Literature DB >> 27692669

Disease extent at secondary cytoreductive surgery is predictive of progression-free and overall survival in advanced stage ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Peter G Rose1, James J Java2, Mark A Morgan3, Angeles Alvarez-Secord4, Joshua P Kesterson5, Frederick B Stehman6, David P Warshal7, William T Creasman8, Parviz Hanjani9, Robert T Morris10, Larry J Copeland11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: GOG 152 was a randomized trial of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in patients with suboptimal residual disease (residual tumor nodule >1cm in greatest diameter) following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer. The current analysis was undertaken to evaluate the impact of disease findings at SCS on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
METHODS: Among the 550 patients enrolled on GOG-152, two-hundred-sixteen patients were randomly assigned following 3cycles of cisplatin and paclitaxel to receive SCS. In 15 patients (7%) surgery was declined or contraindicated. In the remaining 201 patients the operative and pathology reports were utilized to classify their disease status at the beginning of SCS as; no gross disease/microscopically negative N=40 (19.9%), no gross disease/microscopically positive N=8 (4.0%), and gross disease N=153 (76.1%).
RESULTS: The median PFS for patients with no gross disease/microscopically negative was 16.1months, no gross disease/microscopically positive was 13.5months and for gross disease was 11.7months, P=0.002. The median OS for patients with no gross disease/microscopically negative was 51.5months, no gross disease/microscopically positive was 42.6months and for gross disease was 34.9months, P=0.018.
CONCLUSION: Although as previously reported SCS did not change PFS or OS, for those who underwent the procedure, their operative and pathologic findings were predictive of PFS and OS. Surgical/pathological residual disease is a biomarker of response to chemotherapy and predictive of PFS and OS.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pathologic complete response; Secondary cytoreduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692669      PMCID: PMC5720165          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prognostic role and predictors of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary unresectable ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marco Petrillo; Gian Franco Zannoni; Lucia Tortorella; Luigi Pedone Anchora; Vanda Salutari; Alfredo Ercoli; Pasquale Alessandro Margariti; Giovanni Scambia; Anna Fagotti
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiangnan Kong; Meena S Moran; Ning Zhang; Bruce Haffty; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D S Alberts; P Y Liu; E V Hannigan; R O'Toole; S D Williams; J A Young; E W Franklin; D L Clarke-Pearson; V K Malviya; B DuBeshter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Second-look operation in ovarian carcinoma: postchemotherapy.

Authors:  J P Smith; G Delgado; F Rutledge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Valerie M Nelson; Al B Benson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development and approval in breast cancer.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; José Baselga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  A drug's life: the pathway to drug approval.

Authors:  Michael K Keng; Candice M Wenzell; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-10

9.  Chemotherapy, early surgical reassessment, and hyperfractionated abdominal radiotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer: results of a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  M E Randall; R J Barrett; N M Spirtos; E Chalas; H D Homesley; S L Lentz; M Hanna
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Peter G Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.