| Literature DB >> 24312375 |
Rachel S Kelly1, Thomas Lundh, Miquel Porta, Ingvar A Bergdahl, Domenico Palli, Ann-Sofie Johansson, Maria Botsivali, Paolo Vineis, Roel Vermeulen, Soterios A Kyrtopoulos, Marc Chadeau-Hyam.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) are hypothesised to be risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), a group of haematological malignancies with a suspected environmental aetiology. Within the EnviroGenoMarkers study we utilised pre-diagnostic erythrocyte concentrations of Cd and Pb to determine whether exposure was associated with risk of B-cell NHL and multiple myeloma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24312375 PMCID: PMC3842971 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of cases and controls.
| Baseline variable | Case ( | Control ( | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | (p-value) | ||
|
|
| 84 (31.1) | 84 (31.1) | |
|
| 186 (68.9) | 186 (68.9) | ||
|
|
| 133 (49.3) | 133 (49.3) | |
|
| 137 (50.7) | 137 (50.7) | ||
|
|
| 53.08 | 53.09 | 0.989 |
|
|
| 169.55 | 168.24 | 0.120 |
|
|
| 76.48 | 75.09 | 0.267 |
|
|
| 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
|
| 104 (38.5) | 109 (40.4) | ||
|
| 121 (44.8) | 118 (43.7) | ||
|
| 40 (14.8) | 39 (14.4) | ||
|
| 4 (1.5) | 4 (1.5) | 0.883 | |
|
|
| 121 (44.8) | 134 (49.6) | |
|
| 90 (33.3) | 72 (26.7) | ||
|
| 57 (21.1) | 54 (20.0) | ||
|
| 2 (0.7) | 10 (3.7) | 0.269 | |
|
|
| 4 (1.5) | 1 (0.4) | |
|
| 94 (34.8) | 98 (36.3) | ||
|
| 68 (25.2) | 54 (20.0) | ||
|
| 52 (19.3) | 64 (23.7) | ||
|
| 47 (17.4) | 42 (15.6) | ||
|
| 5 (1.9) | 11 (4.1) | 0.202 | |
|
|
| 80 (29.6) | 75 (27.8) | |
|
| 106 (39.3) | 95 (35.2) | ||
|
| 69 (25.6) | 76 (28.2) | ||
|
| 14 (5.2) | 23 (8.5) | ||
|
| 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | 0.510 | |
* P-value for difference was calculated using the chi-squared test for categorical baseline variables and the student’s t-test for continuous variables
Association between prediagnostic exposure levels of Pb by quartile and risk of B-cell NHL and Multiple myeloma.
| B-cell NHL | Multiple myeloma | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Quartile (µg/L) | Cases ( | Controls ( | OR[ | P-value |
| Quartile (µg/L) | Cases ( | Controls ( | OR[ | P-value |
|
|
| Q1 (15.423, 39.286) | 51 | 48 | 1 | Q1 (11.199, 35.133) | 17 | 19 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (39.504, 58.763) | 48 | 49 | 0.93 (0.51, 1.67) | 0.799 | Q2 (35.184, 51.973) | 20 | 19 | 1.30 (0.44, 3.86) | 0.636 | |||
