Literature DB >> 24320411

A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.

Jason Pukala1, Sanford L Meeks, Robert J Staton, Frank J Bova, Rafael R Mañon, Katja M Langen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deformable image registration (DIR) is being used increasingly in various clinical applications. However, the underlying uncertainties of DIR are not well-understood and a comprehensive methodology has not been developed for assessing a range of interfraction anatomic changes during head and neck cancer radiotherapy. This study describes the development of a library of clinically relevant virtual phantoms for the purpose of aiding clinicians in the QA of DIR software. These phantoms will also be available to the community for the independent study and comparison of other DIR algorithms and processes.
METHODS: Each phantom was derived from a pair of kVCT volumetric image sets. The first images were acquired of head and neck cancer patients prior to the start-of-treatment and the second were acquired near the end-of-treatment. A research algorithm was used to autosegment and deform the start-of-treatment (SOT) images according to a biomechanical model. This algorithm allowed the user to adjust the head position, mandible position, and weight loss in the neck region of the SOT images to resemble the end-of-treatment (EOT) images. A human-guided thin-plate splines algorithm was then used to iteratively apply further deformations to the images with the objective of matching the EOT anatomy as closely as possible. The deformations from each algorithm were combined into a single deformation vector field (DVF) and a simulated end-of-treatment (SEOT) image dataset was generated from that DVF. Artificial noise was added to the SEOT images and these images, along with the original SOT images, created a virtual phantom where the underlying "ground-truth" DVF is known. Images from ten patients were deformed in this fashion to create ten clinically relevant virtual phantoms. The virtual phantoms were evaluated to identify unrealistic DVFs using the normalized cross correlation (NCC) and the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. A commercial deformation algorithm was applied to the virtual phantoms to show how they may be used to generate estimates of DIR uncertainty.
RESULTS: The NCC showed that the simulated phantom images had greater similarity to the actual EOT images than the images from which they were derived, supporting the clinical relevance of the synthetic deformation maps. Calculation of the Jacobian of the "ground-truth" DVFs resulted in only positive values. As an example, mean error statistics are presented for all phantoms for the brainstem, cord, mandible, left parotid, and right parotid.
CONCLUSIONS: It is essential that DIR algorithms be evaluated using a range of possible clinical scenarios for each treatment site. This work introduces a library of virtual phantoms intended to resemble real cases for interfraction head and neck DIR that may be used to estimate and compare the uncertainty of any DIR algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320411     DOI: 10.1118/1.4823467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Quality assurance assessment of diagnostic and radiation therapy-simulation CT image registration for head and neck radiation therapy: anatomic region of interest-based comparison of rigid and deformable algorithms.

Authors:  Abdallah S R Mohamed; Manee-Naad Ruangskul; Musaddiq J Awan; Charles A Baron; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Thomas M Guerrero; Esengul Kocak-Uzel; Jinzhong Yang; Laurence E Court; Michael E Kantor; G Brandon Gunn; Rivka R Colen; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Evaluation of deformable image registration methods for dose monitoring in head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bastien Rigaud; Antoine Simon; Joël Castelli; Maxime Gobeli; Juan-David Ospina Arango; Guillaume Cazoulat; Olivier Henry; Pascal Haigron; Renaud De Crevoisier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration-Based Contour Propagation From Planning CT to Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Andrew J Woerner; Mehee Choi; Matthew M Harkenrider; John C Roeske; Murat Surucu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-03-10

4.  Evaluation of the tool "Reg Refine" for user-guided deformable image registration.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Kyle R Padgett; Kuan L Chen; Nesrin Dogan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Benchmarking of five commercial deformable image registration algorithms for head and neck patients.

Authors:  Jason Pukala; Perry B Johnson; Amish P Shah; Katja M Langen; Frank J Bova; Robert J Staton; Rafael R Mañon; Patrick Kelly; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Practical quantification of image registration accuracy following the AAPM TG-132 report framework.

Authors:  Kujtim Latifi; Jimmy Caudell; Geoffrey Zhang; Dylan Hunt; Eduardo G Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.

Authors:  An Qin; Dan Ionascu; Jian Liang; Xiao Han; Nicolette O'Connell; Di Yan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Percy Lee; Adam D Yock; Jeffrey R Olsen; Minsong Cao; Farzan Siddiqui; William Parker; Anthony Doemer; Yi Rong; Amar U Kishan; Stanley H Benedict; X Allen Li; Beth A Erickson; Jason W Sohn; Ying Xiao; Evan Wuthrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Validation of a deformable MRI to CT registration algorithm employing same day planning MRI for surrogate analysis.

Authors:  Kyle R Padgett; Radka Stoyanova; Sara Pirozzi; Perry Johnson; Jon Piper; Nesrin Dogan; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy - how should we evaluate and interpret the result?

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jean Pouliot; Eric Smith; Cynthia Chuang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.