Literature DB >> 24303978

Cerebellar continuous theta-burst stimulation affects motor learning of voluntary arm movements in humans.

Pietro Li Voti1, Antonella Conte, Lorenzo Rocchi, Matteo Bologna, Nashaba Khan, Giorgio Leodori, Alfredo Berardelli.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated in healthy subjects whether continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) over the lateral cerebellum alters motor practice and retention phases during ipsilateral index finger and arm reaching movements. In 12 healthy subjects we delivered cTBS before repeated index finger abductions or arm reaching movements differing in complexity (reaching-to-grasp and reaching-to-point). We evaluated kinematic variables for index finger and arm reaching movements and changes in primary motor cortex (M1) activity tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Peak acceleration increased during motor practice for index finger abductions and reaching-to-grasp movements and persisted during motor retention. Peak acceleration decreased during motor practice for reaching-to-point movements and the decrease remained during motor retention. Cerebellar cTBS left the changes in peak acceleration during motor practice for index finger abductions and reaching-to-grasp arm movements unchanged but reduced peak acceleration at motor retention. Cerebellar cTBS prevented the decrease in peak acceleration for reaching-to-point movements during motor practice and at motor retention. Index finger abductions and arm reaching movements increased M1 excitability. Cerebellar cTBS decreased the motor evoked potential (MEP) facilitation induced by index finger movements, but increased the MEP facilitation after reaching-to-grasp and reaching-to-point movements. Cerebellar stimulation prevents motor retention for index finger abductions, reaching-to-grasp and reaching-to-point movements and degrades motor practice only for reaching-to-point movements. Cerebellar cTBS alters practice-related changes in M1 excitability depending on how intensely the cerebellum contributes to the task. Changes in M1 excitability reflect mechanisms of homeostatic plasticity elicited by the interaction of an 'exogenous' (cTBS-induced) and an 'endogenous' (motor practice-induced) plasticity-inducing protocol.
© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellum; continuous theta burst stimulation; cortical plasticity; motor learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24303978     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  16 in total

1.  Reply: A single session of cerebellar theta burst stimulation does not alter writing performance in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Sabine Meunier; Traian Popa; Cécile Hubsch; Emmanuel Roze; Asha Kishore
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Taking the brakes off the learning curve.

Authors:  Freja Gheysen; Gabriel Lasne; Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac; Genevieve Albouy; Sabine Meunier; Habib Benali; Julien Doyon; Traian Popa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Both 50 and 30 Hz continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation depresses the cerebellum.

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Aaron D Chau; Liu Shi Gan; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation in essential tremor.

Authors:  Matteo Bologna; Lorenzo Rocchi; Giorgio Leodori; Giulia Paparella; Antonella Conte; Nashaba Kahn; Giovanni Fabbrini; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Effects of cerebellar theta-burst stimulation on arm and neck movement kinematics in patients with focal dystonia.

Authors:  Matteo Bologna; Giulia Paparella; Andrea Fabbrini; Giorgio Leodori; Lorenzo Rocchi; Mark Hallett; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Two distinct interneuron circuits in human motor cortex are linked to different subsets of physiological and behavioral plasticity.

Authors:  Masashi Hamada; Joseph M Galea; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Paolo Mazzone; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  A systematic review of non-motor rTMS induced motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Grégory Nordmann; Valeriya Azorina; Berthold Langguth; Martin Schecklmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Understanding the link between somatosensory temporal discrimination and movement execution in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Antonella Conte; Daniele Belvisi; Nicoletta Manzo; Matteo Bologna; Francesca Barone; Matteo Tartaglia; Neeraj Upadhyay; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.