Literature DB >> 24322683

Advances in public health accreditation readiness and quality improvement: evaluation findings from the National Public Health Improvement Initiative.

Anita W McLees1, Craig W Thomas, Saira Nawaz, Andrea C Young, Nikki Rider, Mary Davis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continuous quality improvement is a central tenet of the Public Health Accreditation Board's (PHAB) national voluntary public health accreditation program. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the National Public Health Improvement Initiative (NPHII) in 2010 with the goal of advancing accreditation readiness, performance management, and quality improvement (QI).
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the extent to which NPHII awardees have achieved program goals.
DESIGN: NPHII awardees responded to an annual assessment and program monitoring data requests. Analysis included simple descriptive statistics.
SETTING: Seventy-four state, tribal, local, and territorial public health agencies receiving NPHII funds. PARTICIPANTS: NPHII performance improvement managers or principal investigators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of accreditation prerequisites, completion of an organizational self-assessment against the PHAB Standards and Measures, Version 1.0, establishment of a performance management system, and implementation of QI initiatives to increase efficiency and effectiveness.
RESULTS: Of the 73 responding NPHII awardees, 42.5% had a current health assessment, 26% had a current health improvement plan, and 48% had a current strategic plan in place at the end of the second program year. Approximately 26% of awardees had completed an organizational PHAB self-assessment, 72% had established at least 1 of the 4 components of a performance management system, and 90% had conducted QI activities focused on increasing efficiencies and/or effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: NPHII appears to be supporting awardees' initial achievement of program outcomes. As NPHII enters its third year, there will be additional opportunities to advance the work of NPHII, compile and disseminate results, and inform a vision of high-quality public health necessary to improve the health of the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24322683      PMCID: PMC4699179          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31829ff726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  8 in total

1.  Profiles in courage: evolution of Florida's quality improvement and performance measurement system.

Authors:  L M Beitsch; C M Grigg; K Mason; R G Brooks
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2000-09

2.  Workforce development at the local level: the NACCHO perspective.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  Assessing quality improvement in local health departments: results from the Multi-State Learning Collaborative.

Authors:  Brenda M Joly; Maureen Booth; George Shaler; Prashant Mittal
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Quality improvement interventions in public health systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia A Dilley; Betty Bekemeier; Jeffrey R Harris
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The role of performance management and quality improvement in a national voluntary public health accreditation system.

Authors:  Stacy L Baker; Leslie Beitsch; Laura B Landrum; Rebecca Head
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

6.  The national public health performance standards: driving quality improvement in public health systems.

Authors:  Liza C Corso; Dennis Lenaway; Leslie M Beitsch; Laura B Landrum; Heidi Deutsch
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

7.  Quality improvement in public health: where are we now?

Authors:  William J Riley; Leslie M Beitsch; Helen M Parsons; John W Moran
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

8.  Informing the national public health accreditation movement: lessons from North Carolina's accredited local health departments.

Authors:  Mary V Davis; Margaret M Cannon; David O Stone; Brittan W Wood; Joy Reed; Edward L Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Local Public Health Department Characteristics Associated With Likelihood to Participate in National Accreditation.

Authors:  Valerie A Yeager; Alva O Ferdinand; Leslie M Beitsch; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public health accreditation: rubber stamp or roadmap for improvement.

Authors:  Angela L Carman; Lava Timsina
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: a framework for public health.

Authors:  Anita W McLees; Saira Nawaz; Craig Thomas; Andrea Young
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Patterns and predictors of local health department accreditation in Missouri.

Authors:  Kate E Beatty; Jeffrey Mayer; Michael Elliott; Ross C Brownson; Kathleen Wojciehowski
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

5.  The Data-to-Action Framework: A Rapid Program Improvement Process.

Authors:  Ronda Zakocs; Jessica A Hill; Pamela Brown; Jocelyn Wheaton; Kimberley E Freire
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2015-08

6.  Assessing Continuous Quality Improvement in Public Health: Adapting Lessons from Healthcare.

Authors:  Alex Price; Robert Schwartz; Joanna Cohen; Heather Manson; Fran Scott
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2017-02

7.  The Relationship Between Health Department Accreditation and Workforce Satisfaction, Retention, and Training Needs.

Authors:  Valerie A Yeager; Casey P Balio; Jessica Kronstadt; Leslie M Beitsch
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.