Literature DB >> 23378132

Asymmetrical representation of body orientation.

Michael Barnett-Cowan1, Heather L Jenkin, Richard T Dyde, Michael R Jenkin, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

The perceived orientation of objects, gravity, and the body are biased to the left. Whether this leftward bias is attributable to biases in sensing or processing vestibular, visual, and body sense cues has never been assessed directly. The orientation in which characters are most easily recognized--the perceived upright (PU)--can be well predicted from a weighted vector sum of these sensory cues. A simple form of this model assumes that the directions of the contributing inputs are coded accurately and as a consequence participants tilted left- or right-side-down relative to gravity should exhibit mirror symmetric patterns of responses. If a left/right asymmetry were present then varying these sensory cues could be used to assess in which sensory modality or modalities a PU bias may have arisen. Participants completed the Oriented Character Recognition Test (OCHART) while manipulating body posture and visual orientation cues relative to gravity. The response patterns showed systematic differences depending on which side they were tilted. An asymmetry of the PU was found to be best modeled by adding a leftward bias of 5.6° to the perceived orientation of the body relative to its actual orientation relative to the head. The asymmetry in the effect of body orientation is reminiscent of the body-defined left-leaning asymmetry in the perceived direction of light coming from above and reports that people tend to adopt a right-leaning posture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23378132     DOI: 10.1167/13.2.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?

Authors:  A Drakul; C J Bockisch; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural-verbal description.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Maria A Brandimonte
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-12-08

3.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  The effect of long-term exposure to microgravity on the perception of upright.

Authors:  Laurence R Harris; Michael Jenkin; Heather Jenkin; James E Zacher; Richard T Dyde
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Gravity-dependent change in the 'light-from-above' prior.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality.

Authors:  Ksander N De Winkel; Ellen Edel; Riender Happee; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Long-duration head down bed rest as an analog of microgravity: Effects on the static perception of upright.

Authors:  Laurence R Harris; Michael Jenkin; Rainer Herpers
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.354

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.