| Q3 (58.832, 87.218) | 47 | 48 | 0.91 (0.47, 1.79) | 0.792 | Q3 (52.459, 79.079) | 17 | 19 | 1.17 (0.38, 3.59) | 0.781 | |||
| Q4 (87.531, 400.843) | 48 | 48 | 0.93 (0.43, 2.02) | 0.852 | 0.849 | Q4 (81.448, 672.482) | 22 | 19 | 1.63 (0.45, 5.94) | 0.459 | 0.533 | |
|
| Q1 (15.423, 35.819) | 42 | 32 | 1 | Q1 (11.199, 30.604) | 17 | 14 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (35.948, 46.842) | 29 | 33 | 0.61 (0.28, 1.33) | 0.212 | Q2 (31.563, 40.417) | 6 | 13 | 0.41 (0.11, 1.45) | 0.165 | |||
| Q3 (47.114, 60.969) | 24 | 32 | 0.53 (0.24, 1.16) | 0.111 | Q3 (41.463, 56.314) | 14 | 14 | 0.74 (0.22, 2.50) | 0.634 | |||
| Q4 (61.338, 244.382) | 36 | 33 | 0.73 (0.33, 1.62) | 0.441 | 0.488 | Q4 (57.597, 672.482) | 18 | 14 | 0.94 (0.28, 3.10) | 0.914 | 0.644 | |
|
| Q1 (39.286, 71.980) | 18 | 16 | 1 | Q1 (48.623, 81.448) | 7 | 6 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (72.363, 89.503) | 12 | 15 | 0.74 (0.29, 1.93) | 0.543 | Q2 (83.455, 92.973) | 4 | 5 | 0.70 (0.13, 3.87) | 0.682 | |||
| Q3 (89.575, 125.327) | 18 | 17 | 0.96 (0.35, 2.61) | 0.938 | Q3 (93.128, 137.177) | 6 | 5 | 1.00 (0.21, 4.71) | 1 | |||
| Q4 (133.650, 400.443) | 15 | 15 | 0.91 (0.32, 2.56) | 0.86 | 0.934 | Q4 (141.978, 228.143) | 4 | 5 | 0.62 (0.09, 4.49) | 0.636 | 0.768 | |
|
| Q1 (15.423, 44.989) | 30 | 24 | 1 | Q1 (19.898, 36.049) | 5 | 9 | ∞ | ||||
| Q2 (45.444, 61.498) | 18 | 25 | 0.57 (0.23, 1.37) | 0.208 | Q2 (38.613, 52.578) | 8 | 8 | |||||
| Q3 (61.904, 100.201) | 28 | 25 | 0.83 (0.35, 1.99) | 0.678 | Q3 (52.808, 93.128) | 14 | 8 | |||||
| Q4 (100.528, 378.943) | 23 | 24 | 0.74 (0.27, 2.04) | 0.558 | 0.742 | Q4 (97.683, 672.482) | 7 | 9 | ||||
|
| Q1 (17.019, 36.079) | 29 | 23 | 1 | Q1 (11.199, 30.604) | 12 | 10 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (36.719, 54.739) | 23 | 24 | 0.62 (0.23, 1.65) | 0.337 | Q2 (32.928, 48.623) | 10 | 11 | 0.71 (0.20, 2.57) | 0.607 | |||
| Q3 (55.401, 77.823) | 22 | 24 | 0.54 (0.20, 1.46) | 0.225 | Q3 (49.859, 75.424) | 10 | 11 | 0.71 (0.19, 2.61) | 0.606 | |||
| Q4 (78.313, 400.843) | 21 | 24 | 0.42 (0.12, 1.47) | 0.174 | 0.17 | Q4 (76.344, 220.943) | 10 | 10 | 0.74 (0.14, 3.83) | 0.715 | 0.692 | |
a Risk of NHL by exposure quartile compared to the lowest quartile (ref). Quartiles based on exposure distribution in controls. Computed using conditional logistic regression
* p<0.05
∞ Insufficient numbers for model
Association between prediagnostic exposure levels of Cd and risk of NHL.
