Rachna Raman1, Sarah L Mott2, Mary C Schroeder3, Sneha Phadke1, Jad El Masri4, Alexandra Thomas5. 1. Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 2. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 3. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 5. Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Electronic address: alex-thomas@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The effect of body mass index (BMI) and chemotherapy dose reduction on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locoregional breast cancer remains unclear. Contemporary studies have reported largely on trial populations and used dose-capping. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient registries at the University of Iowa were queried to identify patients with operable breast cancer who received NAC. Dose reductions were calculated for taxanes (T), anthracyclines (A) and non-A-T chemotherapy. Clinical-pathologic characteristics, chemotherapy dose reductions, and adverse events were compared between normal (BMI <25) and overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥25). Additionally, the synergistic effect of BMI and chemotherapy dose reduction on pCR was assessed. RESULTS: Of 171 eligible patients, 112 were overweight/obese. Chemotherapy dosing was capped in 2 patients; all others initiated full weight-based treatment. Overweight/obese patients required more frequent taxane (44.6% vs. 25.4%; P = .01) and any chemotherapy dose reductions (50.9% vs. 33.9%; P = .03). pCR was attained in 29.2% of patients. In a multivariable model, the interaction term for BMI as a continuous variable and any chemotherapy dose reduction was significant independent of the clinical stage and tumor receptor status (P = .04). For obese patients, any chemotherapy dose reduction was significantly associated with increased odds of not attaining pCR. CONCLUSION: During NAC, overweight/obese patients more often have chemotherapy dose reductions. Chemotherapy dose reduction in obese patients was a powerful predictor of not attaining pCR. This was not seen for normal or overweight patients. Opportunities might exist to improve pCR rates in this higher-risk group.
INTRODUCTION: The effect of body mass index (BMI) and chemotherapy dose reduction on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locoregional breast cancer remains unclear. Contemporary studies have reported largely on trial populations and used dose-capping. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient registries at the University of Iowa were queried to identify patients with operable breast cancer who received NAC. Dose reductions were calculated for taxanes (T), anthracyclines (A) and non-A-T chemotherapy. Clinical-pathologic characteristics, chemotherapy dose reductions, and adverse events were compared between normal (BMI <25) and overweight/obesepatients (BMI ≥25). Additionally, the synergistic effect of BMI and chemotherapy dose reduction on pCR was assessed. RESULTS: Of 171 eligible patients, 112 were overweight/obese. Chemotherapy dosing was capped in 2 patients; all others initiated full weight-based treatment. Overweight/obesepatients required more frequent taxane (44.6% vs. 25.4%; P = .01) and any chemotherapy dose reductions (50.9% vs. 33.9%; P = .03). pCR was attained in 29.2% of patients. In a multivariable model, the interaction term for BMI as a continuous variable and any chemotherapy dose reduction was significant independent of the clinical stage and tumor receptor status (P = .04). For obesepatients, any chemotherapy dose reduction was significantly associated with increased odds of not attaining pCR. CONCLUSION: During NAC, overweight/obesepatients more often have chemotherapy dose reductions. Chemotherapy dose reduction in obesepatients was a powerful predictor of not attaining pCR. This was not seen for normal or overweight patients. Opportunities might exist to improve pCR rates in this higher-risk group.
Authors: Laura M Lashinger; Lauren M Harrison; Audrey J Rasmussen; Craig D Logsdon; Susan M Fischer; Mark J McArthur; Stephen D Hursting Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-08-26
Authors: I Craig Henderson; Donald A Berry; George D Demetri; Constance T Cirrincione; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; James N Ingle; M Robert Cooper; Daniel F Hayes; Katherine H Tkaczuk; Gini Fleming; James F Holland; David B Duggan; John T Carpenter; Emil Frei; Richard L Schilsky; William C Wood; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer K Litton; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Carla L Warneke; Aman U Buzdar; Shu-Wan Kau; Melissa Bondy; Somdat Mahabir; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Abenaa M Brewster Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert B Basmadjian; Shiying Kong; Devon J Boyne; Tamer N Jarada; Yuan Xu; Winson Y Cheung; Sasha Lupichuk; May Lynn Quan; Darren R Brenner Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-02
Authors: Ilana Usiskin; Fangyong Li; Melinda L Irwin; Brenda Cartmel; Tara Sanft Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 4.872