BACKGROUND: Lack of regular physical activity is highly prevalent in U.S. adults and significantly increases mortality risk. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical impact of a newly implemented program ("Exercise as a Vital Sign" [EVS]) designed to systematically ascertain patient-reported exercise levels at the beginning of each outpatient visit. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The EVS program was implemented in four of 11 medical centers between April 2010 and October 2011 within a single health delivery system (Kaiser Permanente Northern California). We used a quasi-experimental analysis approach to compare visit-level and patient-level outcomes among practices with and without the EVS program. Our longitudinal observational cohort included over 1.5 million visits by 696,267 adults to 1,196 primary care providers. MAIN MEASURES: Exercise documentation in physician progress notes; lifestyle-related referrals (e.g. exercise programs, nutrition and weight loss consultation); patient report of physician exercise counseling; weight change among overweight/obese patients; and HbA1c changes among patients with diabetes. KEY RESULTS: EVS implementation was associated with greater exercise-related progress note documentation (26.2 % vs 23.7 % of visits, aOR 1.12 [95 % CI: 1.11-1.13], p < 0.001) and referrals (2.1 % vs 1.7 %; aOR 1.14 [1.11-1.18], p < 0.001) compared to visits without EVS. Surveyed patients (n = 6,880) were more likely to report physician exercise counseling (88 % vs. 76 %, p < 0.001). Overweight patients (BMI 25-29 kg/m(2), n = 230,326) had greater relative weight loss (0.20 [0.12 - 0.28] lbs, p < 0.001) and patients with diabetes and baseline HbA1c > 7.0 % (n = 30,487) had greater relative HbA1c decline (0.1 % [0.07 %-0.13 %], p < 0.001) in EVS practices compared to non-EVS practices. CONCLUSIONS: Systematically collecting exercise information during outpatient visits is associated with small but significant changes in exercise-related clinical processes and outcomes, and represents a valuable first step towards addressing the problem of inadequate physical activity.
BACKGROUND: Lack of regular physical activity is highly prevalent in U.S. adults and significantly increases mortality risk. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical impact of a newly implemented program ("Exercise as a Vital Sign" [EVS]) designed to systematically ascertain patient-reported exercise levels at the beginning of each outpatient visit. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The EVS program was implemented in four of 11 medical centers between April 2010 and October 2011 within a single health delivery system (Kaiser Permanente Northern California). We used a quasi-experimental analysis approach to compare visit-level and patient-level outcomes among practices with and without the EVS program. Our longitudinal observational cohort included over 1.5 million visits by 696,267 adults to 1,196 primary care providers. MAIN MEASURES: Exercise documentation in physician progress notes; lifestyle-related referrals (e.g. exercise programs, nutrition and weight loss consultation); patient report of physician exercise counseling; weight change among overweight/obesepatients; and HbA1c changes among patients with diabetes. KEY RESULTS:EVS implementation was associated with greater exercise-related progress note documentation (26.2 % vs 23.7 % of visits, aOR 1.12 [95 % CI: 1.11-1.13], p < 0.001) and referrals (2.1 % vs 1.7 %; aOR 1.14 [1.11-1.18], p < 0.001) compared to visits without EVS. Surveyed patients (n = 6,880) were more likely to report physician exercise counseling (88 % vs. 76 %, p < 0.001). Overweight patients (BMI 25-29 kg/m(2), n = 230,326) had greater relative weight loss (0.20 [0.12 - 0.28] lbs, p < 0.001) and patients with diabetes and baseline HbA1c > 7.0 % (n = 30,487) had greater relative HbA1c decline (0.1 % [0.07 %-0.13 %], p < 0.001) in EVS practices compared to non-EVS practices. CONCLUSIONS: Systematically collecting exercise information during outpatient visits is associated with small but significant changes in exercise-related clinical processes and outcomes, and represents a valuable first step towards addressing the problem of inadequate physical activity.
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Howard H Moffet; Jennifer Liu; Melissa M Parker; Ameena T Ahmed; Assiamira Ferrara; Joe V Selby Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Michael F Leitzmann; Yikyung Park; Aaron Blair; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Traci Mouw; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-12-10
Authors: Louise H Anderson; Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Nicolaas P Pronk; Robin R Whitebird; Patrick J O''Connor; Lawrence J Fine Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Anjali Gopalan; Pranita Mishra; Stacey E Alexeeff; Maruta A Blatchins; Eileen Kim; Alan Man; Andrew J Karter; Richard W Grant Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Felipe Lobelo; Heval M Kelli; Sheri Chernetsky Tejedor; Michael Pratt; Michael V McConnell; Seth S Martin; Gregory J Welk Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: Walter R Thompson; Robert Sallis; Elizabeth Joy; Carrie A Jaworski; Robyn M Stuhr; Jennifer L Trilk Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2020-04-22
Authors: R E Clark; C McArthur; A Papaioannou; A M Cheung; J Laprade; L Lee; R Jain; L M Giangregorio Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Mohammed K Ali; Frank Wharam; O Kenrik Duru; Julie Schmittdiel; Ronald T Ackermann; Jeanine Albu; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Christine M Hunter; Carol Mangione; Edward W Gregg Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.810