Literature DB >> 24298222

Commentary on fukushima and beneficial effects of low radiation.

Jerry M Cuttler1.   

Abstract

Approximately 160,000 people evacuated the area around the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP shortly after it was damage by the earthquake and tsunami. The evacuation order applied to 70,000 of them, while the other 90,000 left voluntarily and returned soon afterward. After more than two years, most of the 70,000 are still not allowed to return to their homes. The 1100 disaster-related deaths caused by the evacuation order show that this pre-cautionary action, taken to minimize cancer risks, was not "conservative." In this paper, recent studies are reviewed on the consequences of the radioactive releases and on the benefits of many medical treatments with low doses of radiation that were carried out until the 1950s, before the radiation scare was created. Recent research has shed light on the high rate of spontaneous double-strand breaks in DNA and the adaptive protections in cells, tissues and humans that are up-regulated by low radiation. These defences prevent, repair, remove and replace damage, from all causes including external agents. Cancer mortality is reduced. The ICRP's concept of radiation risk is wrong. It should revert to its 1934 concept, which was a tolerance dose of 0.2 roentgen (r) per day based on more than 35 years of medical experience.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298222      PMCID: PMC3834738          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.13-008.Cuttler

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  25 in total

Review 1.  Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident: the guidance of ICRP Publication 111.

Authors:  Jacques Lochard
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.394

Review 3.  Modulation of inflammatory immune reactions by low-dose ionizing radiation: molecular mechanisms and clinical application.

Authors:  F Rödel; B Frey; U Gaipl; L Keilholz; C Fournier; K Manda; H Schöllnberger; G Hildebrandt; C Rödel
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Hemopoietic response to low dose-rates of ionizing radiation shows stem cell tolerance and adaptation.

Authors:  Theodor M Fliedner; Dieter H Graessle; Viktor Meineke; Ludwig E Feinendegen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  The role of x-rays in the treatment of gas gangrene: a historical assessment.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Gaurav Dhawan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Commentary on the appropriate radiation level for evacuations.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  X-Ray treatment of carbuncles and furuncles (boils): a historical assessment.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Reduction of background mutations by low-dose X irradiation of Drosophila spermatocytes at a low dose rate.

Authors:  Takao Koana; Mikie O Okada; Keiji Ogura; Hidenobu Tsujimura; Kazuo Sakai
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Reduction in mutation frequency by very low-dose gamma irradiation of Drosophila melanogaster germ cells.

Authors:  Keiji Ogura; Junji Magae; Yasushi Kawakami; Takao Koana
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  6 in total

1.  Remedy for radiation fear - discard the politicized science.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Treatment of Alzheimer Disease With CT Scans: A Case Report.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Eugene R Moore; Victor D Hosfeld; David L Nadolski
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Evidence That Lifelong Low Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation Increase Lifespan in Long- and Short-Lived Dogs.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Frequencies of chromosomal inversions in Drosophila melanogaster in Fukushima after the nuclear power plant accident.

Authors:  Masanobu Itoh; Ryutaro Kajihara; Yasuko Kato; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu; Yutaka Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Commentary on Inhaled (239)PUO2 in Dogs - A Prophylaxis Against Lung Cancer?

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Ludwig E Feinendegen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Benefits of Low-Dose CT Scan of Head for Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Dan Wu; Gang Wang; Bingyang Bian; Zhuohang Liu; Dan Li
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.658

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.