Literature DB >> 24910587

Remedy for radiation fear - discard the politicized science.

Jerry M Cuttler1.   

Abstract

Seeking a remedy for the radiation fear in Japan, the author re-examined an article on radiation hormesis. It describes the background for this fear and evidence in the first UNSCEAR report of a reduction in leukemia of the Hiroshima survivors in the low dose zone. The data are plotted and dose-response models are drawn. While UNSCEAR suggested the extra leukemia incidence is proportional to radiation dose, the data are consistent with a hormetic J-shape and a threshold at about 100 rem (1 Sv). UNSCEAR data on lifespan reduction of mammals exposed continuously to gamma rays indicate a 2 gray/year threshold. This contradicts the conceptual basis for radiation protection and risk determination established in 1956-58. In this paper, beneficial effects and thresholds for harmful effects are discussed, and the biological mechanism is explained. The key point: the rate of DNA damage (double-strand breaks) caused by background radiation is 1000 times less than the endogenous (spontaneous) rate. It is the effect of radiation on an organism's very powerful adaptive protection systems that determines the dose-response characteristic. Low radiation up-regulates the protection systems, while high radiation impairs these systems. The remedy for radiation fear is to expose and discard the politicized science.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910587      PMCID: PMC4036393          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.13-055.Cuttler

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  17 in total

Review 1.  Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE.

Authors:  H J Muller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1927-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Hemopoietic response to low dose-rates of ionizing radiation shows stem cell tolerance and adaptation.

Authors:  Theodor M Fliedner; Dieter H Graessle; Viktor Meineke; Ludwig E Feinendegen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Cancer and low dose responses in vivo: implications for radiation protection.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Low doses of radiation reduce risk in vivo.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  How radiotherapy was historically used to treat pneumonia: could it be useful today?

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Gaurav Dhawan
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-12-13
View more
  6 in total

1.  Craniocervical chiropractic procedures - a précis of upper cervical chiropractic.

Authors:  H Charles Woodfield; Craig York; Roderic P Rochester; Scott Bales; Mychal Beebe; Bryan Salminen; Jeffrey N Scholten
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-06

2.  Treatment of Alzheimer Disease With CT Scans: A Case Report.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Eugene R Moore; Victor D Hosfeld; David L Nadolski
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Evidence That Lifelong Low Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation Increase Lifespan in Long- and Short-Lived Dogs.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Evidence of a Dose Threshold for Radiation-Induced Leukemia.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Commentary on Inhaled (239)PUO2 in Dogs - A Prophylaxis Against Lung Cancer?

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Ludwig E Feinendegen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  The LNT Issue Is About Politics and Economics, Not Safety.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.658

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.