually tapering towards the apex, separated by a basal septum, variable in length, 8.2–22.6 µm (14.1 ± 2.8) long and 1.5–3.5 µm (2.5 ± 0.4) wide at the base (n = 65). Conidia ellipsoid to ovoid, hyaline, smooth, aseptate, 3.5–5.6 × 2.4–3.6 µm (4.5 ± 0.4 × 3.0 ± 0.25) (n = 85) (Fig. 6). Host: Only from Melica uniflora. Distribution: At the end of August 2020, 80 individuals of M. uniflora with inflorescences but no visible stromata were collected at eight sites along a transect in the “Butterberggelände” nature reserve (Fig. 1). The survey resulted in discovery of 18 M. uniflora individuals infected with Epichloë scottii. The distribution is shown in Fig. 1 with the numbers showing the percentage infection rate observed at each sample site. Beyond the initial sample sites A and E, infected M. uniflora was only observed at sites G (10% infection rate) and H (20% infection rate). Because sampling was conducted quite late in the year, the majority of seeds had already fallen. Only four fully developed seeds were recovered from infected individuals. Sequencing results of the seed samples confirmed the presence of E. scottii. Discussion: According to phylogenetic inference (Fig. 4), E. scottii is closely related to but distinct from E. disjuncta. Both taxa form moderately growing colonies on PDA. Epichloë scottii develops ellipsoid to ovoid and small size conidia (4.5 × 3.0 µm) whereas E. disjuncta forms medium-sized conidia (6.9 × 2.7 µm) that are lunate to reniform and often bear an apiculum-like bulge at the base. They also differ in the length of the conidiogenous cells. Epichloë scottii develops conidiogenous cells (14.1 ± 2.8 µm) that are shorter that those of E. disjuncta (33.8 ± 7.3 µm). Although E. scottii was originally isolated from M. uniflora, E. disjuncta was reported from Hordelymus europaeus (Leuchtmann and Oberhofer 2013). Among non-hybrid species studied by Leuchtmann and Oberhofer (2013), E. scottii and E. sylvatica subsp. pollinensis form conidia and conidiogenous cells that are morphometrically similar, however the difference between these species is strongly supported by sequence and genomic comparison (Figs. 4, 5). Micrographs of Epichloë scottii on potato dextrose agar. a, b Fungal growth and formation of coiling hyphae. c, d Hyphal anastomosis. e developing hyphae bearing conidiogenous cells and conidia. f Growing hyphae forming ring, conidiogenous cells arising from hyphae and conidia, g details of conidiogenous cells bearing conidia. h conidia. Bars = 10 µm Initial assembly of the genome resulted in 22 contigs. Six contigs resembled complete chromosomes with telomeres on both ends. Two contigs, each with one telomere showed ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats at the broken ends. These two contigs therefore represent a single chromosome broken on the rDNA locus and were joined together. In order to clean up the rDNA locus two partial rDNA units at the flanks of the rDNA locus were identified, together with two complete rDNA repeats in between. One contig was identified as a broken copy of the rDNA locus and could therefore be excluded. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was present in one contig, which the assembler had identified as a circular DNA. The sequence was reordered to start at the canonical mtDNA start site. The contig contained two copies of the mtDNA genome, so the first copy was retained and the second copy deleted. The assembler identified 11 contigs as bubbles. Mapping of these contigs to the chromosomes identified high identity matches and the contigs could therefore be excluded. One small contig (3510 bp) could not be matched to the other contigs. An NCBI blast search showed that this contig is a contaminant from Escherichia coli, likely part of a cloning vector. This contig can therefore be safely excluded, as it is not an Epichloë sequence. Telomeres were trimmed to the nearest canonical repeat (TAACCC) at both ends of each chromosome. Chromosomes were sorted by length from largest to smallest. The overall length of the genome after the polishing step is 37.4 Mb distributed over seven chromosomes and one mitogenome. The overall GC content of the chromosomes is 42.9%. The length of the individual chromosomes as well as their GC content can be found in Fig. 7. The length of the mitogenome is 94,060 bp and its GC content 27.7%.
Fig. 7

Karyogram of the seven chromosomes of Epichloë scottii. Individual size and GC content is given below each chromosome. Grayscale indicates the density of repeat elements from low (white) to high (back)

Karyogram of the seven chromosomes of Epichloë scottii. Individual size and GC content is given below each chromosome. Grayscale indicates the density of repeat elements from low (white) to high (back)

