Ronald L Hickman1, Melissa D Pinto. 1. Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the relationships between advance directive status, demographic characteristics and decisional burden (role stress and depressive symptoms) of surrogate decision-makers (SDMs) of patients with chronic critical illness. BACKGROUND: Although the prevalence of advance directives among Americans has increased, SDMs are ultimately responsible for complex medical decisions of the chronically critically ill patient. Decisional burden has lasting psychological effects on SDMs. There is insufficient evidence on the influence of advance directives on the decisional burden of surrogate decision-makers of patients with chronic critical illness. DESIGN: The study was a secondary data analysis of cross-sectional data. Data were obtained from 489 surrogate decision-makers of chronically critically ill patients at two academic medical centres in Northeast Ohio, United States, between September 2005-May 2008. METHODS: Data were collected using demographic forms and questionnaires. A single-item measure of role stress and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD) scale were used to capture the SDM's decisional burden. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square and path analyses were performed. RESULTS: Surrogate decision-makers who were nonwhite, with low socioeconomic status and low education level were less likely to have advance directive documentation for their chronically critically ill patient. The presence of an advance directive mitigates the decisional burden by directly reducing the SDM's role stress and indirectly lessening the severity of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most SDMs of chronically critically ill patients will not have the benefit of knowing the patient's preferences for life-sustaining therapies and consequently be at risk of increased decisional burden. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Study results are clinically useful for patient education on the influence of advance directives. Patients may be informed that SDMs without advance directives are at risk of increased decisional burden and will require decisional support to facilitate patient-centred decision-making.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the relationships between advance directive status, demographic characteristics and decisional burden (role stress and depressive symptoms) of surrogate decision-makers (SDMs) of patients with chronic critical illness. BACKGROUND: Although the prevalence of advance directives among Americans has increased, SDMs are ultimately responsible for complex medical decisions of the chronically critically ill patient. Decisional burden has lasting psychological effects on SDMs. There is insufficient evidence on the influence of advance directives on the decisional burden of surrogate decision-makers of patients with chronic critical illness. DESIGN: The study was a secondary data analysis of cross-sectional data. Data were obtained from 489 surrogate decision-makers of chronically critically ill patients at two academic medical centres in Northeast Ohio, United States, between September 2005-May 2008. METHODS: Data were collected using demographic forms and questionnaires. A single-item measure of role stress and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD) scale were used to capture the SDM's decisional burden. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square and path analyses were performed. RESULTS: Surrogate decision-makers who were nonwhite, with low socioeconomic status and low education level were less likely to have advance directive documentation for their chronically critically ill patient. The presence of an advance directive mitigates the decisional burden by directly reducing the SDM's role stress and indirectly lessening the severity of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most SDMs of chronically critically ill patients will not have the benefit of knowing the patient's preferences for life-sustaining therapies and consequently be at risk of increased decisional burden. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Study results are clinically useful for patient education on the influence of advance directives. Patients may be informed that SDMs without advance directives are at risk of increased decisional burden and will require decisional support to facilitate patient-centred decision-making.
Authors: Sharon L Camhi; Alice F Mercado; R Sean Morrison; Qingling Du; David M Platt; Gary I August; Judith E Nelson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Christopher E Cox; Tereza Martinu; Shailaja J Sathy; Alison S Clay; Jessica Chia; Alice L Gray; Maren K Olsen; Joseph A Govert; Shannon S Carson; James A Tulsky Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Elizabeth K Vig; Helene Starks; Janelle S Taylor; Elizabeth K Hopley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lakshmipathi Chelluri; Kyung Ah Im; Steven H Belle; Richard Schulz; Armando J Rotondi; Michael P Donahoe; Carl A Sirio; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Michael R Pinsky Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Deborah Ejem; Andres Azuero; Richard A Taylor; Gabrielle B Rocque; Yasemin Turkman; Moneka A Thompson; Sara J Knight; Michelle Y Martin; Marie A Bakitas Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Daisy J M Ermers; Marit P H van Beuningen-van Wijk; Evi Peters Rit; Sonja C Stalpers-Konijnenburg; Diana G Taekema; Frank H Bosch; Yvonne Engels; Patricia J W B van Mierlo Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.921