Jared Chiarchiaro1,2, Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk2, Robert M Arnold3, Douglas B White2,4,5. 1. 1 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine. 2. 2 Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center. 3. 3 Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine. 4. 4 Center for Bioethics and Health Law, and. 5. 5 Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Although numerous studies have documented that family members in intensive care units struggle with end-of-life decisions for incapacitated patients, there is little information about whether prior advance care planning lessens the burden of decision making. OBJECTIVES: We sought to measure decisional conflict in surrogates of critically ill patients and to examine whether prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict. METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study done at five U.S. academic medical centers that included 471 surrogates of 257 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The main outcome was surrogates' burden of decision making as measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Surrogates completed a questionnaire item addressing whether they had had any prior advance care planning conversations with their loved ones. We used multilevel linear regression modeling to measure the association between decisional conflict and advance care planning. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Moderate or high levels of decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale score≥25) were present in 48% of surrogates. After adjusting for potential confounders, surrogates who had engaged in prior advance care planning conversations had significantly lower levels of decisional conflict than those who had not (mean score 3.3 points lower on the Decisional Conflict Scale; 95% confidence interval, -6.4 to -0.2; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of surrogates for critically ill patients have moderate or high levels of decisional conflict. Prior advance care planning was associated with less decisional conflict. These results suggest that the scope of the benefit of advance care planning may extend beyond respecting patients' wishes to also ameliorating the burden on patients' loved ones who act as surrogates.
RATIONALE: Although numerous studies have documented that family members in intensive care units struggle with end-of-life decisions for incapacitated patients, there is little information about whether prior advance care planning lessens the burden of decision making. OBJECTIVES: We sought to measure decisional conflict in surrogates of critically illpatients and to examine whether prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict. METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study done at five U.S. academic medical centers that included 471 surrogates of 257 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The main outcome was surrogates' burden of decision making as measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Surrogates completed a questionnaire item addressing whether they had had any prior advance care planning conversations with their loved ones. We used multilevel linear regression modeling to measure the association between decisional conflict and advance care planning. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Moderate or high levels of decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale score≥25) were present in 48% of surrogates. After adjusting for potential confounders, surrogates who had engaged in prior advance care planning conversations had significantly lower levels of decisional conflict than those who had not (mean score 3.3 points lower on the Decisional Conflict Scale; 95% confidence interval, -6.4 to -0.2; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of surrogates for critically illpatients have moderate or high levels of decisional conflict. Prior advance care planning was associated with less decisional conflict. These results suggest that the scope of the benefit of advance care planning may extend beyond respecting patients' wishes to also ameliorating the burden on patients' loved ones who act as surrogates.
Authors: M Danis; E Mutran; J M Garrett; S C Stearns; R T Slifkin; L Hanson; J F Williams; L R Churchill Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Leslie P Scheunemann; Natalie C Ernecoff; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Shannon S Carson; Catherine L Hough; J Randall Curtis; Wendy G Anderson; Jay Steingrub; Bernard Lo; Michael Matthay; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Eric D Hansen; Mary M Mitchell; Dulce M Cruz Oliver; Fahid A Alghanim; Michelle Walter; Amy A Case; Tom Smith; Amy R Knowlton Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Kristen E Pecanac; Roger L Brown; Jay Steingrub; Wendy Anderson; Michael A Matthay; Douglas B White Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-07-07
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Deborah Ejem; Andres Azuero; Richard A Taylor; Gabrielle B Rocque; Yasemin Turkman; Moneka A Thompson; Sara J Knight; Michelle Y Martin; Marie A Bakitas Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Andrea Paiva; Colleen A Redding; Lynne Iannone; Maria Zenoni; John R O'Leary; Terri R Fried Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Laura A Petrillo; Ryan D McMahan; Victoria Tang; Daniel Dohan; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jeffrey D Edwards; Howard B Panitch; Maureen George; Anne-Marie Cirrilla; Eli Grunstein; Joanne Wolfe; Judith E Nelson; Rachel L Miller Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2020-12-23