Literature DB >> 24304901

GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors.

Vignir Isberg1, Bas Vroling, Rob van der Kant, Kang Li, Gert Vriend, David Gloriam.   

Abstract

For the past 20 years, the GPCRDB (G protein-coupled receptors database; http://www.gpcr.org/7tm/) has been a 'one-stop shop' for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-related data. The GPCRDB contains experimental data on sequences, ligand-binding constants, mutations and oligomers, as well as many different types of computationally derived data, such as multiple sequence alignments and homology models. The GPCRDB also provides visualization and analysis tools, plus a number of query systems. In the latest GPCRDB release, all multiple sequence alignments, and >65,000 homology models, have been significantly improved, thanks to a recent flurry of GPCR X-ray structure data. Tools were introduced to browse X-ray structures, compare binding sites, profile similar receptors and generate amino acid conservation statistics. Snake plots and helix box diagrams can now be custom coloured (e.g. by chemical properties or mutation data) and saved as figures. A series of sequence alignment visualization tools has been added, and sequence alignments can now be created for subsets of sequences and sequence positions, and alignment statistics can be produced for any of these subsets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24304901      PMCID: PMC3965068          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a large family of cell surface receptors. They regulate a wide range of cellular processes, including those associated with taste, smell and vision, and they control myriad intracellular systems, ranging from neurotransmission to hormone signalling. GPCRs are major targets for the pharmaceutical industry, as reflected by the fact that more than a quarter of all FDA-approved drugs act on a GPCR (1). At present, only ∼30 of the ∼350 genes that code for non-olfactory receptors in the human species (2) are truly validated therapeutic targets (3), indicating this family’s immense potential for future drug development. An increasing number of drugs have been found to display polypharmacology, i.e. activity through multiple receptor targets (4). However, endogenous ligands for ∼135 of the so-called orphan receptors have so far eluded researchers. Early releases of the GPCRDB (5–8) focused on the compilation and homogeneous presentation of many types of heterogeneous data, with the aim of providing the four main facilities needed in an information system: browsing, querying, retrieval and inference. The first three of these facilities have been available ever since the start of the project, but received a major boost when the GPCRDB was coupled to an intelligent PDF reader (9) that puts all relevant aspects of the GPCRDB non-intrusively in a side-bar in the PDF reader window. Inference really only started when a number of interactive tools were added (10), enabling bioinformaticians to interact with multiple sequence alignments, together with derived data such as entropy and variability scores, in an integrated environment. For example, these tools were successfully applied in the 2010 GPCR-Dock competition (11). In the past, computing facilities were aimed at expert GPCR bioinformaticians. In contrast, the new interactive tools are readily accessible to non-expert users and allow faster execution of visualization and analysis tasks.

STRUCTURAL DATA AND TOOLS

Crystal structure browser

In recent years, X-ray crystallography of GPCRs has revealed the sites and mechanisms for binding ligands, lipids, and G proteins, as well as the conformations of activated states. The GPCRDB structure browser includes manually annotated key data for all ligand–receptor complexes and at least one (the highest resolution) representative file for receptors solved only as apo structures. The structure browser can select crystal structures based on a series of filters for receptors, ligands, activation states, G protein presence, PDB and Pubmed identifiers, resolution, structure completeness and so forth. Sequence similarities can be retrieved by specifying a receptor reference, facilitating template selection for homology modelling.

Structure-based sequence alignments and homology models

GPCR transmembrane (TM) helices are known to contain many irregularities. However, it was only recently realized, with the availability of new crystallographic data, that GPCRs contain many more α-bulges than those in helix II and helix V. The α-bulges in GPCRs are relatively non-conserved. As an example of this non-conservation, Figure 1 shows the α-bulges in helix V of rhodopsin and the adenosine 2A receptor, and Figure 2 shows the alignment of the middle part of helix II in 60 trace amine receptors. The receptors are on average 70% sequence identical, but the bulge is only present in around half of all family members.
Figure 1.

The area around the bulge in helix V. The S1P lipid receptor [red, PDBid = 3v2y (12)] does not have α-bulges in helix V and is provided as a reference. Rhodopsin [green, PDBid = 1f88 (13)] and the adenosine-2A receptor [purple, PDBid = 3eml (14)] have an α-bulge (red arrow) between positions 5165.46 and 5175.47. The adenosine-2A receptor has an extra bulge (blue arrow) between positions 5115.41 and 5125.42. Rhodopsin and the adenosine-2A receptor have a proline at position 5205.50. The S1P lipid receptor, which does not have bulges in helix V, does not have a proline at position 5205.50. Time will tell whether this correlation is accidental or causal. Residues are numbered using the GPCRDB scheme with the B&W numbers given as superscripts.

Figure 2.

Alignment of the middle part of TM helix II in 60 trace amine receptors. The residues 2272.57–2332.63 (GPCRDB numbers with B&W numbers as superscripts) are shown running vertically using the GPCRDB numbering scheme.

