| Literature DB >> 30349672 |
Majekodunmi R Adedayo1,2, Jacob K Akintunde3, Alhassan Sani2, Aline A Boligon4.
Abstract
Mono-culture fermentation by Rhizopus stolonifer could promote the healthiness of immune systems and cholesterol levels. Hence, we examined the effect of diet from mono-culture fermentation of Moringa oleifera seeds by R. stolonifer (MCF-MORS) on hematological parameters and fundamental indicators of hypercholesterolemia in rat. The animals were divided into six groups (n = 6). Group 1 was placed on basal diet. Group II, III, IV and V were placed on a basal diets supplemented with 7.5%, 15%, 22.5% and 30%, respectively, of MCF-MORS. Group VI was placed on basal diet fed with unfermented M. oleifera seeds (UF-MOS). The experiment lasted for eight weeks. The results revealed 7.5% MCF-MORS as better biological method to augment PCV, RBC and Hb count in animal model. Also, 7.5% and/or 15% MCF-MORS demonstrated highest levels in centrophils, neutrophils and eosinophils, whereas the levels of lymphocytes, basophils and monocytes showed no significant difference. Similarly, 7.5% and 15% MCF-MORS modulated LDL and HDL, respectively, better than UF-MOS; but showing no difference in cholesterol level. MCF-MORS also maintained architectural integrity of villi and splenocytes better than UF-MOS. We therefore concluded that diet from MCF-MORS at 7.5% and 15% modulates HDL, LDL, cholesterol and immune system-related disorders better than UF-MOS in rat model.Entities:
Keywords: Moringa oleifera; Rhizopus stolonifer; fermentation; hematology; lipid profile; mono‐culture; rat
Year: 2018 PMID: 30349672 PMCID: PMC6189616 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Diet formulation for basal and supplemented diets in control and test groups
| Treatment | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn meal | 50.6 | 50.6 | 50.6 | 50.6 | 50.6 | 50.6 |
| Cellulose | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Sucrose | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Premix | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| D‐methionine | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Oil | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Soya bean meal | 30.0 | 22.5 | 15.0 | 7.5 | — | — |
| MCF‐MORS | — | 7.5 | 15.0 | 22.5 | 30.0 | — |
| UF‐MOS | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0 |
| Total (g) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
MCF‐MORS: Diet from Mono‐culture fermentation of MO seeds by Rhizopus stolonifer; UF‐MOS: Diet from unfermented MO seeds.
The vitamin premix (mg or IU/g) has the following composition; 3200 IU vitamin A, 600 IU vitamin D3, 2.8 mg vitamin E, 0.6 mg vitamin K3, 0.8 mg vitamin B1, 1 mg vitamin B2, 6 mg niacin, 2.2 mg pantothenic acid, 0.8 mg vitamin B6, 0.004 mg vitamin B12, 0.2 mg folic acid, 0.1 mg biotin H2, 70 mg choline chloride, 0.08 mg cobalt, 1.2 mg copper, 0.4 mg iodine, 8.4 mg iron, 16 mg manganese, 0.08 mg selenium, 12.4 mg zinc, 0.5 mg antioxidant. Group 1: serve as the control group placed on a basal diet; Group 2: serve as the group placed on a basal diet supplemented with 7.5% of mono‐culture fermented pulverized seeds of Moringa oleifera Group 3: serve as the group placed on a basal diet supplemented with 15% of mono‐culture fermented pulverized seeds of M. oleifera; Group 4: serve as the group placed on a basal diet supplemented with 22.5% of mono‐culture fermented pulverized seeds of M. oleifera; Group 5: serve as the group placed on a basal diet supplemented with 30% of mono‐culture fermented pulverized seeds of M. oleifera; Group 6: (Negative control) serve as the normal group placed on a basal diet supplemented with 30% of unfermented pulverized seeds of M. oleifera.
