Literature DB >> 24315967

Outcomes of patients requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention for catastrophic complications during transvenous lead extraction.

Michael P Brunner1, Edmond M Cronin1, Oussama Wazni1, Bryan Baranowski1, Walid I Saliba1, Joseph F Sabik2, Bruce D Lindsay1, Bruce L Wilkoff1, Khaldoun G Tarakji3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of patients requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) have not been well characterized.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of catastrophic complications requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention during TLE, to describe the injuries, and to review patient management and outcomes.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing TLE of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads at the Cleveland Clinic between August 1996 and September 2012 were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 5973 (4436 [74.3%] pacemaker and 1537 [25.7%] ICD) leads were extracted during 3258 TLE procedures (median [25th, 75th percentile] patient age 67.0 [55.0, 76.1] years; 69.2% men). The median (25th, 75th percentile) lead implant duration was 4.9 (2.4, 8.4) years, and 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) leads were extracted per procedure. Powered sheaths were used in 2369 (72.7%) procedures. Twenty-five (0.8%) patients experienced catastrophic complications requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention. Twenty patients (0.6%) required either sternotomy (n = 18) or thoracotomy (n = 2) for superior vena cava laceration (n = 15) and right atrial (n = 2) or ventricular (n = 3) perforation. Two patients required vascular repair at the procedural access site for either subclavian vein or artery laceration. Three patients were managed with an endovascular approach for superior vena cava laceration, left axillary artery laceration, and brachiocephalic vein and artery fistula. In-hospital mortality was 36.0% (6 procedural/operative deaths and 3 deaths during the same hospitalization).
CONCLUSIONS: Major vascular injury or cardiac perforation requiring emergent surgical or endovascular intervention during TLE is uncommon but carries significant in-hospital mortality. Despite high mortality, nearly two-thirds of these patients were rescued with immediate response and surgical or endovascular intervention.
Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Emergent surgical intervention; Extraction; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Lead; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315967     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  28 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adryan A Perez; Frank W Woo; Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Christopher R Ellis; Pascal Defaye; Charles Kennergren
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

4.  Outcomes 1 Year After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Abandonment Versus Explantation for Unused or Malfunctioning Leads: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Emily P Zeitler; Yongfei Wang; Kumar Dharmarajan; Kevin J Anstrom; Eric D Peterson; James P Daubert; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07

5.  Management of Cardiac Electronic Device Infections: Challenges and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt; Jens Brock Johansen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016

6.  Positive chronotropic effect caused by transthoracic ultrasound in heart of rats.

Authors:  Olivia C Coiado; Rahul S Yerrabelli; Anton P Christensen; Marcin Wozniak; Alex Lucas; William D O'Brien
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-08-03

Review 7.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

8.  Effectiveness and Safety of Transvenous Removal of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Leads in the Real Clinical Scenario.

Authors:  Roberto Costa; Katia Regina da Silva; Elizabeth Sartori Crevelari; Wagner Tadeu Jurevicius Nascimento; Marcia Mitie Nagumo; Martino Martinelli Filho; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 9.  Lead extraction using a laser system: Techniques, efficacy, and limitations.

Authors:  Hideo Okamura
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-08-18

10.  A case of symmetrical peripheral gangrene associated with transvenous lead extraction.

Authors:  Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.