Literature DB >> 1552312

Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain: the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli.

D M Gooler1, A S Feng.   

Abstract

1. Single-unit recordings were made in the auditory midbrain, the torus semicircularis (TS) of the northern leopard frog, to independently characterize the processing of different temporal attributes (signal duration, rise-fall time, and rate of amplitude modulation) of natural sounds and to investigate how these temporal variables interact to produce the observed responses to complex amplitude-modulated (AM) signals. Response functions, on the basis of mean spike count, were derived and categorized to describe the unit's temporal response characteristics to each of the variables. 2. To characterize the duration response functions, tone bursts of different durations (stimuli repeated at a constant repetition rate) at the unit's characteristic frequency (CF) and 10 dB above minimum threshold at CF (MT) were presented monaurally to the contralateral ear. The duration response function of a TS neuron was often related to the temporal discharge characteristics of the neuron. Increases in stimulus duration elicited an increase in spike counts (therefore, long-pass response function) from most neurons (74%) in the TS; 91% of these neurons showed tonic discharge patterns. Phasic-burst (PB) cells that were rapidly adapting showed long-pass duration response functions that were highly nonlinear, having peaks and notches embedded within the functions. On the other hand, one-third of phasic neurons tended to be insensitive to stimulus duration, giving similar spike counts in response to stimuli of greatly different durations (i.e., all pass). In the TS, some neurons (9%) only responded to a limited range of durations (i.e., band-duration pass), and still others showed a preference for shorter durations (9%; i.e., short pass); these were exhibited primarily by phasic and PB neurons. 3. To characterize the rise-fall time response functions, tone bursts having different rise-fall times were presented. The rise-fall time response functions of TS neurons had two distinct characteristics. The majority of tonic cells (91%), as well as some PB (38%) and phasic (29%) neurons, gave essentially invariant spike counts for all stimulus rise-fall times (i.e., all pass; 73% of neurons). Despite the relatively stable spike counts of neurons showing all-pass functions, the peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) deriving from responses to slower rise-fall time stimuli exhibited a longer and somewhat more variable onset latency. About one-fourth (27%) of TS neurons, mostly phasic and PB neurons, showed higher spike counts for signals with rapid rise-fall times.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1552312     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.67.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  44 in total

1.  Corticofugal modulation of duration-tuned neurons in the midbrain auditory nucleus in bats.

Authors:  X Ma; N Suga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The influence of stimulus duration on the delay tuning of cortical neurons in the FM bat, Myotis lucifugus.

Authors:  H Tanaka; D Wong; I Taniguchi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing.

Authors:  Walter Wilczynski; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Level-tolerant duration selectivity in the auditory cortex of the velvety free-tailed bat Molossus molossus.

Authors:  Silvio Macías; Annette Hernández-Abad; Julio C Hechavarría; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to SAM tones located in inhibitory response areas.

Authors:  Hongzhe Li; Jennifer H Sabes; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Temporally selective processing of communication signals by auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Phase sensitivity in bat sonar revisited.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Postmetamorphic changes in auditory sensitivity of the bullfrog midbrain.

Authors:  S S Boatright-Horowitz; A M Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Cerebellar Purkinje cells control eye movements with a rapid rate code that is invariant to spike irregularity.

Authors:  Hannah L Payne; Ranran L French; Christine C Guo; Td Barbara Nguyen-Vu; Tiina Manninen; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity as a Mechanism for Sensory Timing.

Authors:  Helen Motanis; Michael J Seay; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.