| B-cell NHL | Multiple myeloma | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Quartile (µg/L) | Cases ( | Controls ( | OR[ | P-value |
| Quartile (µg/L) | Cases ( | Controls ( | OR[ |
|
|
|
| Q1 (0.143, 0.316) | 55 | 48 | 1 | Q1 (0.098, 0.299) | 17 | 19 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (0.318, 0.498) | 32 | 49 | 0.55 (0.30, 1.04) | 0.066 | Q2 (0.305, 0.495) | 19 | 19 | 1.14 (0.42, 3.12) | 0.787 | |||
| Q3 (0.498, 0.738) | 48 | 48 | 0.86 (0.47, 1.60) | 0.64 | Q3 (0.498, 0.938) | 21 | 19 | 1.25 (0.49, 3.17) | 0.637 | |||
| Q4 (0.741, 5.224) | 59 | 48 | 1.09 (0.61, 1.93) | 0.776 | 0.461 | Q4 (0.973, 4.113) | 19 | 19 | 1.16 (0.40, 3.40) | 0.789 | 0.744 | |
|
| Q1 (0.143, 0.268) | 32 | 32 | 1 | Q1 (0.098, 0.234) | 13 | 13 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (0.269, 0.400) | 29 | 33 | 0.93 (0.46, 1.87) | 0.831 | Q2 (0.238, 0.418) | 17 | 14 | 1.16 (0.36, 3.80) | 0.803 | |||
| Q3 (0.404, 0.669) | 32 | 32 | 1.06 (0.50, 2.27) | 0.871 | Q3 (0.419, 0.883) | 13 | 14 | 0.95 (0.30, 2.96) | 0.924 | |||
| Q4 (0.670, 5.224) | 38 | 33 | 1.20 (0.59, 2.45) | 0.614 | 0.527 | Q4 (0.973, 4.113) | 12 | 14 | 0.83 (0.21, 3.25) | 0.791 | 0.623 | |
|
| Q1 (0.208, 0.380) | 13 | 15 | 1 | Q1 (0.178, 0.401) | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (0.383, 0.556) | 11 | 17 | 0.54 (0.17, 1.68) | 0.286 | Q2 (0.461, 0.691) | 11 | 5 | 5.40 (0.58, 50.95) | 0.137 | |||
| Q3 (0.563, 0.800) | 18 | 17 | 1.25 (0.46, 3.41) | 0.666 | Q3 (0.713, 0.938) | 2 | 6 | 1.00 (0.05, 20.89) | 1 | |||
| Q4 (0.818, 3.586) | 21 | 14 | 2.09 (0.74, 5.91) | 0.163 | 0.175 | Q1 (1.083, 2.801) | 7 | 5 | 4.27 (0.39, 46.81) | 0.234 | 0.549 | |
|
| Q1 (0.143, 0.258) | 29 | 24 | 1 | Q1 (0.099, 0.195) | 6 | 8 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (0.259, 0.373) | 22 | 25 | 0.73 90.33, 1.60) | 0.433 | Q2 (0.208, 0.461) | 16 | 9 | 3.20 (0.64, 16.02) | 0.156 | |||
| Q3 (0.378, 0.800) | 28 | 25 | 0.98 (0.46, 2.08) | 0.948 | Q3 (0.468, 0.765) | 6 | 9 | 1.00 (0.24, 4.20) | 0.995 | |||
| Q4 (0.803, 5.224) | 20 | 24 | 0.65 (0.27, 1.56) | 0.333 | 0.563 | Q4 (0.778, 3.784) | 6 | 8 | 0.84 (0.11, 6.62) | 0.871 | 0.495 | |
|
| Q1 (0.185, 0.375) | 19 | 23 | 1 | Q1 (0.098, 0.383) | 10 | 10 | 1 | ||||
| Q2 (0.380, 0.556) | 15 | 24 | 0.62 (0.23, 1.64) | 0.332 | Q2 (0.394, 0.495) | 2 | 11 | 0.12 (0.01, 1.10) | 0.061 | |||
| Q3 (0.559, 0.719) | 24 | 25 | 1.21 (0.50, 2.91) | 0.671 | Q3 (0.498, 1.083) | 15 | 10 | 1.28 (0.37, 4.46) | 0.697 | |||
| Q4 (0.738, 4.324) | 37 | 23 | 1.95 (0.87, 4.37) | 0.106 | 0.052 | Q4 (1.214, 4.113) | 15 | 11 | 1.23 (0.39, 3.94) | 0.725 | 0.251 | |
a Risk of NHL by exposure quartile compared to the lowest quartile (ref). Quartiles based on exposure distribution in controls. Computed using conditional logistic regression
* p<0.05
Association between prediagnostic exposure levels of Pb and risk of NHL by subtype.