The area around the bulge in helix V. The S1P lipid receptor [red, PDBid = 3v2y (12)] does not have α-bulges in helix V and is provided as a reference. Rhodopsin [green, PDBid = 1f88 (13)] and the adenosine-2A receptor [purple, PDBid = 3eml (14)] have an α-bulge (red arrow) between positions 5165.46 and 5175.47. The adenosine-2A receptor has an extra bulge (blue arrow) between positions 5115.41 and 5125.42. Rhodopsin and the adenosine-2A receptor have a proline at position 5205.50. The S1P lipid receptor, which does not have bulges in helix V, does not have a proline at position 5205.50. Time will tell whether this correlation is accidental or causal. Residues are numbered using the GPCRDB scheme with the B&W numbers given as superscripts. Alignment of the middle part of TM helix II in 60 trace amine receptors. The residues 2272.57–2332.63 (GPCRDB numbers with B&W numbers as superscripts) are shown running vertically using the GPCRDB numbering scheme. The abundance of α-bulges required a novel residue numbering approach that involved rewriting the DSSP secondary structure analysis software (15) and the GPCR-specific alignment software. This, in turn, meant that >65 000 homology models had to be constructed again. All GPCR sequences are now modelled twice-once using as template the most sequence-similar inactive form, and once using the most similar active form. Modelling was done with YASARA (16), aligning the model with the template contained in the GPCRDB and using default values for all other parameters and options. All GPCR alignment profiles were manually updated to reflect our latest knowledge about the α-bulges, and all 1272 alignments were regenerated. It seems likely that this exercise will need to be repeated in the coming years as new GPCR structure data reveal new α-bulge patterns.

Translation of generic and receptor-specific residue numbers

We wanted to take proper care of the α-bulges that are widely present in six of the seven GPCR TM helices without excessively changing the commonly used generic residue numbering schemes. The Oliveira numbering (17) and the B&W numbers (18) were maintained as far as possible, whereas bulge residues were given the same number as the residue directly N-terminal in the sequence but with a digit added that reflects the number of the bulge. The Utopia-GPCRDB PDF reader automatically takes these new numbers into account, whereas our new sequence indexing tool provides computational access to all generic and receptor-specific residue numbers for selected receptors.

RECEPTOR SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS

Snake-like and helix box diagrams

Snake-like diagrams now include the full loops and terminal sequences (Figure 3A). New helix box diagrams present the TM helices as seen from ‘above’ (Figure 3A). These diagrams are similar to previously used helical wheel plots but orient the amino acids in better agreement with the 3D structures. Hovering the computer mouse pointer over the TM amino acids displays their residue numbers. Amino acids can be coloured to illustrate their physicochemical properties, or the presence of mutation data or the mutation effects. The diagrams can be downloaded as picture files or in scalable vector graphics format to allow further editing.
Figure 3.

Snake-like (A) and helix box (B) diagrams depict GPCRs from the side and top, respectively.

Snake-like (A) and helix box (B) diagrams depict GPCRs from the side and top, respectively.

Residue conservation and property statistics

In functional or evolutionary studies of specific amino acids or their properties, it is typically relevant to find out which additional receptors share the conserved amino acids or properties (e.g. specific charge or hydrophobicity). Therefore, sequence alignments are augmented with a series of statistics. For each position, the following data are listed: the consensus sequence, the percentage of each of the 20 amino acids present, and percentages for relevant properties such as aromaticity, acidity or hydrogen bonding capability.

(BINDING) SITE-SPECIFIC RECEPTOR SIMILARITIES

Alignment sub-site/domain selections

The alignment and similarity tools integrated into GPCRDB offer users the ability to select arbitrary combinations of helices, residue positions or predefined sets of residues, for example, the amino acids in the TM binding cavity (19). By focusing on a given functional site rather than the full sequence, the receptor similarities will better reflect the structural features involved in, for example, receptor dimerization, ligand binding or G protein binding.

Similarity search with a reference receptor (one-to-all similarities)

Similarity searches are conducted by specifying a target of interest, a set of receptors and the residue positions of interest. Results are presented as a sequence alignment, in which the target is followed by a list of hits in order of sequence identity, similarity or alignment score. The data can be downloaded as either an alignment file or a spreadsheet.

Trees (all-to-all similarities)

Neighbour-joining trees (20) can be generated based on any sub-site/domain and set of receptors. Trees can be calculated with up to 100 bootstraps, displayed in circular and ladder representations, and downloaded in Newick format for use with stand-alone tree software.

Sequence motif search (conserved and non-conserved separation)

The sequence motif search tool generates more precise and discriminative results, by allowing residues to be matched for relevant amino acid properties (21), e.g. their hydrophobicity, hydrogen bond donor capability or size. Relevant applications for this tool include rationalization of observed polypharmacology, receptor panel selection for off target screening and ligand inference from old to new targets.

