Literature DB >> 2429969

Mouse satellite DNA, centromere structure, and sister chromatid pairing.

L M Lica, S Narayanswami, B A Hamkalo.   

Abstract

The experiments described were directed toward understanding relationships between mouse satellite DNA, sister chromatid pairing, and centromere function. Electron microscopy of a large mouse L929 marker chromosome shows that each of its multiple constrictions is coincident with a site of sister chromatid contact and the presence of mouse satellite DNA. However, only one of these sites, the central one, possesses kinetochores. This observation suggests either that satellite DNA alone is not sufficient for kinetochore formation or that when one kinetochore forms, other potential sites are suppressed. In the second set of experiments, we show that highly extended chromosomes from Hoechst 33258-treated cells (Hilwig, I., and A. Gropp, 1973, Exp. Cell Res., 81:474-477) lack kinetochores. Kinetochores are not seen in Miller spreads of these chromosomes, and at least one kinetochore antigen is not associated with these chromosomes when they were subjected to immunofluorescent analysis using anti-kinetochore scleroderma serum. These data suggest that kinetochore formation at centromeric heterochromatin may require a higher order chromatin structure which is altered by Hoechst binding. Finally, when metaphase chromosomes are subjected to digestion by restriction enzymes that degrade the bulk of mouse satellite DNA, contact between sister chromatids appears to be disrupted. Electron microscopy of digested chromosomes shows that there is a significant loss of heterochromatin between the sister chromatids at paired sites. In addition, fluorescence microscopy using anti-kinetochore serum reveals a greater inter-kinetochore distance than in controls or chromosomes digested with enzymes that spare satellite. We conclude that the presence of mouse satellite DNA in these regions is necessary for maintenance of contact between the sister chromatids of mouse mitotic chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2429969      PMCID: PMC2114340          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  26 in total

1.  Equilibrium sedimentation in density gradients of DNA preparations from animal tissues.

Authors:  S KIT
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Functional aspects of satellite DNA and heterochromatin.

Authors:  B John; G L Miklos
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1979

3.  Restriction enzyme banding of mouse metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  M Kaelbling; D A Miller; O J Miller
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Molecular arrangement and evolution of heterochromatic DNA.

Authors:  D L Brutlag
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Evolution of an octacentric isochromosome in mouse L-cells.

Authors:  B K Vig; R P Zinkowski; D S Michaelson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Satellite DNA in large marker chromosomes of methotrexate-resistant mouse cells.

Authors:  C J Bostock; E M Clark
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Higher order structure in metaphase chromosomes. I. The 250 A fiber.

Authors:  J B Rattner; B A Hamkalo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-12-06       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Nucleotide sequence repetition: a rapidly reassociating fraction of mouse DNA.

Authors:  M Waring; R J Britten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Three related centromere proteins are absent from the inactive centromere of a stable isodicentric chromosome.

Authors:  W C Earnshaw; B R Migeon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  In situ hybridization at the electron microscope level: hybrid detection by autoradiography and colloidal gold.

Authors:  N J Hutchison; P R Langer-Safer; D C Ward; B A Hamkalo
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  26 in total

1.  The DNA fragments produced by AluI and BstNI digestion of fixed mouse chromosomes.

Authors:  R Mezzanotte; R Rossino; M Nieddu; C Lopez-Fernandez; J Gosalvez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Alternate centromere inactivation in a pseudodicentric (15;20)(pter;pter) associated with a progressive neurological disorder.

Authors:  H Rivera; O Zuffardi; P Maraschio; A Caiulo; C Anichini; R Scarinci; R Vivarelli
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Sequence-directed curvature of repetitive AluI DNA in constitutive heterochromatin of Artemia franciscana.

Authors:  R Benfante; N Landsberger; G Tubiello; G Badaracco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Somatic instability of a Drosophila chromosome.

Authors:  D R Wines; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Kinetochore formation in experimentally undercondensed chromosomes.

Authors:  T Haaf; M Schmid
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A cereal centromeric sequence.

Authors:  L Aragón-Alcaide; T Miller; T Schwarzacher; S Reader; G Moore
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Preservation of a complex satellite DNA in two species of echinoderms.

Authors:  J Sainz; L Cornudella
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Sequence of centromere separation: differential replication of pericentric heterochromatin in multicentric chromosomes.

Authors:  B K Vig; D Broccoli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Scanning electron microscopy of the centromeric region of L-cell chromosomes after treatment with Hoechst 33258 combined with 5-bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  S Takayama; H Hiramatsu
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Cytological and molecular characterization of centromeres in Mus domesticus and Mus spretus.

Authors:  S Narayanswami; N A Doggett; L M Clark; C E Hildebrand; H U Weier; B A Hamkalo
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.