| Subtype | Population | Cases | Controls[ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| median (µg/L) |
| median (µg/L) | OR[ | P-value | ||
|
|
| 76 | 55.338 | 269 | 57.597 | 1.04 (0.57, 1.90) | 0.888 |
|
| 55 | 44.674 | 185 | 45.464 | 1.23 (0.64, 2.37) | 0.538 | |
|
| 21 | 92.373 | 84 | 89.594 | 0.33 (0.07, 1.59) | 0.168 | |
|
| 34 | 66.320 | 132 | 60.926 | 0.83 (0.35, 1.96) | 0.676 | |
|
| 42 | 47.958 | 137 | 53.407 | 1.28 (0.53, 3.08) | 0.587 | |
|
|
| 45 | 53.467 | 269 | 57.597 | 0.60 (0.26, 1.40) | 0.239 |
|
| 34 | 48.576 | 185 | 45.464 | 0.70 (0.28, 1.73) | 0.433 | |
|
| 11 | 100.328 | 84 | 89.594 | 0.38 (0.03, 5.04) | 0.459 | |
|
| 24 | 61.473 | 132 | 60.926 | 0.97 (0.35, 2.64) | 0.949 | |
|
| 21 | 53.294 | 137 | 53.407 | 0.29 (0.07, 1.18) | 0.085 | |
|
|
| 42 | 51.392 | 269 | 57.597 | 0.71 (0.32, 1.57) | 0.392 |
|
| 31 | 40.927 | 185 | 45.464 | 1.00 (0.43, 2.33) | 0.996 | |
|
| 11 | 65.845 | 84 | 89.594 | 0.12 (0.02, 0.87) | 0.036 | |
|
| 25 | 55.933 | 132 | 60.926 | 0.63 (0.23, 1.74) | 0.376 | |
|
| 17 | 44.373 | 137 | 53.407 | 0.79 (0.17, 3.60) | 0.764 | |
|
|
| 39 | 66.968 | 269 | 57.597 | 1.17 (0.52, 2.63) | 0.701 |
|
| 19 | 44.157 | 185 | 45.464 | 1.19 (0.43, 3.29) | 0.738 | |
|
| 20 | 90.278 | 84 | 89.594 | 1.14 (0.30, 4.31) | 0.850 | |
|
| 19 | 78.363 | 132 | 60.926 | 0.80 (0.25, 2.55) | 0.706 | |
|
| 20 | 66.479 | 137 | 53.407 | 1.91 (0.54, 6.78) | 0.317 | |
a For each subpopulation (Sweden, Italy, Males, Females) all controls were used, regardless of case subtype, in order to maximise power
b Risk of NHL associated with a one unit increase in log transformed exposure levels. Computed using unconditional logistic regression adjusting for sex, age, centre, batch and sample date
* p<0.05
Association between prediagnostic exposure levels of Cd and risk of NHL by subtype.
