Literature DB >> 21666098

Proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: meta-analyses by recruitment channel and methodological quality.

Flora Tzelepis1, Christine L Paul, Raoul A Walsh, Patrick McElduff, Jenny Knight.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews demonstrated that proactive telephone counseling increases smoking cessation rates. However, these reviews did not differentiate studies by recruitment channel, did not adequately assess methodological quality, and combined different measures of abstinence.
METHODS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials published before December 31, 2008, included seven of active recruitment, 16 of passive recruitment, and one of mixed recruitment. We rated methodological quality on selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, withdrawals, and dropouts, according to the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. We conducted random effects meta-analysis to pool the results according to abstinence type and follow-up time for studies overall and segregated by recruitment channel, and methodological quality. The level of statistical heterogeneity was quantified by I(2). All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Methodological quality ratings indicated two strong, 10 moderate, and 12 weak studies. Overall, compared with self-help materials or no intervention control groups, proactive telephone counseling had a statistically significantly greater effect on point prevalence abstinence (nonsmoking at follow-up or abstinent for at least 24 hours, 7 days before follow-up) at 6-9 months (relative risk [RR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.43, P < .001, I(2) = 21.4%) but not at 12-15 months after recruitment. This pattern also emerged when studies were segregated by recruitment channel (active, passive) or methodological quality (strong/moderate, weak). Overall, the positive effect on prolonged/continuous abstinence (abstinent for 3 months or longer before follow-up) was also statistically significantly greater at 6-9 months (RR = 1.58, CI = 1.26 to 1.98, P < .001, I(2) = 49.1%) and 12-18 months after recruitment (RR = 1.40, CI = 1.23 to 1.60, P < .001, I(2) = 18.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of point prevalence abstinence in the long term, these data support previous results showing that proactive telephone counseling has a positive impact on smoking cessation. Proactive telephone counseling increased prolonged/continuous abstinence long term for both actively and passively recruited smokers.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21666098     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  25 in total

1.  Impact of a brief telephone referral on quitline use, quit attempts and abstinence.

Authors:  Amanda R Mathew; Jessica L Burris; Anthony J Alberg; K Michael Cummings; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-08-04

2.  Preliminary evaluation of a telephone-based smoking cessation intervention in the lung cancer screening setting: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Charlotte J Hagerman; George Luta; Paula G Bellini; Cassandra Stanton; David B Abrams; Jenna A Kramer; Eric Anderson; Shawn Regis; Andrea McKee; Brady McKee; Ray Niaura; Harry Harper; Michael Ramsaier
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Study protocol for a telephone-based smoking cessation randomized controlled trial in the lung cancer screening setting: The lung screening, tobacco, and health trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Danielle E Deros; Shelby Fallon; Jennifer Stephens; Emily Kim; Tania Lobo; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Jinani Jayasekera; Rafael Meza; Cassandra A Stanton; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Brady McKee; Judith Howell; Michael Ramsaier; Juan Batlle; Ellen Dornelas; Vicky Parikh; Eric Anderson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics Program in the Trinity Health System.

Authors:  Sonia A Duffy; David L Ronis; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Lee A Ewing; Stephanie V Hall; James J Yang; Patricia L Thomas; Christine M Olree; Kimberly A Maguire; Lisa Friedman; Donna Gray; Neil Jordan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior?

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Adaptation of a Proactive Smoking Cessation Intervention to Increase Tobacco Quitline Use by LGBT Smokers.

Authors:  Alicia K Matthews; Elizabeth Breen; Anna Veluz-Wilkins; Christina Ciecierski; Melissa Simon; Diane Burrell; Brian Hitsman
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention Versus Clinic-Based Specialty Care for Veterans.

Authors:  Patrick S Calhoun; Santanu Datta; Maren Olsen; Valerie A Smith; Scott D Moore; Lauren P Hair; Eric A Dedert; Angela Kirby; Michelle Dennis; Jean C Beckham; Lori A Bastian
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2016-06-17

8.  Ask-Advise-Connect: a new approach to smoking treatment delivery in health care settings.

Authors:  Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Sanjay Shete; Yumei Cao; Anthony Greisinger; Penny Harmonson; Barry Sharp; Lyndsay Miles; Susan M Zbikowski; David W Wetter
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Employing a Multi-level Approach to Recruit a Representative Sample of Women with Recent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus into a Randomized Lifestyle Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Jacinda M Nicklas; Geraldine Skurnik; Chloe A Zera; Liberty G Reforma; Sue E Levkoff; Ellen W Seely
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

10.  Intervention With Brief Cessation Advice Plus Active Referral for Proactively Recruited Community Smokers: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Man Ping Wang; Yi Nam Suen; William Ho-Cheung Li; Christina Oi-Bun Lam; Socrates Yong-da Wu; Antonio Cho-Shing Kwong; Vienna W Lai; Sophia S Chan; Tai Hing Lam
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.