OBJECTIVES: Low-level cadmium exposure, resulting in, for example, urinary cadmium <2.0 μg/g creatinine, is widespread; recent data suggest nephrotoxicity even at these low levels. Few studies have examined the impact of low-level cadmium exposure in workers who are occupationally exposed to other nephrotoxicants such as lead. METHODS: We evaluated associations of urine cadmium, a measure of cumulative dose, with four glomerular filtration measures and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) in lead workers. Recent and cumulative lead doses were assessed via blood and tibia lead, respectively. RESULTS: In 712 lead workers, mean (SD) blood and tibia lead values, urine cadmium values and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation were 23.1 (14.1) μg/dl, 26.6 (28.9) μg Pb/g bone mineral, 1.15 (0.66) μg/g creatinine and 97.4 (19.2) ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, urine creatinine, smoking, alcohol, education, annual income, diastolic blood pressure, current or former lead worker job status, new or returning study participant, and blood and tibia lead, higher ln-urine cadmium was associated with higher calculated creatinine clearance, eGFR (β = 8.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2); 95% CI 5.4 to 12.1) and ln-NAG but lower serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Potential explanations for these results include a normal physiological response in which urine cadmium levels reflect renal filtration, the impact of adjustment for urine dilution with creatinine in models of kidney outcomes, and cadmium-related hyperfiltration.
OBJECTIVES: Low-level cadmium exposure, resulting in, for example, urinary cadmium <2.0 μg/g creatinine, is widespread; recent data suggest nephrotoxicity even at these low levels. Few studies have examined the impact of low-level cadmium exposure in workers who are occupationally exposed to other nephrotoxicants such as lead. METHODS: We evaluated associations of urine cadmium, a measure of cumulative dose, with four glomerular filtration measures and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) in lead workers. Recent and cumulative lead doses were assessed via blood and tibia lead, respectively. RESULTS: In 712 lead workers, mean (SD) blood and tibia lead values, urine cadmium values and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation were 23.1 (14.1) μg/dl, 26.6 (28.9) μg Pb/g bone mineral, 1.15 (0.66) μg/g creatinine and 97.4 (19.2) ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, urine creatinine, smoking, alcohol, education, annual income, diastolic blood pressure, current or former lead worker job status, new or returning study participant, and blood and tibia lead, higher ln-urine cadmium was associated with higher calculated creatinine clearance, eGFR (β = 8.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2); 95% CI 5.4 to 12.1) and ln-NAG but lower serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Potential explanations for these results include a normal physiological response in which urine cadmium levels reflect renal filtration, the impact of adjustment for urine dilution with creatinine in models of kidney outcomes, and cadmium-related hyperfiltration.
Authors: Andrew C Todd; Patrick J Parsons; Spencer Carroll; Ciaran Geraghty; Fuad A Khan; Shida Tang; Erin L Moshier Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: B S Schwartz; B K Lee; G S Lee; W F Stewart; S S Lee; K Y Hwang; K D Ahn; Y B Kim; K I Bolla; D Simon; P J Parsons; A C Todd Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J A Staessen; T Nawrot; E D Hond; L Thijs; R Fagard; K Hoppenbrouwers; G Koppen; V Nelen; G Schoeters; D Vanderschueren; E Van Hecke; L Verschaeve; R Vlietinck; H A Roels Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-05-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: V M Weaver; B-K Lee; K-D Ahn; G-S Lee; A C Todd; W F Stewart; J Wen; D J Simon; P J Parsons; B S Schwartz Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; James P Lash; Robert G Nelson; Mahboob Rahman; Amy E Deysher; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Christopher H Schmid; Andrew S Levey Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Claire de Burbure; Jean-Pierre Buchet; Alfred Bernard; Ariane Leroyer; Catherine Nisse; Jean-Marie Haguenoer; Enrico Bergamaschi; Antonio Mutti Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2003-05-09
Authors: Curtis W Noonan; Sara M Sarasua; Dave Campagna; Steven J Kathman; Jeffrey A Lybarger; Patricia W Mueller Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Melanie C Buser; Susan Z Ingber; Nathan Raines; David A Fowler; Franco Scinicariello Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Virginia M Weaver; Nam-Soo Kim; Byung-Kook Lee; Patrick J Parsons; June Spector; Jeffrey Fadrowski; Bernard G Jaar; Amy J Steuerwald; Andrew C Todd; David Simon; Brian S Schwartz Journal: Environ Res Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Virginia M Weaver; Gonzalo García Vargas; Ellen K Silbergeld; Stephen J Rothenberg; Jeffrey J Fadrowski; Marisela Rubio-Andrade; Patrick J Parsons; Amy J Steuerwald; Ana Navas-Acien; Eliseo Guallar Journal: Environ Res Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Rebecca Shelley; Nam-Soo Kim; Patrick Parsons; Byung-Kook Lee; Bernard Jaar; Jeffrey Fadrowski; Jacqueline Agnew; Genevieve M Matanoski; Brian S Schwartz; Amy Steuerwald; Andrew Todd; David Simon; Virginia M Weaver Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Rebecca Shelley; Nam-Soo Kim; Patrick J Parsons; Byung-Kook Lee; Jacqueline Agnew; Bernard G Jaar; Amy J Steuerwald; Genevieve Matanoski; Jeffrey Fadrowski; Brian S Schwartz; Andrew C Todd; David Simon; Virginia M Weaver Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Anna Z Pollack; Germaine M Buck Louis; Zhen Chen; C Matthew Peterson; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Mary S Croughan; Liping Sun; Mary L Hediger; Joseph B Stanford; Michael W Varner; Christopher D Palmer; Amy J Steuerwald; Patrick J Parsons Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.143