| Subtype | Population | Cases | Controls[ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| median (µg/L) |
| median (µg/L) | OR[ | P-value | ||
|
|
| 76 | 0.531 | 269 | 0.498 | 1.07 (0.77, 1.49) | 0.683 |
|
| 55 | 0.383 | 185 | 0.410 | 0.92 (0.63, 1.34) | 0.664 | |
|
| 21 | 0.603 | 84 | 0.589 | 2.34 (0.89, 6.12) | 0.084 | |
|
| 34 | 0.346 | 132 | 0.384 | 0.73 (0.43, 1.24) | 0.248 | |
|
| 42 | 0.662 | 137 | 0.543 | 1.51 (0.92, 2.46) | 0.102 | |
|
|
| 45 | 0.539 | 269 | 0.498 | 0.95 (0.61, 1.48) | 0.804 |
|
| 34 | 0.435 | 185 | 0.410 | 0.92 (0.57, 1.49) | 0.730 | |
|
| 11 | 0.633 | 84 | 0.589 | 1.50 (0.42, 5.33) | 0.529 | |
|
| 24 | 0.362 | 132 | 0.384 | 0.91 (0.51, 1.63) | 0.755 | |
|
| 21 | 0.638 | 137 | 0.543 | 1.13 (0.53, 2.39) | 0.754 | |
|
|
| 42 | 0.398 | 269 | 0.498 | 0.82 (0.52, 1.30) | 0.400 |
|
| 31 | 0.370 | 185 | 0.410 | 0.74 (0.43, 1.25) | 0.256 | |
|
| 11 | 0.904 | 84 | 0.589 | 1.04 (0.34, 3.18) | 0.950 | |
|
| 25 | 0.299 | 132 | 0.384 | 0.45 (0.21, 0.97) | 0.040 | |
|
| 17 | 0.618 | 137 | 0.543 | 1.48 (0.73, 3.00) | 0.271 | |
|
|
| 39 | 0.598 | 269 | 0.498 | 1.48 (0.94, 2.32) | 0.088 |
|
| 19 | 0.568 | 185 | 0.410 | 1.27 (0.74, 2.20) | 0.389 | |
|
| 20 | 0.606 | 84 | 0.589 | 2.83 (1.11, 7.20) | 0.029 | |
|
| 19 | 0.538 | 132 | 0.384 | 1.52 (0.87, 2.67) | 0.141 | |
|
| 20 | 0.599 | 137 | 0.543 | 1.51 (0.70, 3.25) | 0.293 | |
a For each subpopulation (Sweden, Italy, Males, Females) all controls were used, regardless of case subtype, in order to maximise power
b Risk of NHL associated with a one unit increased in log transformed exposure levels. Computed using unconditional logistic regression adjusting for sex, age, centre, batch and sample date
* p<0.05
Number (%) of cases and controls above toxic levels of Pb (>100µg/L) and association with NHL.
| Subtype | Population | Cases n. (%) | Controls n. (%) | OR[ | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1.10 (0.60, 2.02) | 0.758 |
|
|
|
| 1.29 (0.48, 3.45) | 0.618 | |
|
|
|
| 1.00 (0.46, 2.16) | 1.000 | |
|
|
|
| 0.93 (0.44, 1.98) | 0.847 | |
|
|
|
| 1.50 (0.53, 4.21) | 0.442 | |
|
|
|
|
| 1.29 (0.48, 3.45) | 0.618 |
|
|
|
| 2.50 (0.49,12.89) | 0.273 | |
|
|
|
| 0.80 (0.21, 2.98) | 0.739 | |
|
|
|
| 0.80 (0.21, 2.98) | 0.739 | |
|
|
|
| 2.50 (0.49, 12.89) | 0.273 |
a Risk of NHL in those above the toxic level of exposure compared to the risk of NHL in those below the toxic level of exposure. Computed using conditional logistic regression
* p<0.05
Number (%) of cases and controls above toxic levels of Cd (>1µg/L) and association with NHL.
| Subtype | Population | Cases n. (%) | Controls n. (%) | OR[ | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1.39 (0.81, 2.38) | 0.227 |
|
|
|
| 1.11 (0.59, 2.10) | 0.746 | |
|
|
|
| 2.40 (0.85, 6.81) | 0.100 | |
|
|
|
| 0.77 (0.34, 1.75) | 0.533 | |
|
|
|
| 2.20 (1.04, 4.65) | 0.039 | |
|
|
|
|
| 1.09 (0.48, 2.47) | 0.835 |
|
|
|
| 0.88 (0.32, 2.41) | 0.796 | |
|
|
|
| 1.67 (0.40, 6.97) | 0.484 | |
|
|
|
| 0.50 (0.09, 2.73) | 0.423 | |
|
|
|
| 1.43 (0.54, 3.75) | 0.469 |
a Risk of NHL in those above the toxic level of exposure compared to the risk of NHL in those below the toxic level of exposure. Computed using conditional logistic regression
* p<0.05