Proximate composition (%) of the diets used to feed the control and test groups
| Group | MC | DM | CP | CF | CFB | TA | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 7.25 | 92.75 | 27.92 | 6.94 | 3.95 | 4.74 | 49.10 |
| Group 2 | 7.65 | 92.35 | 27.95 | 8.45 | 3.81 | 3.27 | 48.87 |
| Group 3 | 7.40 | 92.60 | 27.60 | 8.40 | 3.90 | 3.39 | 49.31 |
| Group 4 | 7.33 | 92.67 | 27.20 | 8.73 | 3.64 | 3.50 | 49.60 |
| Group 5 | 7.15 | 92.85 | 26.87 | 8.95 | 4.02 | 3.57 | 49.44 |
| Group 6 | 8.02 | 91.98 | 24.00 | 10.63 | 3.75 | 3.05 | 36.51 |
MC: moisture content; DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; CF: crude fat; CFB: crude fiber; TA: total ash; N: Nitrogen.
Effect of mono‐culture fermentation of Moringa oleifera seeds by Rhizopus stolonifer on proximate composition (g/100 g) between 0 and 72 hr
| Fermentation period (hr) | MC | TA | CP | CF | CFB | CHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7.81 ± 1.40a | 2.35 ± 0.06a | 21.10 ± 1.62a | 27.44 ± 0.25a | 4.39 ± 0.64a | 27.44 ± 8.13a |
| 24 | 5.93 ± 1.28a | 2.34 ± 0.06a | 32.34 ± 0.41b | 26.62 ± 0.23a | 4.49 ± 0.75a | 26.62 ± 4.79a |
| 48 | 6.10 ± 0.69a | 2.58 ± 0.13b | 32.98 ± 0.48b | 25.03 ± 2.45a | 4.63 ± 0.95a | 25.03 ± 2.05a |
| 72 | 5.38 ± 1.16a | 3.15 ± 0.00b | 31.96 ± 0.00b | 30.43 ± 0.00ab | 5.28 ± 0.00a | 30.43 ± 0.00ab |
MC: moisture content; DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; CF: crude fat; CFB: crude fiber; TA: total ash; N: Nitrogen.
Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 2). Bars with different letters on the same column are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Effect of mono‐culture fermentation of Moringa oleifera seed by Rhizopus stolonifer on anti‐nutrients composition
| Phytochemical | UF‐MOS (mg/g) | MCF‐MORS (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Saponin | 8.58 | 1.86 |
| Oxalate | 4.86 | 1.88 |
| Tannins | 3.37 | 0.26 |
| Phytate | 2.96 | 0.35 |
Effect of mono‐culture fermentation by Rhizopus stolonifer on some macro and micro‐elements using Moringa oleifera seed as substrate
| Element | UF‐MOS (mg/100 g) | MCF‐MORS (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|
| Potassium | 97.00 ± 0.0a | 120.8 ± 0.03b |
| Sodium | 190.00 ± 0.0b | 89.7 ± 0.70a |
| Calcium | 758.00 ± 0.0b | 210.6 ± 2.1a |
| Magnesium | 308.00 ± 0.0a | 1690.0 ± 2.1b |
| Manganese | 28.00 ± 0.0b | 15.12 ± 1.4a |
| Iron | 94.00 ± 0.0a | 104.95 ± 2.3b |
| Zinc | 67.30 ± 0.0b | 37.67 ± 0.35a |
| Copper | 5.00 ± 0.0a | 8.18 ± 0.00b |
| Cadmium | 2.54 ± 0.00b | 0.50 ± 0.34a |
| Lead | 8.20 ± 0.0b | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
Data are presented as mean± SD (n = 2). Bars with different letters on the same row are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS o n body weight growth in rat
| Group | Initial body Weight (g) | Final body Weight (g) | Weight gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 43.3 ± 2.5a | 92.8 ± 3.5bc | 49.5 ± 1.0ab |
| Group 2 | 43.5 ± 3.5a | 94.0 ± 3.0ab | 51.5 ± 6.5b |
| Group 3 | 43.5 ± 2.5a | 105.5 ± 0.5bc | 58.5 ± 2.0c |
| Group 4 | 45.0 ± 5.0a | 108.0 ± 5.0c | 65.6 ± 2.5c |
| Group 5 | 45.0 ± 10.0a | 94.0 ± 1.0abc | 49.0 ± 11.0ab |
| Group 6 | 45.5 ± 2.5a | 76.0 ± 5.0a | 30.5 ± 2.5a |
