R E Clark1, C McArthur1, A Papaioannou2,3, A M Cheung4, J Laprade4,5, L Lee2,6,7, R Jain5, L M Giangregorio8,9,10,11. 1. University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. 2. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. 3. Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Canada. 4. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada. 5. Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy & Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto, ON, M3C 1H9, Canada. 6. Centre for Family Medicine, Kitchener, Canada. 7. Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, ON, N2J 0E2, Canada. 8. University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. lmgiangr@uwaterloo.ca. 9. Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Canada. lmgiangr@uwaterloo.ca. 10. Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, ON, N2J 0E2, Canada. lmgiangr@uwaterloo.ca. 11. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. lmgiangr@uwaterloo.ca.
Abstract
Guidelines for physical activity exist and following them would improve health. Physicians can advise patients on physical activity. We found barriers related to physicians' knowledge, a lack of tools and of physician incentives, and competing demands for limited time with a patient. We discuss interventions that could reduce these barriers. INTRODUCTION: Uptake of physical activity (PA) guidelines would improve health and reduce mortality in older adults. However, physicians face barriers in guideline implementation, particularly when faced with needing to tailor recommendations in the presence of chronic disease. We performed a behavioral analysis of physician barriers to PA guideline implementation and to identify interventions. The Too Fit To Fracture physical activity recommendations were used as an example of disease-specific PA guidelines. METHODS: Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians and nurse practitioners in Ontario, stratified by type of physician, geographic area, and urban/rural, and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers coded data and identified emerging themes. Using the behavior change wheel framework, themes were categorized into capability, opportunity and motivation, and interventions were identified. RESULTS: Fifty-nine family physicians, specialists, and nurse practitioners participated. Barriers were as follows: Capability-lack of exercise knowledge or where to refer; Opportunity-pragmatic tools, fit within existing workflow, available programs that meet patients' needs, physical activity literacy and cultural practices; Motivation-lack of incentives, not in their scope of practice or professional identity, competing priorities, outcome expectancies. Interventions selected: education, environmental restructuring, enablement, persuasion. Policy categories: communications/marketing, service provision, guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to PA guideline implementation among physicians include knowledge on where to refer or what to say, access to pragmatic programs or resources, and things that influence motivation, such as competing priorities or lack of incentives. Future work will report on the development and evaluation of knowledge translation interventions informed by the barriers.
Guidelines for physical activity exist and following them would improve health. Physicians can advise patients on physical activity. We found barriers related to physicians' knowledge, a lack of tools and of physician incentives, and competing demands for limited time with a patient. We discuss interventions that could reduce these barriers. INTRODUCTION: Uptake of physical activity (PA) guidelines would improve health and reduce mortality in older adults. However, physicians face barriers in guideline implementation, particularly when faced with needing to tailor recommendations in the presence of chronic disease. We performed a behavioral analysis of physician barriers to PA guideline implementation and to identify interventions. The Too Fit To Fracture physical activity recommendations were used as an example of disease-specific PA guidelines. METHODS: Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians and nurse practitioners in Ontario, stratified by type of physician, geographic area, and urban/rural, and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers coded data and identified emerging themes. Using the behavior change wheel framework, themes were categorized into capability, opportunity and motivation, and interventions were identified. RESULTS: Fifty-nine family physicians, specialists, and nurse practitioners participated. Barriers were as follows: Capability-lack of exercise knowledge or where to refer; Opportunity-pragmatic tools, fit within existing workflow, available programs that meet patients' needs, physical activity literacy and cultural practices; Motivation-lack of incentives, not in their scope of practice or professional identity, competing priorities, outcome expectancies. Interventions selected: education, environmental restructuring, enablement, persuasion. Policy categories: communications/marketing, service provision, guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to PA guideline implementation among physicians include knowledge on where to refer or what to say, access to pragmatic programs or resources, and things that influence motivation, such as competing priorities or lack of incentives. Future work will report on the development and evaluation of knowledge translation interventions informed by the barriers.
Authors: L M Giangregorio; A Papaioannou; N J Macintyre; M C Ashe; A Heinonen; K Shipp; J Wark; S McGill; H Keller; R Jain; J Laprade; A M Cheung Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Dafna Merom; Victoria Pye; Rona Macniven; Hidde van der Ploeg; Andrew Milat; Catherine Sherrington; Stephen Lord; Adrian Bauman Journal: Prev Med Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Marjolein Lugtenberg; Jako S Burgers; Casper F Besters; Dolly Han; Gert P Westert Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Fiona Morgan; Alysia Battersby; Alison L Weightman; Lydia Searchfield; Ruth Turley; Helen Morgan; James Jagroo; Simon Ellis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: L Giangregorio; R Clark; C McArthur; A Papaioannou; A M Cheung; J Laprade; L Lee; R Jain Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: C Ziebart; C McArthur; L Lee; A Papaioannou; J Laprade; A M Cheung; R Jain; L Giangregorio Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Natalie A Johnson; Ben Ewald; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Fiona G Stacey; Wendy J Brown; Mark Jones; Elizabeth G Holliday; Erica L James Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Patricia Solomon; Nancy Margaret Salbach; Kelly Kathleen O'Brien; Stephanie Nixon; Larry Baxter; Nicole Gervais Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2019 Jan-Dec