Literature DB >> 19770733

Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Christopher E Cox1, Tereza Martinu, Shailaja J Sathy, Alison S Clay, Jessica Chia, Alice L Gray, Maren K Olsen, Joseph A Govert, Shannon S Carson, James A Tulsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare prolonged mechanical ventilation decision-makers' expectations for long-term patient outcomes with prospectively observed outcomes and to characterize important elements of the surrogate-physician interaction surrounding prolonged mechanical ventilation provision. Prolonged mechanical ventilation provision is increasing markedly despite poor patient outcomes. Misunderstanding prognosis in the prolonged mechanical ventilation decision-making process could provide an explanation for this phenomenon.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 126 patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants were interviewed at the time of tracheostomy placement about their expectations for 1-yr patient survival, functional status, and quality of life. These expectations were then compared with observed 1-yr outcomes measured with validated questionnaires. The 1-yr follow-up was 100%, with the exception of patient death or cognitive inability to complete interviews. At 1 yr, only 11 patients (9%) were alive and independent of major functional status limitations. Most surrogates reported high baseline expectations for 1-yr patient survival (n = 117, 93%), functional status (n = 90, 71%), and quality of life (n = 105, 83%). In contrast, fewer physicians described high expectations for survival (n = 54, 43%), functional status (n = 7, 6%), and quality of life (n = 5, 4%). Surrogate-physician pair concordance in expectations was poor (all kappa = <0.08), as was their accuracy in outcome prediction (range = 23%-44%). Just 33 surrogates (26%) reported that physicians discussed what to expect for patients' likely future survival, general health, and caregiving needs.
CONCLUSIONS: One-year patient outcomes for prolonged mechanical ventilation patients were significantly worse than expected by patients' surrogates and physicians. Lack of prognostication about outcomes, discordance between surrogates and physicians about potential outcomes, and surrogates' unreasonably optimistic expectations seem to be potentially modifiable deficiencies in surrogate-physician interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770733      PMCID: PMC2766420          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ab86ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  46 in total

1.  Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Jean Carlet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.

Authors:  John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units.

Authors:  Douglas B White; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Bernard Lo; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill.

Authors:  C M Lilly; D L De Meo; L A Sonna; K J Haley; A F Massaro; R F Wallace; S Cody
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference.

Authors:  Neil R MacIntyre; Scott K Epstein; Shannon Carson; David Scheinhorn; Kent Christopher; Sean Muldoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Health values of the seriously ill. SUPPORT investigators.

Authors:  J Tsevat; E F Cook; M L Green; D B Matchar; N V Dawson; S K Broste; A W Wu; R S Phillips; R K Oye; L Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Prolonged acute mechanical ventilation, hospital resource utilization, and mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Rose S Luippold; Sandra Sulsky; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Growth in adult prolonged acute mechanical ventilation: implications for healthcare delivery.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Marjolein de Wit; Jason R Pirone; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  99 in total

Review 1.  Integration of palliative care in chronic critical illness management.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Aluko A Hope
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Susan J Lee Char; Leah R Evans; Grace L Malvar; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Long-term acute care hospital utilization after critical illness.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Nicole M Benson; Dina Appleby; Shannon S Carson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Christopher E Cox; Aluko A Hope; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  Setting the vision: applied patient-reported outcomes and smart, connected digital healthcare systems to improve patient-centered outcomes prediction in critical illness.

Authors:  Nicholas G Wysham; Amy P Abernethy; Christopher E Cox
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

6.  Home discharge following critical illness: A qualitative analysis of family caregiver experience.

Authors:  JiYeon Choi; Jennifer H Lingler; Michael P Donahoe; Mary Beth Happ; Leslie A Hoffman; Judith A Tate
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients.

Authors:  Andrew M Courtwright; Joshua Abrams; Ellen M Robinson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Risk factors for long-term brain dysfunction after chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Aluko A Hope; R Sean Morrison; Qingling Du; Sylvan Wallenstein; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2013-08

9.  A scenario-based, randomized trial of patient values and functional prognosis on intensivist intent to discuss withdrawing life support.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Jenna R Krall; A Parker Ruhl; J Randall Curtis; Scott D Halpern; Bryan M Lau; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  The feasibility of measuring frailty to predict disability and mortality in older medical intensive care unit survivors.

Authors:  Matthew R Baldwin; M Cary Reid; Amanda A Westlake; John W Rowe; Evelyn C Granieri; Hannah Wunsch; Thuy-Tien Dam; Daniel Rabinowitz; Nathan E Goldstein; Mathew S Maurer; David J Lederer
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.