Literature DB >> 24309619

Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states.

Kimon Bekelis1, Symeon Missios2, George Kakoulides3, Redi Rahmani4, Nathan Simmons5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is a persistent trend for more outpatient lumbar discectomies in the United States.
PURPOSE: To investigate the characteristics of the patients selected for ambulatory procedures. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-seven thousand one hundred twenty-five patients who underwent outpatient and 102,592 patients undergoing inpatient lumbar discectomies and were were registered in the State Ambulatory Surgery Database (SASD) and State Inpatient Database (SID), respectively, for New York, California, Florida, and North Carolina from 2005 to 2008. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of outpatient procedures, 30-day readmissions, and hospital charges.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent outpatient and inpatient lumbar discectomies and were registered in SASD and SID, respectively, for New York, California, Florida, and North Carolina from 2005 to 2008. Logistic regression models were used to demonstrate the association of socioeconomic factors with the odds of undergoing an outpatient procedure.
RESULTS: Male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08), private insurance (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.86-2.01), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 3.17-5.16), and higher volume hospitals (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08) were significantly associated with outpatient procedures. Higher income (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.81-0.85), older age (OR, 0.996; 95% CI, 0.995-0.997), coverage by Medicaid (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96), African Americans (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.70), and other minority races were associated with decreased odds of outpatient procedures. The rate of 30-day postoperative readmissions was higher among inpatients. Institutional charges were significantly lower for outpatient lumbar discectomies. The median charge for inpatient surgery was $24,273 as compared with $11,339 for the outpatient setting (p<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Access to ambulatory lumbar discectomies appears to be more common for younger, white, male patients, with private insurance and less comorbidities, in the setting of higher volume hospitals. Further investigation is needed in the direction of mapping these disparities for appropriate resource utilization.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory; Lumbar discectomy; Outpatient surgery center; SASD; SID; Socioeconomic disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24309619     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  17 in total

1.  Spine surgeon ownership of ambulatory surgery centers.

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Mark T Langhans; Sravisht Iyer
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Steven J McAnany
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

3.  Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; R Shay Bess; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-10

4.  Access disparities to Magnet hospitals for patients undergoing neurosurgical operations.

Authors:  Symeon Missios; Kimon Bekelis
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.

Authors:  Jason M Cuellar; Edward Nomoto; Ehsan Saadat; Anthony Ma; Patrick Hill; Michael Kropf; Todd H Lanman; Brian Perri; Khawar Siddique; Willis Wagner; Rajeev Rao; Albert Wong; Michael Eng; Stephen Stephan; Neel Anand; Hyun Bae; Alexandre Rasouli
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 6.  Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Peter B Derman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 7.  Ambulatory surgery center ownership models.

Authors:  Neil Badlani
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

8.  Use of Quantile Regression to Determine the Impact on Total Health Care Costs of Surgical Site Infections Following Common Ambulatory Procedures.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Fang Tian; Anna E Wallace; Katelin B Nickel; David K Warren; Victoria J Fraser; Nandini Selvam; Barton H Hamilton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Cost Comparison of Open and Arthroscopic Treatment Options for SLAP Tears.

Authors:  Lambert T Li; Carlin Chuck; Steven L Bokshan; Steven F DeFroda; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-30

10.  Minimally invasive lumbar decompression in an ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Dil V Patel; Joon S Yoo; Sailee S Karmarkar; Eric H Lamoutte; Kern Singh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.