Literature DB >> 12581034

Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial.

Mary Anne Biró1, Ulla Waldenström, Stephanie Brown, Jan H Pannifex.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1996 a new model of maternity care characterized by continuity of midwifery care from early pregnancy through the postpartum period was implemented for women attending Monash Medical Centre, a tertiary level obstetric service, in Melbourne, Australia. This study's purpose was to assess the impact of this model on women's views and experiences of care during the antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum periods compared with views of women receiving standard maternity care.
METHODS: One thousand low- and high-risk women who booked at the antenatal clinic and met the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to continuity of midwifery care from a group of seven midwives in collaboration with medical staff, or to standard care from a variety of midwives and medical staff. Women's views of care were measured by means of a postal questionnaire at four months after the birth.
RESULTS: Team midwifery care was associated with increased satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and some aspects of postpartum care. The differences were most obvious for antenatal care.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of midwifery care is realistically achievable in a tertiary obstetric referral service and is associated with increased satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12581034     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  20 in total

1.  Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Y Tony Yang; Melissa D Avery; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  Social inequalities in the organization of pregnancy care in a universally funded public health care system.

Authors:  Georgina Sutherland; Jane Yelland; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

3.  A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Jessica Tone; Sutapa Talukdar; Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Childhood maltreatment history, posttraumatic relational sequelae, and prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Sue Anne Bell; Julia Seng
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013-06-17

Review 5.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Are women attending a midwifery-led birthing center at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  Bobby D O'Leary; Vineta Ciprike
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Continuity of midwifery care and gestational weight gain in obese women: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cate Nagle; Helen Skouteris; Anne Hotchin; Lauren Bruce; Denise Patterson; Glyn Teale
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Joint action between child health care nurses and midwives leads to continuity of care for expectant and new mothers.

Authors:  Mia Barimani; Ingrid Hylander
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 9.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

10.  Partners' expectations and experiences of the project 'Midwife All the Way': A qualitative study.

Authors:  Birgitta Larsson; Li Thies-Lagergren
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.