Literature DB >> 24317957

Static biofilm removal around ultrasonic tips in vitro.

Thomas Thurnheer1, Elodie Rohrer, Georgios N Belibasakis, Thomas Attin, Patrick R Schmidlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the biofilm removal capacity of two ultrasonic tips under standardized conditions using a multi-species biofilm model.
METHODS: Six-species biofilms were grown on hydroxyapatite discs for 64.5 h and were treated for 15 s with a standardized load of 40 g with a piezoelectric or magnetostrictive device. Tips were applied either with the tip end or with the side facing downwards. Detached bacteria were determined in the supernatant and colony-forming units (CFUs) counted after 72 h of incubation. Untreated specimens served as controls. Moreover, the biofilms remaining on the hydroxyapatite surface after treatment were stained using the Live/Dead stain, and the pattern of their detachment was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).
RESULTS: As compared to the untreated control, it was found that only a side application of the magnetostrictive device was able to remove efficiently the biofilm. In contrast, its tip application as well as both applications of the piezoelectric device removed significantly less bacteria from the biofilm structure. These findings were corroborated by CLSM observation.
CONCLUSION: Both ultrasonic tips under investigations led to bacterial detachment, but the action mode as well as the tip configuration and adaptation appeared to be influenced by the biofilm removal effectiveness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Biofilm removal remains a main goal of ultrasonic debridement. This should be reflected in respective laboratory investigations. The presented combination of methods applied on a multi-species biofilm model in vitro allows the evaluation of the effectiveness of different ultrasonic scaler applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24317957     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1157-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  24 in total

1.  Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque.

Authors:  B Guggenheim; E Giertsen; P Schüpbach; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Non-contact removal of coadhering and non-coadhering bacterial pairs from pellicle surfaces by sonic brushing and de novo adhesion.

Authors:  H J Busscher; M Rustema-Abbing; G M Bruinsma; M de Jager; B Gottenbos; H C van der Mei
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.612

3.  Mapping cavitation activity around dental ultrasonic tips.

Authors:  A Damien Walmsley; Simon C Lea; Bernhard Felver; David C King; Gareth J Price
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Inherent variability of the performance of the ultrasonic descaler.

Authors:  A D Walmsley; W R Laird; A R Williams
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Streptococcus mutans gtfC deficiency on mixed oral biofilms in vitro.

Authors:  T Thurnheer; J R van der Ploeg; E Giertsen; B Guggenheim
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  A model system to demonstrate the role of cavitational activity in ultrasonic scaling.

Authors:  A D Walmsley; W R Laird; A R Williams
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. I. Moderately advanced periodontitis.

Authors:  A Badersten; R Nilvéus; J Egelberg
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Biofilm reduction and staining potential of a 0.05% chlorhexidine rinse containing essential oils.

Authors:  D Hofer; A Meier; B Sener; B Guggenheim; T Attin; P R Schmidlin
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.477

9.  Antigenic heterogeneity of Bacteroides intermedius as recognized by monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  R Gmür; B Guggenheim
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations.

Authors:  Simon C Lea; Bernhard Felver; Gabriel Landini; A Damien Walmsley
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 8.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Oral infections: clinical and biological perspectives.

Authors:  Georgios N Belibasakis; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.882

2.  Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal.

Authors:  Stefanie J Gartenmann; Thomas Thurnheer; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Integration of non-oral bacteria into in vitro oral biofilms.

Authors:  Thomas Thurnheer; Georgios N Belibasakis
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.882

4.  A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Tobias T Hägi; Sabrina Klemensberger; Riccarda Bereiter; Sandor Nietzsche; Raluca Cosgarea; Simon Flury; Adrian Lussi; Anton Sculean; Sigrun Eick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fusobacterium Species and Subspecies Differentially Affect the Composition and Architecture of Supra- and Subgingival Biofilms Models.

Authors:  Thomas Thurnheer; Lamprini Karygianni; Manuela Flury; Georgios N Belibasakis
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  What is the best technic to dislodge Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm on medical implants?

Authors:  Vivien Moris; Mylan Lam; Lucie Amoureux; Arnaud Magallon; Adrien Guilloteau; Thomas Maldiney; Narcisse Zwetyenga; Céline Falentin-Daudre; Catherine Neuwirth
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.465

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.