Genetic variation

All isolates showed the same genotype regarding key genes required for alkaloid production and mating type idiomorphs (Table 2). No genes involved in the biosynthesis of ergot alkaloids and lolines could be detected by Multiplex PCR according to the method of Charlton et al. (2014). Only two indole-diterpene genes (idtF and idtQ) showed a PCR fragment of the expected size. Regarding peramine, all strains were positive for the perA 5′ region and the perA reductase domain, but the perA T2 domain was not detected. PCR markers for determination of the mating-type identified all strains as mating-type B. Presence and absence of genes involved in the alkaloid biosynthesis could be confirmed by crosscheck with the genome assembly of E. scottii.
Table 2

Alkaloid profile and mating type of Epichloë scottii

Alkaloid/mating typeGeneE. scottii DSM112488E. scottii DSM111774E. scottii DSM111775
Ergot alkaloidsdmaW
easC
easA
cloA
lpsB
Indole-diterpenesidtG
ltmJ
idtQ+++
idtF+++
idtK
LolineslolC
lolA
lolO
lolP
PeramineperA-5+++
perA-T2
perA-R+++
Mating typemtAC
mtBA+++

Genes for ergot alkaloid, indole-diterpene and loline biosynthesis are displayed in order of their involvement in the corresponding biosynthesis pathway. For peramine, which is encoded by a single gene, gene fragments are ordered from the 5′ to 3′ end of each gene part

Alkaloid profile and mating type of Epichloë scottii Genes for ergot alkaloid, indole-diterpene and loline biosynthesis are displayed in order of their involvement in the corresponding biosynthesis pathway. For peramine, which is encoded by a single gene, gene fragments are ordered from the 5′ to 3′ end of each gene part

DISCUSSION

Here we report the first occurrence of an Epichloë endophyte in Melica uniflora. Comparative morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidences indicates it is a new species, given the name Epichloë scottii here. Variation in tubB and tefA sequences compared to other haploid Epichloë species strongly supported that E. scottii is a distinct and monophyletic species in the genus. Phylogenetic analysis and sequence comparison suggests that E. scottii is one of the progenitor species of E. disjuncta (Leuchtmann and Oberhofer 2013), formerly known as Neotyphodium sp. HeuTG-3, and first described by Oberhofer and Leuchtmann (2012). Epichloë disjuncta is a hybrid Epichloë species isolated from the European woodland grass Hordelymus europaeus. Melica uniflora and H. europaeus share the same habitat. In a survey of 44 Querco-Fageta woods north of the Harz Mountains in Germany, H. europaeus could be identified in 16 areas, all of which harbor M. uniflora as well (Zacharias 1993). The second ancestral species of E. disjuncta is related to endophytes of Brachypodium hosts (E. typhina or E. sylvatica) (Leuchtmann and Oberhofer 2013). In the survey of Zacharias (1993), B. sylvaticum was identified in 43 of the 44 woods. This places both hosts of the putative ancestral species and the host of the resulting hybrid in the same habitat. A third phylogenetic analysis based on a total of 2,828 single copy protein orthologs was conducted. Accordingly E. scottii was placed as an early branching species within the genus Epichloë. The genus of the host of E. scottii, Melica, is itself an early branching genus within the subfamily Pooidae (Saarela et al. 2018) suggesting a co-evolution of fungus and its host as described by Schardl et al. (2008). Sequencing results of PCR products showed only single alleles of the genes tubB, tefA, calM and the ITS region in all isolates. Therefore, E. scottii is considered a haploid Epichloë species. The BUSCO results from the genome analysis labeled almost all genes (> 99.7%) as single copy, also supporting this new species being haploid. The size of the conidia, which is comparable to other haploid Epichloë species (Kuldau et al. 1999) is another strong indicator for the haploid nature of E. scottii. Epichloë species are heterothallic. For successful fertilization of the stromata they require spermatia or ascogonia from individuals of the opposite mating type, which are transmitted via vectors such as female flies of the genus Botanophila (Bultman and Leuchtmann 2003). No stromata on M. uniflora discovered during this study showed any sign of fertilization (no sign of embedded perithecia). Molecular analysis of all E. scottii isolates and of individuals found in the infected grasses identified them as mating type B. No individuals of mating type A have been observed in this population so far. This explains the lack of fertilized stromata. No genes for the biosynthesis of ergot alkaloids and lolines could be detected. As the presence of these marker genes is highly correlated to alkaloid production in planta (Charlton et al. 2014), E. scottii is unlikely to produce either of these alkaloids. Only two genes involved in the biosynthesis of indole-diterpenes could be detected (idtQ and idfF): idtG, the first gene involved in the biosynthesis pathway (Schardl et al. 2013), is missing which makes it unlikely that E. scottii is able to produce any indole-diterpenes. For peramine, the marker for the T2 domain is missing. Preliminary results of the draft genome analysis showed a deletion of 2130 bp, which includes the T2 domain but also the M domain and the C-terminal subunit of the A2 domain. Due to this, neither the selection and activation of the arginine substrate, which requires the A2 C-subunit, nor the tethering or methylation of the activated arginyl residue, which requires the T2 and M domains, can be performed by the encoded protein (Tanaka et al. 2005). Based on this, the fungus described here is most likely not able to produce peramine or any other pyrrolopyrazine product. In addition to horizontal transmission, most Epichloë endophytes can transmit vertically via the seeds of their hosts. DNA extraction from seeds of infected M. uniflora individuals, followed by PCR and sequencing showed the presence of E. scottii. This suggests that E. scottii is capable of vertical transmission. Further investigations, including microscopy of seeds of E. scottii infected plants is necessary to verify these findings. The original host of E. scottii strain DSM111774 was brought to the greenhouse where it developed several daughter ramets, which subsequently all developed stromata. This shows that the endophyte is capable of transmission via rhizomes. For rhizomatous Festuca ruba, clonal growth via rhizomes can reach up to 220 m (Harberd 1961). Sample sites A and E were only 15 m apart, which makes it possible that E. scottii strains DSM111774 and DSM111775 originated from the same host individual. This study showed that E. scottii can be transmitted vertically via clonal growth of its host and seeds. It further develops stromata in its host plants, indicating horizontal transmission of the fungus. However due to the lack of the opposite mating type development of ascospores and sexual life-cycle were not observed. Collectively, this evidence suggests E. scottii is a pleiotropic symbiont (Schardl et al. 1997), which can be classified as a Type II endophyte according to Clay and Schardl (2002).

