| Literature DB >> 24321375 |
Julie McLellan1, Anita Laidlaw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether personality and/or psychological functioning affect mothers' perceptions of postnatal communication and their level of satisfaction with their postnatal care. Mothers' perceptions of the communication with health professionals prenatally and during birth may be affected by their personality traits and psychological functioning and are linked to the level of satisfaction they have in their healthcare. Little is known about factors that are associated with perceptions of communication within postnatal care and the impact this may have on satisfaction with care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24321375 PMCID: PMC4029156 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Descriptive characteristics of the demographic and additional factors of the sample
| | | | |
Figure 1Mean total satisfaction with postnatal care and communication ratings for breastfeeding mothers and those who were not breastfeeding. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 2Mean total satisfaction with postnatal care and communication ratings grouped by depression sub-types. Error bars represent standard errors.
Correlations between personality traits and communication and satisfaction ratings and correlations between communication measures and total satisfaction
| .277** | .259* | .245* | .339** | ||
| .010 | .015 | .039 | .004 | ||
| 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | ||
| .303** | .331** | .328** | .305** | ||
| .005 | .002 | .005 | .010 | ||
| 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | ||
| .306** | .226* | .363** | .386** | ||
| .005 | .029 | .002 | .001 | ||
| 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | ||
| .716** | .672** | .761** | |||
| .000 | .000 | .000 | |||
| 71 | 71 | 71 |
*Sig at P = 0.05 level, **Sig at P = 0.01 level.
4-step hierarchical multiple linear regression
| Constant | -7.375 | 3.459 | | -7.729 | 4.009 | | -10.202 | 4.383 | | -20.953 | 8.664 | |
| Overall communication | .232 | .053 | .233 | .054 | .242 | .054 | .230 | .054 | ||||
| Midwife communication | .621 | .176 | .618 | .178 | .578 | .179 | .527 | .184 | ||||
| Health visitor communication | .524 | .157 | .535 | .170 | .488 | .172 | .480 | .176 | ||||
| HADS depression sub-group | | | | .376 | 2.102 | .013 | -.103 | 2.119 | -.004 | .242 | 2.144 | .008 |
| Feeding method | | | | | | | 3.264 | 2.411 | .094 | 3.636 | 2.495 | .105 |
| Agreeableness | | | | | | | | | | 1.109 | 1.004 | .080 |
| Emotional stability | | | | | | | | | | -.195 | .848 | -.017 |
| Conscientiousness | 1.029 | .944 | .083 | |||||||||
Note: R² = .72 for Step 1, adjusted R²= 0 for Step 2 (p > .05), adjusted R²= .008 for Step 3 ((p > .05), adjusted R²= .014 for Step 3 (p > .05) *p < .001, **p < .005, ***p < .01.
Figure 3Diagram illustrating the key relationships from the study.