Values represent mean ± SD, n = 6; Values with different superscript on the same column are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Figure 1Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on Part Cell Volume (PCV) in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 2Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on Red Blood Cells (RBC) in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 3Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on Hemoglobin (Hb) in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 4Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on White Blood Cells (WBC) in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 6Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on lymphocytes in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 5Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on Neutrophils in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 7Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on Centrophils in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 8Representative high performance liquid chromatography profile of black seed aqueous extract. Gallic acid (peak 1), caffeic acid (peak 2), p‐coumaric acid (peak 3), Rutin (peak 4), quercetin (peak 5), luteolin (peak 6), and apigenin (peak 7)
Composition of phenolic compounds in MO seeds
| Compounds |
| LOD (μg/ml) | LOQ (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 2.46 ± 0.01a | 0.021 | 0.068 |
| Caffeic acid | 1.53 ± 0.01b | 0.018 | 0.059 |
| p‐coumaric acid | 3.11 ± 0.03c | 0.009 | 0.030 |
| Rutin | 0.97 ± 0.02d | 0.025 | 0.082 |
| Quercetin | 1.45 ± 0.01b | 0.009 | 0.030 |
| Luteolin | 6.05 ± 0.04e | 0.027 | 0.089 |
| Apigenin | 1.49 ± 0.03b | 0.015 | 0.049 |
The results are expressed as mean ± SEM of three determinations. Comparing various groups, different letters indicate statistically significant findings.
Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on eosinophil, monocytes, and basophils in treated rat
| Marker | Eosinophil (%) | Monocytes (%) | Basophils (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00 |
| Group 2 | 0.00a | 2.5 ± 0.5a | 0.00 |
| Group 3 | 0.00a | 1.00a | 0.00 |
| Group 4 | 0.00a | 1.50a | 0.00 |
| Group 5 | 1.00a | 0.00a | 0.00 |
| Group 6 | 3.5 ± 0.5b | 0.00a | 0.00 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different.
Figure 9Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on high‐density lipoproteins (HDL) in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 10Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on low‐density lipoproteins (LDL) in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 11Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on cholesterol in treated rat. Data are presented as mean ± (n = 6). Bars with different letters are statistically different
Figure 12(Groups 1‐6) Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on small intestine of treated rat. (Group 1) showed normal and visible intestinal architecture (NVIA), that is, the villi were intact and normal architectural structures of the intestinal membrane were observed (Group 2) showed normal and visible intestinal architecture (NVIA) (Group 3) depicted normal and visible intestinal architecture (NVIA) (Group 4) revealed intact and normal architectural structures (NVIA) of the membrane and the villi were not affected. (Group 5) showed mild focal loss of the overlaying mucosa (MFLOM) (Group 6) showed focal loss of the overlaying mucosa (FLOM)
Figure 13(Groups 1‐6) Effect of MCF‐MORS and UF‐MOS on spleen of treated rat. (Group 1) showed normal and visible spleen architecture (NVSA) (Group 2) showed normal and visible spleen architecture (NVSA) (Group 3) depicted normal and visible spleen architecture (NVSA) (Group 4) revealed normal spleen architectural structures (NVSA) (Group 5) showed mild degeneration of spleen cells (MDSC) (Group 6) showed nonchromic and distorted cells (NCDC)