CONCLUSION

In this study we described a new, haploid and stroma forming species within the genus Epichloë, Epichloë scottii sp. nov. which was isolated from Melica uniflora growing in Bad Harzburg, Germany. Phylogenic analysis revealed E. scottii as the unknown ancestor species of the hybrid E. disjuncta and placed it as an early branching species within the genus Epichloë. We further released a telomere-to-telomere de novo assembly of all seven chromosomes and the mitogenome of E. scottii.
  43 in total

Review 1.  Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes.

Authors:  Christopher L Schardl; Adrian Leuchtmann; Martin J Spiering
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

2.  Molecular cloning and genetic analysis of a symbiosis-expressed gene cluster for lolitrem biosynthesis from a mutualistic endophyte of perennial ryegrass.

Authors:  C A Young; M K Bryant; M J Christensen; B A Tapper; G T Bryan; B Scott
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Epichloe canadensis, a new interspecific epichloid hybrid symbiotic with Canada wildrye (Elymus canadensis).

Authors:  Nikki D Charlton; Kelly D Craven; Shipra Mittal; Andrew A Hopkins; Carolyn A Young
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses.

Authors:  Keith Clay; Christopher Schardl
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Taxonomy, diversity and origins of symbiotic endophytes of Achnatherum sibiricum in the Inner Mongolia Steppe of China.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; An-Zhi Ren; Yu-Kun Wei; Feng Lin; Chuan Li; Zhi-Jian Liu; Yu-Bao Gao
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Currencies of mutualisms: sources of alkaloid genes in vertically transmitted epichloae.

Authors:  Christopher L Schardl; Carolyn A Young; Juan Pan; Simona Florea; Johanna E Takach; Daniel G Panaccione; Mark L Farman; Jennifer S Webb; Jolanta Jaromczyk; Nikki D Charlton; Padmaja Nagabhyru; Li Chen; Chong Shi; Adrian Leuchtmann
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets.

Authors:  Anders Larsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Ijuhya vitellina sp. nov., a novel source for chaetoglobosin A, is a destructive parasite of the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi.

Authors:  Samad Ashrafi; Soleiman Helaly; Hans-Josef Schroers; Marc Stadler; Katja R Richert-Poeggeler; Abdelfattah A Dababat; Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics.

Authors:  David M Emms; Steven Kelly
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Alexey M Kozlov; Diego Darriba; Tomáš Flouri; Benoit Morel; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  2 in total

1.  Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Sequences across a Single Genus Reveal Highly Variable Chromosome Rearrangement Rates but Absolute Stasis of Chromosome Number.

Authors:  Mathieu Quenu; Artemis D Treindl; Kate Lee; Daigo Takemoto; Torsten Thünen; Samad Ashrafi; David Winter; Austen R D Ganley; Adrian Leuchtmann; Carolyn A Young; Murray P Cox
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25

2.  Identification of Three Epichloë Endophytes from Hordeum bogdanii Wilensky in China.

Authors:  Tian Wang; Taixiang Chen; James F White; Chunjie Li
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.