BACKGROUND: To explore the origin of Propionibacterium in surgical wounds and to suggest an optimized strategy for culturing this organism at the time of revision surgery, we studied the presence of this organism on the skin and in the surgical wounds of patients who underwent revision arthroplasty for reasons other than apparent infection. METHODS: Specimens were cultured in broth and on aerobic and anaerobic media. The presence and degree of positivity of Propionibacterium cultures were correlated with sex. The results of dermal and deep cultures were correlated. Times to positivity and the yields of each media type and specimen source were investigated. RESULTS: Propionibacterium grew in twenty-three of thirty cultures of specimens obtained preoperatively from the unprepared epidermis over the area where a skin incision was going to be made for a shoulder arthroplasty; males had a greater average degree of positivity than females (p < 0.002). Twelve of twenty-one male subjects and zero of twenty female subjects who had cultures of dermal specimens obtained during revision shoulder arthroplasty had positive findings for Propionibacterium (p = 0.0001). Twelve of twenty male subjects and only one of twenty female subjects had positive deep cultures (p = 0.0004). The positivity of dermal cultures for Propionibacterium was significantly associated with the positivity of deep cultures for this organism (p = 0.0001). If Propionibacterium was present in deep tissues, it was likely that it would be recovered by culture if four different specimens were obtained and cultured for a minimum of seventeen days on three different media: aerobic, anaerobic, and broth. CONCLUSIONS: Because the surgical incision of dermal sebaceous glands may be a source of Propionibacterium in deep wounds, strategies for minimizing the risk of Propionibacterium infections may need to be directed at minimizing the contamination of surgical wounds from these bacteria residing in rather than on the skin. Obtaining at least four specimens, observing them for seventeen days, and using three types of culture media optimize the recovery of Propionibacterium at the time of revision surgery.
BACKGROUND: To explore the origin of Propionibacterium in surgical wounds and to suggest an optimized strategy for culturing this organism at the time of revision surgery, we studied the presence of this organism on the skin and in the surgical wounds of patients who underwent revision arthroplasty for reasons other than apparent infection. METHODS: Specimens were cultured in broth and on aerobic and anaerobic media. The presence and degree of positivity of Propionibacterium cultures were correlated with sex. The results of dermal and deep cultures were correlated. Times to positivity and the yields of each media type and specimen source were investigated. RESULTS: Propionibacterium grew in twenty-three of thirty cultures of specimens obtained preoperatively from the unprepared epidermis over the area where a skin incision was going to be made for a shoulder arthroplasty; males had a greater average degree of positivity than females (p < 0.002). Twelve of twenty-one male subjects and zero of twenty female subjects who had cultures of dermal specimens obtained during revision shoulder arthroplasty had positive findings for Propionibacterium (p = 0.0001). Twelve of twenty male subjects and only one of twenty female subjects had positive deep cultures (p = 0.0004). The positivity of dermal cultures for Propionibacterium was significantly associated with the positivity of deep cultures for this organism (p = 0.0001). If Propionibacterium was present in deep tissues, it was likely that it would be recovered by culture if four different specimens were obtained and cultured for a minimum of seventeen days on three different media: aerobic, anaerobic, and broth. CONCLUSIONS: Because the surgical incision of dermal sebaceous glands may be a source of Propionibacterium in deep wounds, strategies for minimizing the risk of Propionibacterium infections may need to be directed at minimizing the contamination of surgical wounds from these bacteria residing in rather than on the skin. Obtaining at least four specimens, observing them for seventeen days, and using three types of culture media optimize the recovery of Propionibacterium at the time of revision surgery.
Authors: Mauricio F Herrera; Greg Bauer; Fletcher Reynolds; Richard M Wilk; Louis U Bigliani; William N Levine Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: José Beguiristain; Javier del Río; Julio Duart; José Barroso; Alvaro Silva; Carlos Villas Journal: J Pediatr Orthop B Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Samer S Hasan; Jordan M Leith; Barry Campbell; Ranjit Kapil; Kevin L Smith; Frederick A Matsen Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Andrew McDowell; Susanna Valanne; Gordon Ramage; Michael M Tunney; Josephine V Glenn; Gregory C McLorinan; Ajay Bhatia; Jean-Francois Maisonneuve; Michael Lodes; David H Persing; Sheila Patrick Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: M M Tunney; S Patrick; M D Curran; G Ramage; D Hanna; J R Nixon; S P Gorman; R I Davis; N Anderson Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Leo Pauzenberger; Annemarie Grieb; Michael Hexel; Brenda Laky; Werner Anderl; Philipp Heuberer Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.342