Literature DB >> 24328902

A 30-day risk assessment of mastectomy alone compared to immediate breast reconstruction (IBR).

John P Fischer1, Charles T Tuggle, Alex Au, Stephen J Kovach.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is emerging as a favourable reconstruction option for breast cancer patients. Understanding the factors associated with complications following IBR will enhance care delivery, risk counselling and management, and potentially improve patient satisfaction. Women undergoing mastectomy alone and mastectomy with IBR from 2005-2011 were identified in the ACS-NSQIP datasets. Specific complications examined included surgical (flap or prosthesis loss and unplanned reoperation), wound (superficial/deep surgical site infection and wound dehiscence), and medical complications. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of outcomes. A total of 47,443 patients were identified. For patients who underwent IBR compared to mastectomy alone, total complications (11.2% vs 9.2%, p < 0.001) and surgical complications (7.8% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001) were more frequent. In adjusted analysis, a common predictor of complications was class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) for mastectomy alone (OR = 1.79, p < 0.001) and implant-based IBR (OR = 2.20, p < 0.001), and class II obesity (BMI 35-39.9) for autologous IBR (OR = 1.62, p = 0.003). Wound complications were found to be associated with autologous reconstruction (p < 0.001 kg/m(2)), smoking (p < 0.001), bilateral procedures (p = 0.005), patient comorbidity (p = 0.006), obesity (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001). The strongest predictors of wound complications were class II obesity (OR = 2.12), class III obesity (OR = 3.09), and smoking (OR = 1.70). Risk factors for medical morbidity included: immediate autologous (p < 0.001), recent chemotherapy (p = 0.013), ASA physical status (p < 0.001), bilateral procedure (p = 0.002), patient comorbidity (p < 0.001), and obesity (p < 0.001). The strongest predictors of medical morbidity were immediate autologous reconstruction (OR = 3.54) and comorbidity burden of ≥2 comorbid conditions (OR = 2.28). In conclusion, undergoing IBR is associated with a modality-specific increased risk of morbidity relative to mastectomy alone. However, other modifiable risk factors appear to be strongly correlated with postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: prognostic/risk category, level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS-NSQIP; Breast reconstruction; implants; mastectomy; outcomes; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24328902     DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.865633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg        ISSN: 2000-6764


  16 in total

1.  Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction Using Private Insurer Claims Data.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Kelly E Ball; Daniel Mines; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect morbidity, mortality, reoperations, or readmissions in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy for breast cancer?

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Barbara Bennie; Mallory S Bray; Choua A Vang; Jared H Linebarger
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

3.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Postoperative Complications and Mortality After Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhang; Aisheng Hou; Jiangbei Cao; Yanhong Liu; Jingsheng Lou; Hao Li; Yulong Ma; Yuxiang Song; Weidong Mi; Jing Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

6.  Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Alfred P Yoon; Ji Qi; David L Brown; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 7.  The Impact of Obesity on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel F Argolo; Clifford A Hudis; Neil M Iyengar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Authors:  Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy; Benjamin B Massenburg; John M Rozehnal; Nachi Gupta; Jonatan Hernandez Rosa; Michael J Ingargiola; Peter J Taub
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 10.  Obesity and Energy Balance Considerations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Berger; Neil M Iyengar
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.