Matteo Bologna1, Giulia Paparella2, Andrea Fabbrini2, Giorgio Leodori2, Lorenzo Rocchi2, Mark Hallett3, Alfredo Berardelli4. 1. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Neuromed Institute IRCCS, Pozzilli (IS), Italy. 2. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 3. Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke - NINDS, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Neuromed Institute IRCCS, Pozzilli (IS), Italy. Electronic address: alfredo.berardelli@uniroma1.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cerebellar inhibitory influence on the primary motor cortex in patients with focal dystonia using a cerebellar continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol (cTBS) and to evaluate any relationship with movement abnormalities. METHODS: Thirteen patients with focal hand dystonia, 13 patients with cervical dystonia and 13 healthy subjects underwent two sessions: (i) cTBS over the cerebellar hemisphere (real cTBS) and (ii) cTBS over the neck muscles (sham cTBS). The effects of cerebellar cTBS were quantified as excitability changes in the contralateral primary motor cortex, as well as possible changes in arm and neck movements in patients. RESULTS: Real cerebellar cTBS reduced the excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex in healthy subjects and in patients with cervical dystonia, though not in patients with focal hand dystonia. There was no correlation between changes in primary motor cortex excitability and arm and neck movement kinematics in patients. There were no changes in clinical scores or in kinematic measures, after either real or sham cerebellar cTBS in patients. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced cerebellar inhibitory modulation of primary motor cortex excitability in focal dystonia may be related to the body areas affected by dystonia as opposed to being a widespread pathophysiological abnormality. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study yields information on the differential role played by the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of different focal dystonias.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cerebellar inhibitory influence on the primary motor cortex in patients with focal dystonia using a cerebellar continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol (cTBS) and to evaluate any relationship with movement abnormalities. METHODS: Thirteen patients with focal hand dystonia, 13 patients with cervical dystonia and 13 healthy subjects underwent two sessions: (i) cTBS over the cerebellar hemisphere (real cTBS) and (ii) cTBS over the neck muscles (sham cTBS). The effects of cerebellar cTBS were quantified as excitability changes in the contralateral primary motor cortex, as well as possible changes in arm and neck movements in patients. RESULTS: Real cerebellar cTBS reduced the excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex in healthy subjects and in patients with cervical dystonia, though not in patients with focal hand dystonia. There was no correlation between changes in primary motor cortex excitability and arm and neck movement kinematics in patients. There were no changes in clinical scores or in kinematic measures, after either real or sham cerebellar cTBS in patients. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced cerebellar inhibitory modulation of primary motor cortex excitability in focal dystonia may be related to the body areas affected by dystonia as opposed to being a widespread pathophysiological abnormality. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study yields information on the differential role played by the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of different focal dystonias.
Authors: J Wissel; C Kabus; R Wenzel; S Klepsch; U Schwarz; A Nebe; L Schelosky; U Scholz; W Poewe Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: B S Hoffland; P Kassavetis; M Bologna; J T H Teo; K P Bhatia; J C Rothwell; M J Edwards; B P van de Warrenburg Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2013-03-31 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Daniel T Corp; Juho Joutsa; R Ryan Darby; Cathérine C S Delnooz; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Danielle Cooke; Cecília N Prudente; Jianxun Ren; Martin M Reich; Amit Batla; Kailash P Bhatia; Hyder A Jinnah; Hesheng Liu; Michael D Fox Journal: Brain Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Lorenzo Rocchi; Jaime Ibáñez; Alberto Benussi; Ricci Hannah; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; John Rothwell Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: T Popa; C Hubsch; P James; A Richard; M Russo; S Pradeep; S Krishan; E Roze; S Meunier; A Kishore Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.379