Literature DB >> 24317838

Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural-verbal description.

Joanna L Brooks1, Maria A Brandimonte.   

Abstract

The current research explored pseudoneglect for the mental representation of real-world scenes generated from aural-verbal description in the complete absence of direct visual processing. Healthy participants listened binaurally or monaurally to aural-verbal descriptions of novel real-world scenes with familiar landmarks (e.g., 'shop', 'cafe', 'school') to be imagined on the left- or right-hand side. Participants were asked to mentally represent the street scene using a visuospatial template though it was up to participants how they mentally represented each individual landmark within the street (i.e., in terms of colour and size). There were two main tasks: a relative judgement task (which side of the street contains the most landmarks?) and a recall task (recall the landmarks on the left vs. right side of the street). When stimuli were presented monaurally to the left ear (favouring the activation of the right hemisphere) participants demonstrated representational pseudoneglect and showed a bias towards responding that there were more landmarks on the left compared to the right. However, this did not lead to enhanced recall for left side landmarks. When stimuli were presented binaurally or monaurally to the right ear, there was no evidence of representational pseudoneglect for the relative judgement or recall task. The current study discusses how the use of monaural presentation may boost right hemisphere activation in aural-verbal experimental paradigms designed to explore representational pseudoneglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24317838     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-013-0591-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  28 in total

1.  Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI.

Authors:  G R Fink; J C Marshall; N J Shah; P H Weiss; P W Halligan; M Grosse-Ruyken; K Ziemons; K Zilles; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Representational pseudoneglect and reference points both influence geographic location estimates.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Christine Mohr; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Alissandra M McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

4.  Unilateral neglect of representational space.

Authors:  E Bisiach; C Luzzatti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  A lateralized bias in mental imagery: evidence for representational pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Peter McGeorge; Nicoletta Beschin; Alessandra Colnaghi; Maria Luisa Rusconi; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Functional reorganization of the human auditory pathways following hemispherectomy: an fMRI demonstration.

Authors:  P Paiement; F Champoux; B A Bacon; M Lassonde; J-P Gagné; B Mensour; J-M Leroux; F Lepore
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation.

Authors:  K M Heilman; T Van Den Abell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.

Authors:  D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.

Authors:  Monica-Narcisa Toba; Patrick Cavanagh; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Asymmetrical representation of body orientation.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Heather L Jenkin; Richard T Dyde; Michael R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Fear-specific leftward bias in gaze direction judgment.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Qiqi Hu; Xinwei Lai; Zhonghua Hu; Shan Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.