Anh N Tran1, Albert Lai, Sichen Li, Whitney B Pope, Stephanie Teixeira, Robert J Harris, Davis C Woodworth, Phioanh L Nghiemphu, Timothy F Cloughesy, Benjamin M Ellingson. 1. Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore (A.N.T.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.T., W.B.P., S.T., R.J.H., D.C.W., P.L.N., B.M.E.); Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (A.N.T., A.L., S.L., P.L.N., T.F.C.); Department of Biomedical Physics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (R.J.H., D.C.W., B.M.E.); Department of Bioengineering, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have been linked to favorable outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Recent in vitro experiments suggest that IDH1 mutation sensitizes tumors to radiation damage. We hypothesized that radiographic treatment response would be significantly different between IDH1 mutant versus wild-type GBMs after radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS: A total of 39 newly diagnosed GBM patients with known IDH1 mutational status (10 IDH1 mutants), who followed standard therapy and had regular post-contrast T1W (T1+C) and T2W/ fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images in the 6-month period after starting RT, were enrolled. The volume of contrast-enhancing and FLAIR hyperintensity were calculated from each scan. Linear and polynomial regression techniques were used to estimate the rate of change and temporal patterns in tumor volumes. RESULTS: IDH1 mutant GBMs demonstrated a favorable response to RT/TMZ in the study period, as demonstrated by 10 of 10 mutants showing radiographic response (decreasing V(T1+C)), compared with 13 of 29 wild-types (P < .001). During the study period, V(T1+C) and V(FLAIR) changed at -3.6% per week and +0.6% per week in IDH1 mutant tumors, respectively, as compared with +0.8% per week and +5.2% per week in IDH1 wild-type tumors (P = .0076 and P = .0118, respectively). Amongst the radiographic responders, IDH1 mutant GBMs still demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefit. Aggregated tumor kinetics by group showed significant lower rate in IDH1 mutant GBMs in specific periods: >105 days for V(FLAIR) and 95-120 and >150 days for V(T1+C) from starting RT/TMZ. CONCLUSIONS: The current study supports the hypothesis that IDH1 mutant GBMs are more sensitive to radiochemotherapy than IDH1 wild-type GBMs.
BACKGROUND:Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have been linked to favorable outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Recent in vitro experiments suggest that IDH1 mutation sensitizes tumors to radiation damage. We hypothesized that radiographic treatment response would be significantly different between IDH1 mutant versus wild-type GBMs after radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS: A total of 39 newly diagnosed GBMpatients with known IDH1 mutational status (10 IDH1 mutants), who followed standard therapy and had regular post-contrast T1W (T1+C) and T2W/ fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images in the 6-month period after starting RT, were enrolled. The volume of contrast-enhancing and FLAIR hyperintensity were calculated from each scan. Linear and polynomial regression techniques were used to estimate the rate of change and temporal patterns in tumor volumes. RESULTS:IDH1 mutant GBMs demonstrated a favorable response to RT/TMZ in the study period, as demonstrated by 10 of 10 mutants showing radiographic response (decreasing V(T1+C)), compared with 13 of 29 wild-types (P < .001). During the study period, V(T1+C) and V(FLAIR) changed at -3.6% per week and +0.6% per week in IDH1 mutant tumors, respectively, as compared with +0.8% per week and +5.2% per week in IDH1 wild-type tumors (P = .0076 and P = .0118, respectively). Amongst the radiographic responders, IDH1 mutant GBMs still demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefit. Aggregated tumor kinetics by group showed significant lower rate in IDH1 mutant GBMs in specific periods: >105 days for V(FLAIR) and 95-120 and >150 days for V(T1+C) from starting RT/TMZ. CONCLUSIONS: The current study supports the hypothesis that IDH1 mutant GBMs are more sensitive to radiochemotherapy than IDH1 wild-type GBMs.
Authors: B M Ellingson; A Lai; R J Harris; J M Selfridge; W H Yong; K Das; W B Pope; P L Nghiemphu; H V Vinters; L M Liau; P S Mischel; T F Cloughesy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Albert Lai; Anh Tran; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Whitney B Pope; Orestes E Solis; Michael Selch; Emese Filka; William H Yong; Paul S Mischel; Linda M Liau; Surasak Phuphanich; Keith Black; Scott Peak; Richard M Green; Cynthia E Spier; Tatjana Kolevska; Jonathan Polikoff; Louis Fehrenbacher; Robert Elashoff; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Albert Lai; Samir Kharbanda; Whitney B Pope; Anh Tran; Orestes E Solis; Franklin Peale; William F Forrest; Kanan Pujara; Jose A Carrillo; Ajay Pandita; Benjamin M Ellingson; Chauncey W Bowers; Robert H Soriano; Nils O Schmidt; Sankar Mohan; William H Yong; Somasekar Seshagiri; Zora Modrusan; Zhaoshi Jiang; Kenneth D Aldape; Paul S Mischel; Linda M Liau; Cameron J Escovedo; Weidong Chen; Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu; C David James; Michael D Prados; Manfred Westphal; Katrin Lamszus; Timothy Cloughesy; Heidi S Phillips Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shadi Lalezari; Arthur P Chou; Anh Tran; Orestes E Solis; Negar Khanlou; Weidong Chen; Sichen Li; Jose A Carrillo; Reshmi Chowdhury; Julia Selfridge; Desiree E Sanchez; Ryan W Wilson; Mira Zurayk; Jonathan Lalezari; Jerry J Lou; Laurel Ormiston; Karen Ancheta; Robert Hanna; Paul Miller; David Piccioni; Benjamin M Ellingson; Colin Buchanan; Paul S Mischel; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Richard Green; He-Jing Wang; Whitney B Pope; Linda M Liau; Robert M Elashoff; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong; Albert Lai Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Talia C Oughourlian; Jingwen Yao; Jacob Schlossman; Catalina Raymond; Matthew Ji; Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Noriko Salamon; Whitney B Pope; Johannes Czernin; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Corbin A Rayfield; Fillan Grady; Gustavo De Leon; Russell Rockne; Eduardo Carrasco; Pamela Jackson; Mayur Vora; Sandra K Johnston; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Kamala R Clark-Swanson; Scott Whitmire; Mauricio E Gamez; Alyx Porter; Leland Hu; Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar; Bernard Bendok; Sujay Vora; Kristin R Swanson Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2018-12
Authors: Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Akifumi Hagiwara; Hiroyuki Uetani; Jingwen Yao; Talia C Oughourlian; Shadfar Bahri; Chencai Wang; Catalina Raymond; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Whitney B Pope; Noriko Salamon; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ovidiu C Andronesi; Franziska Loebel; Wolfgang Bogner; Małgorzata Marjańska; Matthew G Vander Heiden; A John Iafrate; Jorg Dietrich; Tracy T Batchelor; Elizabeth R Gerstner; William G Kaelin; Andrew S Chi; Bruce R Rosen; Daniel P Cahill Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 12.531