Literature DB >> 8944334

Heterogeneity of in vitro chemosensitivity in perioperative breast cancer cells to mitoxantrone versus doxorubicin evaluated by a microplate ATP bioluminescence assay.

C M Kurbacher1, I A Cree, U Brenne, H W Bruckner, J A Kurbacher, P Mallmann, P E Andreotti, D Krebs.   

Abstract

Apart from clinical trials, mitoxantrone (MX) is rarely used in breast cancer (BC) due to the anticipated anthracycline cross-resistance. We have examined this drug versus doxorubicin (DOX) using data obtained from in vitro microplate ATP tumor chemosensitivity assays (ATP-TCA) of BC cells which were derived from 55 chemotherapy-naive patients at time of primary surgery. Both drugs were tested at 6 different concentrations ranging from 6.25% to 200% peak plasma concentration in vivo (PPC). Differences between DOX and MX observed for mean IC50, IC90, and a sensitivity index (SI) were not statistically significant. In vitro response rates were 44% for DOX and 52% for MX. 34 of 52 eligible assays (65%) showed comparable activity of both drugs whereas a lack of cross-resistance was observed in the remaining 18 (35%) tumors as indicated by differences for SI. Cumulative concentration-response plots of tumors responding in vitro with a > or = 50 percent or > or = 90 percent tumor cell inhibition showed a strong dose-dependence for both DOX and MX at concentrations which normally can be achieved within clinical tumors (i.e. 6.25%-50% PPC). At higher concentrations, however, cytotoxicity of DOX and MX could not be improved by further in vitro dose escalation. Moreover, a substantial proportion of BC specimens (DOX: 48.1%; MX: 40.4%) did not experience a > or = 90 tumor cell inhibition at 200% PPC. In conclusion, in vitro results obtained by ATP-TCA indicate that there is no cross-resistance between MX and DOX in a substantial proportion of BC patients. This may be clinically useful and suggests that combinations including MX should be tested in patients clinically resistant to DOX containing regimens. Since both drugs produced sigmoidal concentration-response curves, dose escalation beyond a certain point may not produce increased sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8944334     DOI: 10.1007/bf01807161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  30 in total

Review 1.  Stability of solutions of antineoplastic agents during preparation and storage for in vitro assays. II. Assay methods, adriamycin and the other antitumour antibiotics.

Authors:  A G Bosanquet
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  The effect on survival of initial chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: polychemotherapy versus single drug.

Authors:  D L Ahmann; D J Schaid; H F Bisel; R G Hahn; J H Edmonson; J N Ingle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The contribution of medicine to the primary treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  1-Phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. A report of early findings.

Authors:  B Fisher; P Carbone; S G Economou; R Frelick; A Glass; H Lerner; C Redmond; M Zelen; P Band; D L Katrych; N Wolmark; E R Fisher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of MTT and ATP-based assays for the measurement of viable cell number.

Authors:  R D Petty; L A Sutherland; E M Hunter; I A Cree
Journal:  J Biolumin Chemilumin       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb

6.  In vitro activity of titanocenedichloride versus cisplatin and doxorubicin in primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C M Kurbacher; P Mallmann; J A Kurbacher; G Sass; P E Andreotti; A Rahmun; H Hübner; D Krebs
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  P E Andreotti; I A Cree; C M Kurbacher; D M Hartmann; D Linder; G Harel; I Gleiberman; P A Caruso; S H Ricks; M Untch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes. Ten-year results.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; M Zambetti; P Valagussa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  H B Muss; A D Thor; D A Berry; T Kute; E T Liu; F Koerner; C T Cirrincione; D R Budman; W C Wood; M Barcos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Use of in vitro dose response effects to select antineoplastics for high-dose or regional administration regimens.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; G M Clark; G R Weiss; M H Marshall; J B Buchok; W A Knight; C F LeMaistre
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  Individualized tumor response testing for prediction of response to Paclitaxel and Cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Yeul Hong Kim; Kyung Hee Lee; Do Youn Oh; Joonhee Kim; Sung Hyun Yang; Seock-Ah Im; Sung Ho Choi; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Cancer cell adaptation to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Stuart J Mercer; Louise A Knight; Francis G Gabriel; Pauline A Whitehouse; Sanjay Sharma; Augusta Fernando; Sharon Glaysher; Silvana Di Palma; Penny Johnson; Shaw S Somers; Simon Toh; Bernie Higgins; Alan Lamont; Tim Gulliford; Jeremy Hurren; Constantinos Yiangou; Ian A Cree
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Role of the progesterone receptor for paclitaxel resistance in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M Schmidt; E Bremer; D Hasenclever; A Victor; M Gehrmann; E Steiner; I B Schiffer; S Gebhardt; H-A Lehr; M Mahlke; M Hermes; A Mustea; B Tanner; H Koelbl; H Pilch; J G Hengstler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study: Association of Genetic Alterations in the Apoptosis Pathways with Chemoresistance to Doxorubicin.

Authors:  Evgeny M Kirilin; Timur I Fetisov; Natalia I Moiseeva; Ekaterina A Lesovaya; Lidia A Laletina; Leyla F Makhmudova; Angelika E Manikaylo; Liliya Y Fomina; Denis A Burov; Beniamin Yu Bokhyan; Victoria Y Zinovieva; Alice S Vilkova; Larisa V Mekheda; Nikolay A Kozlov; Alexander M Scherbakov; Gennady A Belitsky; Vytas Švedas; Kirill I Kirsanov; Marianna G Yakubovskaya
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Analysis of Multiple Drug Resistance Mechanism in Different Types of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Assessment of the Expression of ABC-Transporters, MVP, YB-1, and Analysis of Their Correlation with Chemosensitivity of Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Natalia I Moiseeva; Lidia A Laletina; Timur I Fetisov; Leyla F Makhmudova; Angelika E Manikaylo; Liliya Y Fomina; Denis A Burov; Ekaterina A Lesovaya; Beniamin Y Bokhyan; Victoria Y Zinovieva; Alice S Vilkova; Larisa V Mekheda; Nikolay A Kozlov; Alexander M Scherbakov; Evgeny M Kirilin; Gennady A Belitsky; Marianna G Yakubovskaya; Kirill I Kirsanov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.