OBJECTIVES: We describe the surgical treatment of severe epistaxis and evaluate the recurrence of bleeding in a nonrandomized retrospective trial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study comparing bilateral endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery alone (ELSPA) and bilateral endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery with concomitant bilateral external ligation of the anterior ethmoidal artery (ELSPEA) in the management of persistent epistaxis. Clinical and hematologic information, preoperative and surgical care, and short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. The main outcome measure was recurrence of epistaxis in the short- and long-term follow-up periods. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled in the study. There were 20 patients in group A (ELSPA) and 25 in group B (ELSPEA). Three patients in group A and no patients in group B had long-term (more than 2 weeks after surgery) rebleeding. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ELSPA and ELSPEA are effective, well-tolerated, reliable procedures if performed by an experienced surgeon. Their failure can be explained by anatomic lateral nasal wall variations and perioperative technical difficulties. They can be appropriate methods to treat severe recurrent epistaxis refractory to repeated nasal packing.
OBJECTIVES: We describe the surgical treatment of severe epistaxis and evaluate the recurrence of bleeding in a nonrandomized retrospective trial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study comparing bilateral endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery alone (ELSPA) and bilateral endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery with concomitant bilateral external ligation of the anterior ethmoidal artery (ELSPEA) in the management of persistent epistaxis. Clinical and hematologic information, preoperative and surgical care, and short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. The main outcome measure was recurrence of epistaxis in the short- and long-term follow-up periods. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled in the study. There were 20 patients in group A (ELSPA) and 25 in group B (ELSPEA). Three patients in group A and no patients in group B had long-term (more than 2 weeks after surgery) rebleeding. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ELSPA and ELSPEA are effective, well-tolerated, reliable procedures if performed by an experienced surgeon. Their failure can be explained by anatomic lateral nasal wall variations and perioperative technical difficulties. They can be appropriate methods to treat severe recurrent epistaxis refractory to repeated nasal packing.
Authors: Guillaume de Bonnecaze; Y Gallois; P Chaynes; F Bonneville; A Dupret-Bories; E Chantalat; E Serrano Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 1.246