Literature DB >> 23304099

Commentary on the appropriate radiation level for evacuations.

Jerry M Cuttler1.   

Abstract

This commentary reviews the international radiation protection policy that resulted in the evacuation of more than 90,000 residents from areas near the Fukushima Daiichi NPS and the enormous expenditures to protect them against a hypothetical risk of cancer. The basis for the precautionary measures is shown to be invalid; the radiation level chosen for evacuation is not conservative. The actions caused unnecessary fear and suffering. An appropriate level for evacuation is recommended. Radical changes to the ICRP recommendations are long overdue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evacuation; nuclear accident; radiation protection; spontaneous DNA damage; stimulated biodefences

Year:  2012        PMID: 23304099      PMCID: PMC3526322          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.12-013.Cuttler

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  9 in total

Review 1.  Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Improving the scientific foundations for estimating health risks from the Fukushima incident.

Authors:  Edward Calabrese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Spontaneous DNA damage and its significance for the "negligible dose" controversy in radiation protection.

Authors:  D Billen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Nuclear energy and health: and the benefits of low-dose radiation hormesis.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Myron Pollycove
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Key studies used to support cancer risk assessment questioned.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Muller's Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science?

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Mortality from cancer and all causes among British radiologists.

Authors:  P G Smith; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage.

Authors:  Myron Pollycove; Ludwig E Feinendegen
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Special issue introduction.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Ludwik Dobrzyński
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Commentary on fukushima and beneficial effects of low radiation.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.