Literature DB >> 14632680

Non-contact removal of coadhering and non-coadhering bacterial pairs from pellicle surfaces by sonic brushing and de novo adhesion.

H J Busscher1, M Rustema-Abbing, G M Bruinsma, M de Jager, B Gottenbos, H C van der Mei.   

Abstract

Coadhesion between oral microbial pairs is an established factor in the spatiotemporal development and prevalence of mixed-species communities in early dental plaque in vivo. This study compares removal and de novo adhesion of pairs of coadhering and non-coadhering oral actinomyces and streptococci by sonic brushing on salivary pellicles in a non-contact mode as a function of the distance between the brush and the pellicle surface in vitro. First, actinomycetes were adhered to a pellicle surface, after which streptococci suspended in saliva were allowed to adhere. Removal was examined by non-contact, sonic brushing with a wetted brush on a either a wetted or a substratum immersed to a depth of 7 mm. After brushing, de novo adhesion of streptococci to brushed pellicles was studied. For coadhering and non-coadhering pairs, 34% and 9%, respectively, of the adhering bacteria were involved in aggregates comprising more than 10 organisms. Non-contact, sonic brushing removed up to 99% of the adhering bacteria, regardless of the state of immersion of the substratum. Bacterial removal decreased with increasing distance of up to 6 mm between brush and pellicle surface. For the non-coadhering pair, subsequent exposure of pellicles to a streptococcal suspension yielded about 6% of bacteria involved in large aggregates. Alternatively, de novo adhesion of the coadhering streptococcal strain to pellicles brushed on the wetted substratum yielded 31% of bacteria involved in large aggregates, but after brushing the immersed substratum only 12% of the adhering bacteria were found in large aggregates. It is concluded that non-contact sonic brushing, under immersion, removes high percentage of adhering bacterial pairs up to a distance of 6 mm between the brush and the pellicle surface. However, non-contact, sonic brushing with only a thin wet film on the substratum may leave footprints to which streptococci preferentially adhere.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14632680     DOI: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  8 in total

1.  Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal.

Authors:  Martinus J Verkaik; Henk J Busscher; Minie Rustema-Abbing; Anje M Slomp; Frank Abbas; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Efficacy of various side-to-side toothbrushes and impact of brushing parameters on noncontact biofilm removal in an interdental space model.

Authors:  Julia C Schmidt; Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer; Tuomas Waltimo; Roland Weiger; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Brushing without brushing?--a review of the efficacy of powered toothbrushes in noncontact biofilm removal.

Authors:  Julia C Schmidt; Christian Zaugg; Roland Weiger; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Static biofilm removal around ultrasonic tips in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas Thurnheer; Elodie Rohrer; Georgios N Belibasakis; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effects of easy-to-perform procedures to reduce bacterial colonization with Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus on toothbrushes.

Authors:  Andreas Erich Zautner; Annina Hage; Katja Schneider; Karolin Schlösser; Ortrud Zimmermann; Else Hornecker; Rainer F Mausberg; Hagen Frickmann; Uwe Groß; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2013-09-23

6.  The influence of time and irrigant refreshment on biofilm removal from lateral morphological features of simulated root canals.

Authors:  T C Pereira; R J B Dijkstra; X Petridis; W J van der Meer; P K Sharma; F B de Andrade; L W M van der Sluis
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.264

7.  The response of dual-species bacterial biofilm to 2% and 5% NaOCl mixed with etidronic acid: A laboratory real-time evaluation using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mariana Maciel Batista Borges; René J B Dijkstra; Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Michel Versluis; Lucas W M van der Sluis; Xenos Petridis
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Biofilm removal from a simulated isthmus and lateral canal during syringe irrigation at various flow rates: a combined experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics approach.

Authors:  T C Pereira; C Boutsioukis; R J B Dijkstra; X Petridis; M Versluis; F B de Andrade; W J van de Meer; P K Sharma; L W M van der Sluis; M V R So
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.264

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.