Literature DB >> 25620840

Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Phillip J Schulte1, Anastasios A Tsiatis2, Eric B Laber3, Marie Davidian4.   

Abstract

In clinical practice, physicians make a series of treatment decisions over the course of a patient's disease based on his/her baseline and evolving characteristics. A dynamic treatment regime is a set of sequential decision rules that operationalizes this process. Each rule corresponds to a decision point and dictates the next treatment action based on the accrued information. Using existing data, a key goal is estimating the optimal regime, that, if followed by the patient population, would yield the most favorable outcome on average. Q- and A-learning are two main approaches for this purpose. We provide a detailed account of these methods, study their performance, and illustrate them using data from a depression study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advantage learning; bias-variance tradeoff; model misspecification; personalized medicine; potential outcomes; sequential decision making

Year:  2014        PMID: 25620840      PMCID: PMC4300556          DOI: 10.1214/13-STS450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Sci        ISSN: 0883-4237            Impact factor:   2.901


  26 in total

1.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bayesian and frequentist two-stage treatment strategies based on sequential failure times subject to interval censoring.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Leiko H Wooten; Christopher J Logothetis; Randall E Millikan; Nizar M Tannir
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Evaluating multiple treatment courses in clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; R E Millikan; H G Sung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Methodological challenges in constructing effective treatment sequences for chronic psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy; David W Oslin; A John Rush; Ji Zhu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Eric B Laber; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02

10.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01
View more
  56 in total

1.  Set-valued dynamic treatment regimes for competing outcomes.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Daniel J Lizotte; Bradley Ferguson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  W Xiao; H H Zhang; W Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A First Step Towards Behavioral Coaching for Managing Stress: A Case Study on Optimal Policy Estimation with Multi-stage Threshold Q-learning.

Authors:  Xinyu Hu; Pei-Yun S Hsueh; Ching-Hua Chen; Keith M Diaz; Ying-Kuen K Cheung; Min Qian
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 4.  Recent development on statistical methods for personalized medicine discovery.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhao; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Efficient augmentation and relaxation learning for individualized treatment rules using observational data.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Eric B Laber; Yang Ning; Sumona Saha; Bruce E Sands
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.654

6.  Comment.

Authors:  Qian Guan; Eric B Laber; Brian J Reich
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Quantile-Optimal Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Yu Zhou; Rui Song; Ben Sherwood
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Deep advantage learning for optimal dynamic treatment regime.

Authors:  Shuhan Liang; Wenbin Lu; Rui Song
Journal:  Stat Theory Relat Fields       Date:  2018-05-16

9.  LIBERTI: A SMART study in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hibbard; Jonathan S Friedstat; Sonia M Thomas; Renee E Edkins; C Scott Hultman; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Identifying cost-effective dynamic policies to control epidemics.

Authors:  Reza Yaesoubi; Ted Cohen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.