Literature DB >> 24304220

A comprehensive laboratory-based program for classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer genes.

J M Eggington1, K R Bowles, K Moyes, S Manley, L Esterling, S Sizemore, E Rosenthal, A Theisen, J Saam, C Arnell, D Pruss, J Bennett, L A Burbidge, B Roa, R J Wenstrup.   

Abstract

Genetic testing has the potential to guide the prevention and treatment of disease in a variety of settings, and recent technical advances have greatly increased our ability to acquire large amounts of genetic data. The interpretation of this data remains challenging, as the clinical significance of genetic variation detected in the laboratory is not always clear. Although regulatory agencies and professional societies provide some guidance regarding the classification, reporting, and long-term follow-up of variants, few protocols for the implementation of these guidelines have been described. Because the primary aim of clinical testing is to provide results to inform medical management, a variant classification program that offers timely, accurate, confident and cost-effective interpretation of variants should be an integral component of the laboratory process. Here we describe the components of our laboratory's current variant classification program (VCP), based on 20 years of experience and over one million samples tested, using the BRCA1/2 genes as a model. Our VCP has lowered the percentage of tests in which one or more BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are detected to 2.1% in the absence of a pathogenic mutation, demonstrating how the coordinated application of resources toward classification and reclassification significantly impacts the clinical utility of testing.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; HBOC; VUS; co-segregation; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; variant classification; variants of uncertain significance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24304220     DOI: 10.1111/cge.12315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  70 in total

1.  Tumor BRCA1 Reversion Mutation Arising during Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Is Associated with Therapy Resistance.

Authors:  Anosheh Afghahi; Kirsten M Timms; Shaveta Vinayak; Kristin C Jensen; Allison W Kurian; Robert W Carlson; Pei-Jen Chang; Elizabeth Schackmann; Anne-Renee Hartman; James M Ford; Melinda L Telli
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Authors:  D M Eccles; G Mitchell; A N A Monteiro; R Schmutzler; F J Couch; A B Spurdle; E B Gómez-García
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Health Care Segregation, Physician Recommendation, and Racial Disparities in BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Susan M Domchek; Peter W Groeneveld; Younji Kim; U Nkiru Motanya; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.

Authors:  Charité Ricker; Julie O Culver; Katrina Lowstuter; Duveen Sturgeon; Julia D Sturgeon; Christopher R Chanock; William J Gauderman; Kevin J McDonnell; Gregory E Idos; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-01-12

5.  Current condition of genetic medicine for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroko Terui-Kohbata; Masayuki Yoshida
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12

6.  Clinical Variant Classification: A Comparison of Public Databases and a Commercial Testing Laboratory.

Authors:  William Gradishar; KariAnne Johnson; Krystal Brown; Erin Mundt; Susan Manley
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-13

7.  Prevalence and characteristics of likely-somatic variants in cancer susceptibility genes among individuals who had hereditary pan-cancer panel testing.

Authors:  Thomas P Slavin; Bradford Coffee; Ryan Bernhisel; Jennifer Logan; Hannah C Cox; Guido Marcucci; Jeffrey Weitzel; Susan L Neuhausen; Debora Mancini-DiNardo
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2019-04-13

8.  Clinical Challenges Associated with Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Kari L Ring; Molly Daniels; Bryan M Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-12-13

9.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melinda L Telli; Kirsten M Timms; Julia Reid; Bryan Hennessy; Gordon B Mills; Kristin C Jensen; Zoltan Szallasi; William T Barry; Eric P Winer; Nadine M Tung; Steven J Isakoff; Paula D Ryan; April Greene-Colozzi; Alexander Gutin; Zaina Sangale; Diana Iliev; Chris Neff; Victor Abkevich; Joshua T Jones; Jerry S Lanchbury; Anne-Renee Hartman; Judy E Garber; James M Ford; Daniel P Silver; Andrea L Richardson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Germline multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing in an unselected endometrial cancer cohort.

Authors:  Kari L Ring; Amanda S Bruegl; Brian A Allen; Eric P Elkin; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Molly S Daniels; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.