Literature DB >> 2431110

Use of in vitro dose response effects to select antineoplastics for high-dose or regional administration regimens.

D D Von Hoff, G M Clark, G R Weiss, M H Marshall, J B Buchok, W A Knight, C F LeMaistre.   

Abstract

Several preclinical and clinical studies have documented that dose or dose intensity of chemotherapeutic agents are important factors for response of patients' tumors. This finding has prompted empiric trials of certain chemotherapeutic agents in high-dose or regional administration treatment regimens. The present study was performed to identify agents that would be particularly good candidates for high-dose or regional administration regimens against particular types of tumors. Using a human tumor cloning technique, we constructed dose in vitro response lines for ten different chemotherapeutic agents against seven different histologic types of malignancies. Slopes of the lines indicated the agents with the greatest increases of in vitro response per increment in dose of the agent. Tumors against which the agents gave the steepest dose response lines included lymphoma, head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, and small-cell lung cancer, while the dose response lines for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and colon cancer were quite flat. Suggestions for clinical trials based on these findings include the use of high-dose melphalan for patients with lymphoma, head and neck, and ovarian cancer; the use of mitoxantrone in high-dose regimens for patients with breast cancer; high-dose cisplatin regimens for patients with small-cell lung cancer; high-dose bleomycin regimens for patients with non-small-cell lung and head and neck cancer; and regional perfusion of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with cisplatin. Prospective testing of high-dose or regional administration regimens suggested by this new model should indicate its use for prediction of the best agent to use in high-dose regimens against a particular tumor type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2431110     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.12.1827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

1.  Extremely prolonged continuous intraperitoneal infusion of cytosine arabinoside.

Authors:  S Kirmani; S Zimm; S M Cleary; J Mowry; S B Howell
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Impact of superselective transarterial infusion therapy of high-dose cisplatin on maxillary cancer with orbital invasion.

Authors:  M Kanoto; A Oda; T Hosoya; K Nemoto; A Ishida; T Nasu; S Koike; M Aoyagi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Stability of solutions of antineoplastic agents during preparation and storage for in vitro assays. III. Antimetabolites, tubulin-binding agents, platinum drugs, amsacrine, L-asparaginase, interferons, steroids and other miscellaneous antitumor agents.

Authors:  A G Bosanquet
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Heterogeneity of in vitro chemosensitivity in perioperative breast cancer cells to mitoxantrone versus doxorubicin evaluated by a microplate ATP bioluminescence assay.

Authors:  C M Kurbacher; I A Cree; U Brenne; H W Bruckner; J A Kurbacher; P Mallmann; P E Andreotti; D Krebs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Selective intra-arterial infusion of high-dose cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck cancer results in high tumor platinum concentrations and cisplatin-DNA adduct formation.

Authors:  G Los; f A Blommaert; R Barton; D D Heath; L den Engelse; C Hanchett; D Vicario; R Weisman; K T Robbins; S B Howell
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  High-dose mitoxantrone with peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue: toxicity, pharmacokinetics and implications for dosage and schedule.

Authors:  A Ballestrero; F Ferrando; A Garuti; P Basta; R Gonella; M Esposito; M O Vannozzi; G Sorice; D Friedman; M Puglisi; F Brema; G S Mela; M Sessarego; F Patrone
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  The pharmacologic basis of high dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumours.

Authors:  L F Porrata; A A Adjei
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-08-17       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Comprehensive Molecular Characterization Identifies Distinct Genomic and Immune Hallmarks of Renal Medullary Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pavlos Msaouel; Gabriel G Malouf; Xiaoping Su; Hui Yao; Durga N Tripathi; Melinda Soeung; Jianjun Gao; Priya Rao; Cristian Coarfa; Chad J Creighton; Jean-Philippe Bertocchio; Selvi Kunnimalaiyaan; Asha S Multani; Jorge Blando; Rong He; Daniel D Shapiro; Luigi Perelli; Sanjana Srinivasan; Federica Carbone; Patrick G Pilié; Menuka Karki; Riyad N H Seervai; Bujamin H Vokshi; Dolores Lopez-Terrada; Emily H Cheng; Ximing Tang; Wei Lu; Ignacio I Wistuba; Timothy C Thompson; Irwin Davidson; Virginia Giuliani; Katharina Schlacher; Alessandro Carugo; Timothy P Heffernan; Padmanee Sharma; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Cheryl L Walker; Giannicola Genovese; Nizar M Tannir
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Long-term safety and survival outcomes from the Scandinavian Breast Group 2004-1 randomized phase II trial of tailored dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Alexios Matikas; Sara Margolin; Mats Hellström; Hemming Johansson; Nils-Olof Bengtsson; Lena Karlsson; Per Edlund; Per Karlsson; Elisabet Lidbrink; Barbro Linderholm; Henrik Lindman; Per Malmstrom; Kenneth Villman; Theodoros Foukakis; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.