Literature DB >> 24313630

Automatic scoring of sleep stages and cortical arousals using two electrodes on the forehead: validation in healthy adults.

Djordje Popovic1, Michael Khoo, Philip Westbrook.   

Abstract

Accuracy and limitations of automatic scoring of sleep stages and electroencephalogram arousals from a single derivation (Fp1 -Fp2 ) were studied in 29 healthy adults using a portable wireless polysomnographic recorder. All recordings were scored five times: twice by a referent scorer who viewed the standard polysomnographic montage and observed the American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules (referent scoring and blind rescoring); and once by the same scorer who viewed only the Fp1 -Fp2 signal (alternative scoring), by another expert from the same institution, and by the algorithm. Automatic, alternative and independent expert scoring were compared with the referent scoring on an epoch-by-epoch basis. The algorithm's agreement with the reference (81.0%, Cohen's κ = 0.75) was comparable to the inter-rater agreement (83.3%, Cohen's κ = 0.78) or agreement between the referent scoring and manual scoring of the frontopolar derivation (80.7%, Cohen's κ = 0.75). Most misclassifications by the algorithm occurred during uneventful wake/sleep transitions, whereas cortical arousals, rapid eye movement and stable non-rapid eye movement sleep were detected accurately. The algorithm yielded accurate estimates of total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, arousal indices and times spent in different stages. The findings affirm the utility of automatic scoring of stages and arousals from a single frontopolar derivation as a method for assessment of sleep architecture in healthy adults.
© 2013 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated sleep scoring; forehead; single channel

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24313630      PMCID: PMC4156826          DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of automated scoring of polysomnographic recordings in a population with suspected sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Stephen D Pittman; Mary M MacDonald; Robert B Fogel; Atul Malhotra; Koby Todros; Baruch Levy; Amir B Geva; David P White
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Sleep stage scoring using the neural network model: comparison between visual and automatic analysis in normal subjects and patients.

Authors:  N Schaltenbrand; R Lengelle; M Toussaint; R Luthringer; G Carelli; A Jacqmin; E Lainey; A Muzet; J P Macher
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Automatic sleep stage classification using two facial electrodes.

Authors:  Jussi Virkkala; Riitta Velin; Sari-Leena Himanen; Alpo Värri; Kiti Müller; Joel Hasan
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Wrist actigraphy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martin; Alex D Hakim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  An E-health solution for automatic sleep classification according to Rechtschaffen and Kales: validation study of the Somnolyzer 24 x 7 utilizing the Siesta database.

Authors:  Peter Anderer; Georg Gruber; Silvia Parapatics; Michael Woertz; Tatiana Miazhynskaia; Gerhard Klosch; Bernd Saletu; Josef Zeitlhofer; Manuel J Barbanoj; Heidi Danker-Hopfe; Sari-Leena Himanen; Bob Kemp; Thomas Penzel; Michael Grozinger; Dieter Kunz; Peter Rappelsberger; Alois Schlogl; Georg Dorffner
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 2.328

Review 6.  The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Roger Cole; Cathy Alessi; Mark Chambers; William Moorcroft; Charles P Pollak
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Sigma (12-16 Hz) and beta (20-28 Hz) EEG discriminate NREM and REM sleep.

Authors:  S Uchida; T Maloney; I Feinberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-10-03       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The use of an ambulatory, automatic sleep recording device (QUISI version 1.0) in the evaluation of primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Y Fischer; B Junge-Hülsing; G Rettinger; A Panis
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-02

9.  Evaluation of automated and semi-automated scoring of polysomnographic recordings from a clinical trial using zolpidem in the treatment of insomnia.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetnik; Junshui Ma; Keith A Soper; Scott Doran; John J Renger; Steve Deacon; Ken S Koblan
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Automatic analysis of single-channel sleep EEG: validation in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Christian Berthomier; Xavier Drouot; Maria Herman-Stoïca; Pierre Berthomier; Jacques Prado; Djibril Bokar-Thire; Odile Benoit; Jérémie Mattout; Marie-Pia d'Ortho
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  13 in total

1.  Electro-oculography-based detection of sleep-wake in sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  Jussi Virkkala; Jussi Toppila; Paula Maasilta; Adel Bachour
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  EOG-based auto-staging: less is more.

Authors:  Christian Berthomier; Marie Brandewinder
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Performance of a New Portable Wireless Sleep Monitor.

Authors:  Magdy Younes; Marc Soiferman; Wayne Thompson; Eleni Giannouli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Accuracy of Automatic Polysomnography Scoring Using Frontal Electrodes.

Authors:  Magdy Younes; Mark Younes; Eleni Giannouli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Effect of detoxification on N3 sleep correlates with brain functional but not structural changes in alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Dardo Tomasi; Ehsan Shokri-Kojori; Peter Manza; Dana E Feldman; Danielle S Kroll; Catherine L Biesecker; Katherine L McPherson; Melanie Schwandt; Gene-Jack Wang; Corinde E Wiers; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 4.852

6.  Comparison of a single-channel EEG sleep study to polysomnography.

Authors:  Brendan P Lucey; Jennifer S Mcleland; Cristina D Toedebusch; Jill Boyd; John C Morris; Eric C Landsness; Kelvin Yamada; David M Holtzman
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient changes in human brain during sleep - Does it inform on the existence of a glymphatic system?

Authors:  Şükrü Barış Demiral; Dardo Tomasi; Joelle Sarlls; Hedok Lee; Corinde E Wiers; Amna Zehra; Tansha Srivastava; Kenneth Ke; Ehsan Shokri-Kojori; Clara R Freeman; Elsa Lindgren; Veronica Ramirez; Gregg Miller; Peter Bandettini; Silvina Horovitz; Gene-Jack Wang; Helene Benveniste; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Parasympathetic activity is reduced during slow-wave sleep, but not resting wakefulness, in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Scott J Fatt; Jessica E Beilharz; Michael Joubert; Chloe Wilson; Andrew R Lloyd; Uté Vollmer-Conna; Erin Cvejic
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 9.  Metrics of sleep apnea severity: beyond the apnea-hypopnea index.

Authors:  Atul Malhotra; Indu Ayappa; Najib Ayas; Nancy Collop; Douglas Kirsch; Nigel Mcardle; Reena Mehra; Allan I Pack; Naresh Punjabi; David P White; Daniel J Gottlieb
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.313

10.  Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial on the Effect of Proteins with Different Tryptophan/Large Neutral Amino Acid Ratios on Sleep in Adolescents: The PROTMORPHEUS Study.

Authors:  Oussama Saidi; Emmanuelle Rochette; Éric Doré; Freddy Maso; Julien Raoux; Fabien Andrieux; Maria Livia Fantini; Etienne Merlin; Bruno Pereira; Stéphane Walrand; Pascale Duché
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.