Literature DB >> 25689185

Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: a framework for public health.

Anita W McLees1, Saira Nawaz, Craig Thomas, Andrea Young.   

Abstract

We describe an evidence-based framework to define and assess the impact of quality improvement (QI) in public health. Developed to address programmatic and research-identified needs for articulating the value of public health QI in aggregate, this framework proposes a standardized set of measures to monitor and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public health programs and operations. We reviewed the scientific literature and analyzed QI initiatives implemented through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Public Health Improvement Initiative to inform the selection of 5 efficiency and 8 effectiveness measures. This framework provides a model for identifying the types of improvement outcomes targeted by public health QI efforts and a means to understand QI's impact on the practice of public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25689185      PMCID: PMC4355721          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  39 in total

1.  Conceptual and methodological issues in public health performance measurement: results from a computer-assisted expert panel process.

Authors:  G P Mays; P K Halverson
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2000-09

2.  Profiles in courage: evolution of Florida's quality improvement and performance measurement system.

Authors:  L M Beitsch; C M Grigg; K Mason; R G Brooks
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Public health quality measurement: concepts and challenges.

Authors:  Stephen F Derose; Mark A Schuster; Jonathan E Fielding; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Quality improvement in public health: moving from knowing the path to walking the path.

Authors:  Greg D Randolph; C Suzanne Lea
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

5.  Applying the model for improvement in a local health department: quality improvement as an effective approach in navigating the changing landscape of public health practice in Buncombe County, North Carolina.

Authors:  Lisa Macon Harrison; Edward D Shook; Gibbie Harris; C Suzanne Lea; Amanda Cornett; Greg D Randolph
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

6.  Quality improvement and accreditation readiness in state public health agencies.

Authors:  Kusuma Madamala; Katie Sellers; Leslie M Beitsch; Jim Pearsol; Paul Jarris
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

7.  Quality improvement learning collaboratives in public health: findings from a multisite case study.

Authors:  Brenda M Joly; Maureen Booth; George Shaler; Ann Conway
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

8.  Creating a framework for getting quality into the public health system.

Authors:  Peggy A Honoré; Donald Wright; Donald M Berwick; Carolyn M Clancy; Peter Lee; Juleigh Nowinski; Howard K Koh
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Early evaluation results from a statewide quality improvement training program for local public health departments in North Carolina.

Authors:  Amanda Cornett; Monecia Thomas; Mary V Davis; Elizabeth Mahanna; Andrea Cordova; Claire Herring; C Suzanne Lea; Lisa Macon Harrison; Greg D Randolph
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

10.  Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches: application, application, application.

Authors:  Mary V Davis; Amy Vincus; Matthew Eggers; Elizabeth Mahanna; William Riley; Brenda Joly; Jessica Solomon Fisher; Michael J Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb
View more
  4 in total

1.  The Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network (CoIIN) to Reduce Infant Mortality: An Outcome Evaluation From the US South, 2011 to 2014.

Authors:  Ashley H Hirai; William M Sappenfield; Reem M Ghandour; Sara Donahue; Vanessa Lee; Michael C Lu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Framing Bias in the Interpretation of Quality Improvement Data: Evidence From an Experiment.

Authors:  Andrew Ballard
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-05-01

3.  Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.

Authors:  S'thembile Thusini; Maria Milenova; Noushig Nahabedian; Barbara Grey; Tayana Soukup; Claire Henderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Public Health Quality Improvement Exchange: A Tool to Support Advancements in Public Health Practice.

Authors:  Stephen L Brown; Barbara L Massoudi; Jamie M Pina; Kusuma Madamala
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2018-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.