CONCLUSIONS

The 20th yearly release of the GPCRDB includes a large number of novel discoveries. The solved structures (see http://gpcr.scripps.edu/) reveal the presence of many α-bulges that are not conserved among or even within GPCR subfamilies. We have updated all the alignments and homology models, together with the residue numbering schemes, to ensure agreement between the contents of the GPCRDB and new insights obtained by studying all the available structure data. Additionally, the new GPCRDB release includes a powerful yet user-friendly computational toolbox that provides users with crystal structure browser, receptor visualization and alignment analysis tools, plus options to study receptor similarity both quantitatively and graphically.

FUNDING

Lundbeck Foundation [R54-A5441 to V.I.]; the Carlsberg Foundation [R77-A6854 to D.G.] and the European Union NewProt project [289350 to G.V.]. Funding for open access charge: The publication will be paid by the CMBI running costs. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
  18 in total

1.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  K Palczewski; T Kumasaka; T Hori; C A Behnke; H Motoshima; B A Fox; I Le Trong; D C Teller; T Okada; R E Stenkamp; M Yamamoto; M Miyano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  GPCRDB information system for G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Florence Horn; Emmanuel Bettler; Laerte Oliveira; Fabien Campagne; Fred E Cohen; Gerrit Vriend
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Drug design strategies for targeting G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Thomas Klabunde; Gerhard Hessler
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 4.  How many drug targets are there?

Authors:  John P Overington; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Homology modeling.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Sander B Nabuurs; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Methods Biochem Anal       Date:  2003

6.  Definition of the G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane bundle binding pocket and calculation of receptor similarities for drug design.

Authors:  David E Gloriam; Steven M Foord; Frank E Blaney; Stephen L Garland
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  F Horn; J Weare; M W Beukers; S Hörsch; A Bairoch; W Chen; O Edvardsen; F Campagne; G Vriend
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands.

Authors:  Anthony P Davenport; Stephen P H Alexander; Joanna L Sharman; Adam J Pawson; Helen E Benson; Amy E Monaghan; Wen Chiy Liew; Chidochangu P Mpamhanga; Tom I Bonner; Richard R Neubig; Jean Philippe Pin; Michael Spedding; Anthony J Harmar
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 25.468

9.  The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Jaakola; Mark T Griffith; Michael A Hanson; Vadim Cherezov; Ellen Y T Chien; J Robert Lane; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  GPCRDB: information system for G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Bas Vroling; Marijn Sanders; Coos Baakman; Annika Borrmann; Stefan Verhoeven; Jan Klomp; Laerte Oliveira; Jacob de Vlieg; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  38 in total

1.  SeQuery: an interactive graph database for visualizing the GPCR superfamily.

Authors:  Geng-Ming Hu; M K Secario; Chi-Ming Chen
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  G protein-coupled receptors: the evolution of structural insight.

Authors:  Samantha B Gacasan; Daniel L Baker; Abby L Parrill
Journal:  AIMS Biophys       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 3.  Protein Bioinformatics Databases and Resources.

Authors:  Chuming Chen; Hongzhan Huang; Cathy H Wu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

4.  Principal component analysis of binding energies for single-point mutants of hT2R16 bound to an agonist correlate with experimental mutant cell response.

Authors:  Derek E Chen; Darryl L Willick; Joseph B Ruckel; Wely B Floriano
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 5.  Protease-activated receptors in hemostasis.

Authors:  Marvin T Nieman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Substitution scoring matrices for proteins - An overview.

Authors:  Rakesh Trivedi; Hampapathalu Adimurthy Nagarajaram
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  WDL-RF: predicting bioactivities of ligand molecules acting with G protein-coupled receptors by combining weighted deep learning and random forest.

Authors:  Jiansheng Wu; Qiuming Zhang; Weijian Wu; Tao Pang; Haifeng Hu; Wallace K B Chan; Xiaoyan Ke; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Common variants in the human platelet PAR4 thrombin receptor alter platelet function and differ by race.

Authors:  Leonard C Edelstein; Lukas M Simon; Cory R Lindsay; Xianguo Kong; Raúl Teruel-Montoya; Benjamin E Tourdot; Edward S Chen; Lin Ma; Shaun Coughlin; Marvin Nieman; Michael Holinstat; Chad A Shaw; Paul F Bray
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Structure and ligand-binding mechanism of the human OX1 and OX2 orexin receptors.

Authors:  Jie Yin; Kerim Babaoglu; Chad A Brautigam; Lindsay Clark; Zhenhua Shao; Thomas H Scheuermann; Charles M Harrell; Anthony L Gotter; Anthony J Roecker; Christopher J Winrow; John J Renger; Paul J Coleman; Daniel M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  The pre-vertebrate origins of neurogenic placodes.

Authors:  Philip Barron Abitua; T Blair Gainous; Angela N Kaczmarczyk; Christopher J Winchell; Clare Hudson; Kaori Kamata; Masashi Nakagawa; Motoyuki Tsuda; Takehiro G Kusakabe; Michael Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.